1492:, as content is peripheral to the Prem Rawat BLP, where the existence of TPRF and Rawat’s relationship to TPRF can be recored, but all other content of the TPRF article is extraneous to the BLP. TPRF is doubly non notable because it's only public activity is providing small level grants for ‘humanitarian’ purposes, the grants are made to ‘delivery agencies’ which are themselves notable and it is in WP articles on those entities where noting TPRF grants might have relevance. Although given the low levels of the grants even that may not meet notability criteria. --
1110:
even heard of Prem Rawat. Bit of a silly comparison really. I'm disinterested in PR, however Jossi and friends (hey, that sounds like a ... never mind...) are clearly highly motivated to make PR's star shine as brightly as possible, (I don't think that can be argued against with a straight face), so where's this "disingenuous"-ness to which Jossi refers? No idea...I am a declared critic of revisionist history though, but we're not talking about that here. --
1232:. Many notable people have foundations and organizations which further their philanthropic of social ideals. Few of those organizations achieve encyclopedic notability. This foundation, whatever its good works, appears to have not (yet) been the subject of any significant verifiable coverage that would establish notability. Delete, as such, without prejudice should notability be established in the future.
1109:
I am not a declared critic of the subject of the article, is that some kind of new tactic? Paint people that disagree with you with colours that are easier to fight against? And nothing against
Sylviecyn, but I hardly think we have anything in common, she's an ex-premie, and up until Feb, I had never
1345:
and do not give significant discussion of "The Prem Rawat
Foundation", other than that it is "based in Los Angeles". A few others are newswire releases built mainly on "according to an announcement by the foundation..." - and then a large quoted section of a press release from the foundation. There
170:. The only "independent" sources are press releases, and the articel is almost entirely sourced from the foundation itself. I've been meaning to nominate this for a while now, aad had alerted involved editors months ago. Despite the warnings they haven't been able to find substantial sources.
243:
As mentioned above, most of the sources you've listed are little more than reprints of press releases. ONEEVENT isn't so much the problem as that the foundation simply doesn't meet the notability stadnards for organizations. Even if we did have independently written articles about this or that
562:
So you're saying that this magazine is a reliable source because the publisher's other publication has won awards? Interesting. Anyway, unless that article is about the TPRF then the addition of a quotation doesn't do anything to establish the notability of this foundation. See
775:
The appearance is that those are press releases written by TPRF and posted to those websites. For example, there is text in the PRC page that is a verbatim copy of what's in published TPRF press releases. So it does appear to be the TPRF talking about itself.
395:
Nobody is arguing about the notability of the foundation's namesake. But there is no sign that the foundation itself is notable. In the Los
Angeles, everybody of substance has a foundation. It's not a big deal. This information could easily be merged into the
1212:
as there is no need to dispose of a lot of relevant information collected in the article. As for notability, there may be some difference of appraisal depending on whether you are recipient or donor of what TPRF does, or just happily busy with your
716:
What primary sources? I see all but one to be non-sepf published sources. Unless you are asserting that the UN World Food
Program, The Philippine Red Cross, and Rotary International are "self-published", which is certaninly not the case: See
308:
Why would these 3rd parties press releases not count? If a charitable organization is referred to by third party organizations that surely count. In any case, I think we have presented our arguments already, so let's allow others to comment.
931:
As I already stated above I had a look before commenting in the AfD to begin with. If you who seems to think they are adequate can't be bothered to include them why, should I who believes they aren't adequate to the task do it for
1161:. In spite of being given several months to do so by WillBeback, editors have apparently been unable to find independent, reliable sources for this article. The content should probably occupy a sentence or two at most in the
995:
I would argue that it is somewhat disingenuous to challenge the "level of commitment of people of those who argue to keep it" when you and the the editor above you, who are declared critics of the subject of this article are
277:
Are Rotary
International, The Philippine National Red Cross, the Barcelona Forum 2004, the ndonesian Development of Education and Permaculture, the Houston Food Bank, and the UN World Food Program reliable 3rd party sources?
