397:. I was kind of hoping there might be more discussion, but I guess I'll err on the side of caution. There does seem to be coverage, as listed above, even if it's a bit lighter than I usually like to see. An IP editor recently added a few more sources to the article. I haven't gone over them carefully, but they seem a bit questionable. Still, maybe we can use one or two.
232:
review present on that page is by an online film critic who reviews films only on his own blog rather than in a real media outlet. As always, a film is not automatically entitled to have an article just because it exists -- but nothing written or sourced here suggests that it's notable enough to have
174:
127:
168:
300:
266:
134:
100:
95:
104:
17:
87:
189:
259:
255:
156:
372:
322:
425:
274:. It's not much, but it's better than nothing. I admit that a review in DVD Verdict doesn't carry the same weight as
40:
213:
402:
287:
252:
150:
360:
406:
387:
363:
337:
312:
291:
242:
69:
146:
308:
351:
even if not having the same extensive coverage as a big studio's highly touted and promoted blockbuster.
421:
398:
383:
333:
283:
196:
91:
36:
353:
65:
182:
209:
304:
217:
238:
162:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
83:
75:
270:
225:
62:
348:
221:
282:, but I'd consider it reliable. Not 100% sure about SDGLN, but it seems reliable.
234:
208:. Plot-only summary of a film, which makes no substantive claim of notability per
121:
262:
414:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
375:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
325:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
265:. There are also a few scattered trivial mentions, such as
117:
113:
109:
181:
381:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
331:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
195:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:
301:list of Film-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
212:and is sourced almost entirely to
24:
256:San Diego Gay and Lesbian News
1:
407:04:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
70:01:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
388:00:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
364:08:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
338:02:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
313:11:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
292:03:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
243:23:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
445:
220:-- the closest thing to a
417:Please do not modify it.
251:. I found two reviews:
32:Please do not modify it.
280:The Hollywood Reporter
224:here is its page on
390:
340:
315:
59:
56:non-admin closure
436:
419:
399:NinjaRobotPirate
386:
380:
378:
376:
356:
336:
330:
328:
326:
284:NinjaRobotPirate
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
84:The Love Patient
76:The Love Patient
53:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
415:
391:
382:
371:
369:
354:
341:
332:
321:
319:
271:Tampa Bay Times
226:Rotten Tomatoes
222:reliable source
214:primary sources
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
410:
409:
379:
368:
367:
366:
329:
318:
317:
316:
295:
294:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
418:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
389:
385:
384:North America
377:
374:
365:
362:
361:
358:
357:
350:
346:
343:
342:
339:
335:
334:North America
327:
324:
314:
310:
306:
305:Coolabahapple
302:
297:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
267:
264:
260:
257:
253:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:
64:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
416:
413:
394:
370:
359:
352:
347:per meeting
344:
320:
279:
275:
269:
248:
233:earned one.
229:
205:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
263:DVD Verdict
169:free images
228:, and the
422:talk page
355:Schmidt,
268:from the
210:WP:NFILMS
37:talk page
424:or in a
373:Relisted
323:Relisted
128:View log
39:or in a
276:Variety
249:Comment
235:Bearcat
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
206:Delete
147:Google
105:delete
66:Sailor
349:WP:NF
261:from
254:from
218:blogs
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
403:talk
395:Keep
345:Keep
309:talk
288:talk
258:and
239:talk
230:only
216:and
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
50:keep
278:or
197:TWL
126:– (
63:Sam
52:.
405:)
311:)
303:.
290:)
241:)
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
60:—
401:(
307:(
286:(
237:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.