72:
Term with little results on Google, unreferenced, and could be a dictionary addition at most. Should an encyclopedia article be necessary?
17:
99:
148:
36:
147:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
133:
118:
104:
76:
60:
53:
66:
57:
49:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
130:
90:
113:
73:
86:
129:
Is this like the rich white kids who rip up their $ 80 jeans to be cool? --
127:"the owner of the Rat Look is usually an interlecual (sic) person."
141:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
151:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
112:NN neologism, with few relevant ghits
7:
24:
85:An article on a certain kind of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
168:
134:03:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
119:15:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
105:15:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
77:12:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
61:11:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
144:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
103:
159:
146:
116:
93:
34:
167:
166:
162:
161:
160:
158:
157:
156:
155:
149:deletion review
142:
114:
70:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
165:
163:
154:
153:
137:
136:
121:
107:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
164:
152:
150:
145:
139:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
122:
120:
117:
111:
108:
106:
101:
97:
92:
89:? Come on. --
88:
84:
81:
80:
79:
78:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
56:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
143:
140:
126:
123:
109:
82:
71:
67:The Rat Look
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
50:Mailer Dia
131:Xrblsnggt
100:contribs
91:Larry V
83:Delete.
124:Delete
115:Lurker
110:Delete
46:delete
87:dirty
74:Ethii
16:<
96:talk
48:. -
98:|
58:lo
102:)
94:(
54:b
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.