808:
It devotes two sentences to TPRF. Is it your contention that two sentences in a deleted press relase establish notability? As for the other press relases, they published by U.S Newswire. But you already knew that.
1362:
Shares in Myrine
Investments Ltd, a private company incorporated in the Channel Islands which owns the land, are held for the Prem Rawat Foundation, but Elan Vital officials say Maharaji "receives no financial
972:
Arguments for keeping this article are very weak, especially so given the commitment level of those who argue to keep it. If there are relevant 3rd-party articles produced, I will consider changing my mind. --
587:
from
Leaders magazine - LEADERS is the only worldwide magazine that deals with the broad range of leadership thoughts and visions of the world's most influential people. LEADERS was founded in 1978 by Henry O.
191:
129:
to make it notable, beyond finding press releases about their work in charitable giving--but that is any number of similar charities, making this one no more notable than any other. I'm not sure it meets
323:
Meh. All kinds of non-notable organizations crank out press releases and pay or trick people into publishing them when they have column space to fill. I don't see how this organization is any different.
292:
Those don't really count as 3rd-party sources and those are press releases, so they don't count towards notability. Furthermore, they are about specific charitable donations rather than the foundation.
125:
I came across this article today. I saw very minimal sourcing on the Prem Rawat
Foundation itself, and was hard pressed to find substantial, non-trivial reporting about the Prem Rawat Foundation
227:. It is true that the news articles that discuss this charity are more focused on the charities work that the organization itself but this AfD is taking the spirit of ONEEVENT a bit too far. -
917:
I am not interested in editing that article, but you are welcome to look into these sources and add it yourself if you assess these sources as being independent of the subject of the article.
1385:
It is true that the foundation of some movements occurred earlier. For example, Soka Gakkai and Divine Light
Mission (DLM, now Elan Vital/Prem Rawat Foundation), were founded in the 1930s.
1341:
article from May 2007. The rest are all extremely brief mentions only, which appear to be publicity placements, a few press releases, and one or two other bits which focus mainly on
1271:. Attempts to find significant coverage and discussion of the subject of this article in independent sources not affiliated with the subject of the article itself were unsuccessful:
626:
appears to fail the notability criteria as well as verifiability. Only coverage I can find are press releases (which no matter what publication they appear in are primary sources).
474:
from "Indian Life&Style" published by India West founded in 1975. The most honored weekly Indian newspaper in North
America. Winner of 28 awards for excellence in journalism.
197:
118:
1513:
887:
696:
1597:
1569:
1541:
721:, which refers to "self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, knols, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable".
219:
85:
80:
602:
That's nice, but a quote mentioning the foundation in passing doesn't establish it's notability. What we need is an article devoted to the foundation itself.
903:
Then include them in the article after making sure that they actually conform to the policy cause they sure didn't look like they did when I looked earlier.
89:
415:
Cool. If you are proposing to merge, then why are you !voting delete? I would not oppose a merge. Or are you suggesting that a redirect will not be needed?
244:
charitable contribution, the article is about the foundation, and so we need to have articles about the foundation itself in order to establish notability.
515:
Are you suggesting that only "the most popular" publications are reliable sources? If so we need to do a huge clean up over at Prem Rawat and Millennium.
72:
791:
The "appearances" are misleading. Who are theses press release from? Who is signing them? In which website are these published? Just look at the source.
681:
sources, which is different, and can be used with some caveats as per policy. In addition, there are many other sources unrelated to this organization.
166:. This is a small foundation (budget around $ 1 or $ 2 million) with no real claim to notability. It doesn't meet the notability standards set out in
824:
US Newsire is just the outlet for these releases. The publishers are the organizations that sign the release. But I am sure you already knew that.
883:
381:. Unless we're running out of memory, why would you seek to remove it? This is the foundation of a notable person and provides additional info.
806:
1352:, which does not appear to be related to or drawn from press releases, but the mention of the "Prem Rawat Foundation" is only in passing:
1444:
That was proposed a few months ago and rejected by eitors on both sides of the issue. That's not binding on us here and now, of course.
