224:
You're turning this into a personal thing, Stuart, maybe because you feel I'm challenging your experience or authority? You are making claims and assumptions about me, the show, and the websites without knowing ANYTHING about me, the show, or the websites. My intention is not to continually argue with you about this stuff. I agree with you that I am not an "impartial" person - I love the show and I think it is hilarious. But I did write an impartial ARTICLE about the show for
Knowledge (on behalf of myself and other fans around the country) and I think you should respect it. That all being said, I disagree strongly with you that there are no notable sources on the page. Apparently, someone at Wiki agrees with me as well because the page has never been deleted. I appreciate your input, and I respect you as a person - but I really wish you would give up your crusade against me and my article.--
195:
have to come to your houses and show you the TV show and magazines or what? (ha ha, just kidding!) Seriously though, I don't understand why this page is being picked on. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it isn't notable or whatever. One last thing (for Stuart) - why did you say the links go to the author's homepage? I don't have a homepage listed on there. The links go to the websites of people featured on the show. You guys are getting carried away with your posts... you're doing quite a bit of that "crystal ball" gazing yourself! All the same, it's not the end of the world to me. Do what you gotta do, but I would appreciate it if you guys took a deep breath before rushing to judgment.--
223:
I e-mailed a copy of the article I wrote for
Knowledge to the webmaster of that site and I previously sent them a picture I photoshopped from various clips of the show for fun. That hardly means I own the site or that I'm any more connected to it than you are. THEY chose to put it on there, not me.
207:
No-one's rushing anything or picking on anyone but I can't help but think you're not help ing your case by saying "that LRS website" as though it were not connected to you when the image (10thLRS.jpg) which is prominently displayed on the Wiki LRS page and which you uploaded is also the dvd cover on
194:
You can order copies of the DVDs off that LRS website. That's how I even heard of the show and saw it in the first place. I have several respectable magazine articles where the show is featured or mentioned (2 of those in national publications), so apparently some of us consider it notable. Do I
128:
Non-notable, single season regional show which has no authorative sources and lots of crystal ball style 'might have beens'. All links on page go to either the author's home page or a single fan site and the DVDs mentioned (which might well suggest notability) appear home made and aren't actually
211:) - and on the licensing tag for the wiki image you say "I made it myself. I willingly release it into the public domain". I don't know if this counts as COI, but pretending to be impartial when you're not isn't brilliant behaviour. There's still not a single notable source on the page either.
121:
94:
89:
98:
81:
17:
209:
228:
215:
199:
188:
165:
133:
63:
146:". That was five days ago and needless to say no such list has surfaced. Delete as non-notable and unverifiable.
85:
242:
36:
241:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
77:
69:
175:
225:
212:
196:
130:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
147:
50:
115:
235:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
144:
We can produce a list of notable sources by the end of today
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
173:unless sources are provided by the end of the AfD
245:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
142:On the talk page, the creator promised: "
7:
129:available commercially, if at all
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
262:
229:21:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
216:17:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
200:20:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
189:12:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
166:17:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
134:09:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
64:21:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
238:Please do not modify it.
78:The_Leon_And_Rustin_Show
70:The_Leon_And_Rustin_Show
32:Please do not modify it.
208:the LRS website (
253:
240:
187:
185:
180:
163:
160:
157:
154:
119:
101:
60:
53:
34:
261:
260:
256:
255:
254:
252:
251:
250:
249:
243:deletion review
236:
181:
176:
174:
161:
158:
155:
152:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
259:
257:
248:
247:
221:
220:
219:
218:
192:
191:
168:
148:Andrew Lenahan
126:
125:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
258:
246:
244:
239:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
217:
214:
213:StuartDouglas
210:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
190:
186:
184:
179:
172:
169:
167:
164:
149:
145:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
131:StuartDouglas
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
237:
234:
222:
193:
182:
177:
170:
151:
143:
139:
127:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
122:View log
59:(o rly?)
95:protect
90:history
52:Majorly
226:Brasky
197:Brasky
178:Irides
171:Delete
140:Delete
99:delete
46:delete
183:centi
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
159:bli
120:– (
162:nd
156:ar
153:St
150:-
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