1445:
1078:
1044:
839:
838:
They're not "signed", but they do say, "Contact: The Prem Rawat Foundation, 310-392-5700 or pressrelations(At)tprf.org" at the end.
810:
777:
740:
700:
603:
568:
530:
499:
444:
401:
294:
245:
171:
663:
I disagree. The foundation's own website and press releases put out by the organisation are the very definition of primary source.
1011:
1025:
145:
17:
337:
SO, are you asserting that the UN World Food Program and other NGOs have bee tricked or paid off? You have got to be kidding.
1378:
1059:
Agree. There is one SPA for keep and two SPAs for delete. Hope other non-involved editors can contribute to this discussion.
351:
They all have to raise money somehow. But press releases are not a measure of notability. We need reliable, neutral sources.
76:
982:
488:
What's your source for that information? From what I can see it is a small-circulation magazine tending towards puff-pieces.
1670:
1654:
1630:
1612:
1586:
1558:
1530:
1501:
1454:
1439:
1412:
1245:
1222:
1204:
1174:
1153:
1122:
1103:
1087:
1068:
1053:
1037:
985:
964:
941:
926:
912:
896:
848:
833:
819:
800:
786:
770:
749:
730:
709:
690:
672:
657:
635:
612:
597:
577:
557:
539:
524:
508:
483:
453:
424:
410:
390:
359:
346:
332:
318:
303:
287:
272:
254:
238:
180:
157:
54:
1436:
1307:
207:
1074:
Let's see- you complain when involved editors make a comment, then you complain when uninvolved editors participate?
1043:
There are single purpose editors on both sides, so you're right that it doesn't help the discussion to get into it.
489:
1686:
68:
60:
36:
1685:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1431:
1077:
Maybe it'd be better if you let this AfD take its course without further complaints about the participants.
1497:
735:
I don't see anything at the Rotary website. Link rot? Wherever they are, they appear to be press releases.
1451:
1084:
1050:
845:
816:
783:
746:
706:
609:
574:
536:
505:
450:
407:
300:
251:
177:
1493:
1626:
1608:
1119:
1005:
937:
908:
668:
631:
268:
1218:
1199:
1099:
1019:
960:
222:
151:
1650:
233:
210:
225:
695:
One of the caveats is that self-published sources may not be used to establish notability. See
1375:
593:
553:
520:
479:
386:
263:
PRNewswire is a source for press releases. Press releases are not reliable 3rd party sources.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1471:
1448:
1391:
1356:
1348:
1337:
1322:
1302:
1290:
1260:
1081:
1047:
842:
813:
780:
743:
703:
606:
571:
533:
502:
447:
404:
297:
248:
174:
494:
492:
1622:
1604:
1170:
1111:
1064:
1033:
1001:
974:
933:
922:
904:
892:
829:
796:
766:
726:
686:
664:
653:
645:
627:
420:
342:
314:
283:
264:
1401:
Please provide further comments below, and not interspersed in my above comment. Thanks,
440:
You also said that if it did come up for AfD you would not participate in the discussion.
1354:
Thomas, Hedley (April 21, 2004). "Maharaji's inner peace in a tent doesn't come cheap".
1582:
1554:
1526:
1467:
1408:
1256:
1214:
1192:
1095:
1015:
956:
139:
1646:
1638:
1285:
1187:
997:
736:
718:
678:
564:
229:
213:
167:
882:
More sources which have yet to be incorporated into the article are available here:
1664:
589:
549:
516:
475:
382:
49:
497:
106:
1642:
1238:
1183:
204:
194:
131:
1297:
888:
Knowledge:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Non-commercial_organizations
547:
429:
Jossi, you may have forgotten, but I did propose this for merger back in April,
1475:
1427:
1342:
1280:
1264:
1166:
1162:
1146:
1060:
1029:
918:
825:
792:
762:
722:
682:
649:
416:
397:
352:
338:
325:
310:
279:
134:. Are there multiple non-trivial articles or stories or independent reporting
886:. The relevant guideline for non-commercial organizations is available here:
1577:
1549:
1521:
1484:
1403:
1092:
1331:
1316:
443:
Yet here you are, contradicting yourself and violating your commitment.
1288:, except for about 5 hits to the same secondary source article, in the
739:, specifically says that press releases don't count towrds notability.
1368:
No real significant discussion in books, only a passing mention here:
761:- These are not from the foundation, but from highly regarded NGOs. -
756:
Press releases where the company, corporation, organization, or group
1479:
1268:
1233:
200:
1320:
yielded only one press release - and about 8 instances again of the
697:
Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria
546:
I'm not making any assertions but here's the publishers home page
1679:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1372:
Researching New Religious Movements: Responses and Redefinitions
496:
Another competitor says it has "minimal visibility and reach."
1255:
Agree with the delete rationale provided in above comments by
1145:
per Rootology. Also, Will's concerns on notability are valid.
1390:
Was unable to find significant discussion in scholarly works/
435:
Twice, you told me to nominate it for AfD instead of merging.
1335:
15 results came up - 5 of those were yet again to the same
1284:
for "Prem Rawat Foundation" revealed 199 results - all
1075:
441:
438:
436:
433:
430:
113:
102:
98:
94:
805:
Here is the archive copy of the Rotary press release.
1514:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
491:It has 1/7 the circulation of its main competitor.
1165:article, if it's currently unlocked for editing.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1689:). No further edits should be made to this page.
644:(The sources presented in that article are not
1598:list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions
1570:list of Religion-related deletion discussions
1542:list of Business-related deletion discussions
1298:"Cult leader gives cash to Lord Mayor appeal"
8:
529:I'm asking you to source your assertions.
1662:off-topic discussion moved to talk page
1596:: This debate has been included in the
1568:: This debate has been included in the
1540:: This debate has been included in the
1512:: This debate has been included in the
884:Talk:The_Prem_Rawat_Foundation/Sources
1621:Not a notable organization. Thanks.
1294:(partial view at HighBeam Research):
7:
24:
1296:Mendick, Robert (May 31, 2007).
955:As per Will's statement above.
1346:is one other secondary source,
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1671:14:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
1655:05:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
1631:20:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1613:20:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1587:19:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1559:19:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1531:19:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1502:08:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1455:03:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1440:08:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1413:08:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1246:07:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1223:07:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1205:05:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1175:05:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1154:04:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1123:02:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1104:12:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1088:05:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1069:04:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1054:04:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1038:04:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
986:03:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
965:19:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
942:16:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
927:16:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
913:16:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
897:16:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
849:05:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
834:05:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
820:05:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
801:04:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
787:04:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
771:04:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
750:04:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
731:04:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
710:19:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
691:16:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
673:16:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
658:16:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
636:12:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
613:23:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
598:23:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
578:23:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
558:23:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
540:23:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
525:23:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
509:23:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
484:22:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
454:07:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
425:04:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
411:07:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
391:07:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
360:05:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
347:05:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
333:05:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
319:19:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
304:19:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
288:16:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
273:16:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
255:07:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
239:06:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
181:06:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
158:06:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
55:03:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1093:Jossi's Conflict of Interest.
1308:Daily Mail and General Trust
567:for the relevant standards.
190:covered in many news sources
1706:
1374:. Routledge. pp. Page 31.
1370:Arweck, Elisabeth (2006).
754:Red again, my highlight:
69:The Prem Rawat Foundation
61:The Prem Rawat Foundation
1682:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
998:single purpose accounts
1424:No call for merging it
1303:The Evening Standard
432:and you opposed it.
223:Albuquerque Journal
758:talks about itself
211:Medical News Today
44:The result was
1673:
1615:
1601:
1589:
1573:
1561:
1545:
1533:
1517:
1438:
1432:GarbageCollection
1392:academic journals
1242:
1121:
1067:
1036:
984:
925:
895:
832:
799:
769:
729:
689:
656:
423:
345:
317:
286:
53:
1697:
1684:
1667:
1661:
1641:don't establish
1602:
1592:
1574:
1564:
1546:
1536:
1518:
1508:
1435:
1387:
1365:
1357:The Courier Mail
1349:The Courier Mail
1338:Evening Standard
1323:Evening Standard
1311:
1291:Evening Standard
1243:
1240:
1236:
1195:
1151:
1118:
1115:
1063:
1032:
981:
978:
921:
891:
828:
795:
765:
725:
685:
652:
419:
357:
341:
330:
313:
282:
154:
148:
142:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1687:deletion review
1680:
1665:
1381:
1369:
1353:
1329:In a search in
1295:
1239:
1234:
1193:
1180:Delete or Merge
1147:
1113:
976:
646:primary sources
353:
326:
217:The Earth Times
152:
146:
140:
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1703:
1701:
1692:
1691:
1675:
1674:
1658:
1657:
1633:
1616:
1590:
1562:
1534:
1505:
1504:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1396:
1395:
1388:
1379:
1366:
1327:
1312:
1286:press releases
1273:
1272:
1249:
1248:
1241:(aka justen)
1226:
1225:
1207:
1177:
1156:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
989:
988:
967:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
900:
899:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
679:self-published
677:No, these are
661:
639:
638:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
582:
581:
580:
544:
543:
542:
513:
512:
511:
465:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
260:
259:
258:
257:
184:
183:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1702:
1690:
1688:
1683:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1486:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1456:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1421:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1367:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1351:
1350:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1334:
1333:
1328:
1325:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1293:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1237:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1211:
1210:Keep or merge
1208:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1196:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1010:
1007:
1003:
999:
993:
992:
991:
990:
987:
983:
980:
971:
968:
966:
962:
958:
954:
951:
950:
943:
939:
935:
930:
929:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
898:
894:
889:
885:
881:
878:
877:
850:
847:
844:
841:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
818:
815:
812:
807:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
785:
782:
779:
774:
773:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
753:
752:
751:
748:
745:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
728:
724:
720:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
705:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
621:
614:
611:
608:
605:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
586:
583:
579:
576:
573:
570:
566:
561:
560:
559:
555:
551:
548:
545:
541:
538:
535:
532:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
493:
490:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
455:
452:
449:
446:
442:
439:
437:
434:
431:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
409:
406:
403:
399:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
376:
361:
358:
356:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
331:
329:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
307:
306:
305:
302:
299:
296:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
256:
253:
250:
247:
242:
241:
240:
237:
235:
231:
226:
224:
220:
218:
214:
212:
208:
206:
202:
198:
196:
192:
189:
186:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
155:
149:
143:
137:
133:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1681:
1678:
1663:
1635:
1618:
1593:
1576:
1565:
1548:
1537:
1520:
1509:
1489:
1483:
1463:
1423:
1402:
1384:
1371:
1361:
1355:
1347:
1336:
1330:
1321:
1315:
1314:A search in
1301:
1289:
1279:
1278:A search in
1252:
1229:
1209:
1200:
1198:
1191:
1179:
1158:
1148:
1142:
1108:
1058:
1022:
1008:
994:
969:
952:
879:
757:
755:
623:
584:
471:
464:
378:
354:
327:
228:
216:
187:
163:
138:this group?
135:
126:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1494:Nik Wright2
1472:Will Beback
1449:Will Beback
1261:Will Beback
1082:Will Beback
1048:Will Beback
843:Will Beback
814:Will Beback
781:Will Beback
744:Will Beback
704:Will Beback
624:Weak Delete
607:Will Beback
585:Added quote
572:Will Beback
534:Will Beback
503:Will Beback
472:Added quote
448:Will Beback
405:Will Beback
298:Will Beback
249:Will Beback
205:PR Newswire
195:MarketWatch
175:Will Beback
1623:Ism schism
1605:Ism schism
1428:Prem Rawat
1380:0415277558
1343:Prem Rawat
1281:LexisNexis
1163:Prem Rawat
1002:Maelefique
934:Jasynnash2
905:Jasynnash2
665:Jasynnash2
628:Jasynnash2
400:article.
398:Prem Rawat
265:Jasynnash2
193:including
1490:Not merge
1468:Rootology
1363:benefit".
1360:. p. 11.
1257:Rootology
1215:Rainer P.
1096:Sylviecyn
1061:≈ jossi ≈
1030:≈ jossi ≈
1016:Sylviecyn
957:Sylviecyn
919:≈ jossi ≈
826:≈ jossi ≈
793:≈ jossi ≈
763:≈ jossi ≈
723:≈ jossi ≈
683:≈ jossi ≈
650:≈ jossi ≈
417:≈ jossi ≈
339:≈ jossi ≈
311:≈ jossi ≈
280:≈ jossi ≈
141:rootology
1647:Jclemens
1430:yet? --
1332:Newsbank
1326:article.
1317:InfoTrac
1235:user:j
1026:contribs
1012:contribs
588:Dormann.
230:Icewedge
119:View log
1666:MBisanz
1253:Delete.
970:Delete.
953:Delete.
880:Comment
590:Momento
550:Momento
517:Momento
476:Momento
383:Momento
86:protect
81:history
1639:WP:SPS
1636:Delete
1619:Delete
1464:Delete
1267:, and
1230:Delete
1213:POV.--
1194:Enigma
1188:WP:ORG
1182:Fails
1159:Delete
1143:Delete
1065:(talk)
1034:(talk)
923:(talk)
893:(talk)
830:(talk)
797:(talk)
767:(talk)
737:WP:ORG
727:(talk)
719:WP:SPS
687:(talk)
654:(talk)
565:WP:ORG
421:(talk)
343:(talk)
315:(talk)
284:(talk)
201:Forbes
168:WP:ORG
164:Delete
127:itself
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
1476:Cla68
1426:with
1265:Cla68
1167:Cla68
1149:Kelly
1116:fique
979:fique
355:Kelly
328:Kelly
136:about
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
1651:talk
1643:WP:N
1627:talk
1609:talk
1594:Note
1583:talk
1578:Cirt
1566:Note
1555:talk
1550:Cirt
1538:Note
1527:talk
1522:Cirt
1510:Note
1498:talk
1485:Cirt
1482:and
1466:per
1446:·:·
1409:talk
1404:Cirt
1376:ISBN
1219:talk
1186:and
1184:WP:N
1171:talk
1112:Mael
1100:talk
1079:·:·
1045:·:·
1020:talk
1014:) -
1006:talk
975:Mael
961:talk
938:talk
932:you?
909:talk
840:·:·
811:·:·
778:·:·
741:·:·
701:·:·
669:talk
632:talk
604:·:·
594:talk
569:·:·
554:talk
531:·:·
521:talk
500:·:·
480:talk
445:·:·
402:·:·
387:talk
379:Keep
295:·:·
269:talk
246:·:·
234:talk
221:and
188:Keep
172:·:·
132:WP:N
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
1600:.
1572:.
1544:.
1516:.
1452:·:·
1085:·:·
1051:·:·
846:·:·
817:·:·
784:·:·
747:·:·
707:·:·
610:·:·
575:·:·
537:·:·
506:·:·
451:·:·
408:·:·
301:·:·
252:·:·
178:·:·
1653:)
1645:.
1629:)
1611:)
1585:)
1557:)
1529:)
1500:)
1488:.
1478:,
1474:,
1470:,
1434:-
1411:)
1383:.
1306:.
1300:.
1263:,
1259:,
1221:)
1190:.
1173:)
1102:)
1028:)
1000::
963:)
940:)
911:)
890:]
699:.
671:)
648:.
634:)
596:)
556:)
523:)
482:)
389:)
271:)
215:,
209:,
203:,
199:,
156:)
150:)(
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
50:BJ
48:.
1649:(
1625:(
1607:(
1603:—
1581:(
1575:—
1553:(
1547:—
1525:(
1519:—
1496:(
1480:J
1407:(
1394:.
1310:.
1269:J
1217:(
1169:(
1114:e
1098:(
1023:·
1018:(
1009:·
1004:(
977:e
959:(
936:(
907:(
667:(
660:)
630:(
592:(
552:(
519:(
478:(
385:(
267:(
236:)
232:(
153:T
147:C
144:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.