158:
I have added several references to the article that establish Ronto's regional notability....quite a bit of hits on google news (showing substantial recent media attention to their projects). If necessary I will head to the Lexis Nexis to find older references. Hope this helps.
175:
I have certainly heard of this company...seems to get a lot of media attention down here as a major player in the southern florida development industry. plus has plenty of sources / evidence of notability. unclear at this point why it would make sense to delete this.
117:
Notable real estate development company. Among the larger such companies in the US and among the largest in rapidly growing South
Florida. Please do not speedy delete, at least let its notability be debated.
197:
It certainly doesn't qualify for speedy deletion now, and it has been expanded some, but it still needs a lot of work, and all of the actual sources come from a single site (naplesnews.com).
206:
It seems that the dominant newspaper in an area is enough to establigh local /regional notability, and local / regional notability is sifficient for inclusion per wikipedia guidelines.
17:
207:
160:
119:
104:
225:
36:
224:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
210:
201:
180:
163:
150:
122:
107:
95:
72:
52:
58:
91:
142:
notability can be proven. I don't think it can, but I'd be perfectly happy to be wrong. Well, in
49:
130:
So... debate it. As the creator of the article, you should be able to provide some evidence of
82:
177:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
131:
65:
198:
147:
69:
103:
I have added a criticisms section so this reads less like an ad.
218:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
195:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
64:Non-notable company, as far as I can tell. As per
228:). No further edits should be made to this page.
194:has sources; when I nominated it, it did not.
8:
7:
24:
138:summarily deleting the article
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
68:, it can be speedily deleted.
1:
48:, no consensus to delete. -
245:
211:18:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
202:16:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
53:23:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
181:18:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
164:13:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
151:05:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
123:04:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
108:15:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
96:23:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
73:22:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
221:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
146:instance, that is. ;)
208:Justinpwilsonadvocate
161:Justinpwilsonadvocate
120:Justinpwilsonadvocate
105:Justinpwilsonadvocate
94:
81:advertisement. --
236:
223:
134:. I'm fine with
90:
87:
34:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
235:
234:
233:
232:
226:deletion review
219:
83:
62:
59:The Ronto Group
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
242:
240:
231:
230:
215:
214:
213:
184:
183:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
112:
111:
110:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
241:
229:
227:
222:
216:
212:
209:
205:
204:
203:
200:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:
182:
179:
174:
171:
165:
162:
157:
154:
153:
152:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
121:
116:
113:
109:
106:
102:
99:
98:
97:
93:
88:
86:
80:
79:Strong Delete
77:
76:
75:
74:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Richardcavell
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
220:
217:
191:
190:The article
187:
178:Captaintruth
172:
155:
143:
139:
135:
127:
114:
100:
84:
78:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
132:notability
188:Comment
156:Comment
128:Comment
101:Comment
66:CSD-A7
199:EVula
148:EVula
70:EVula
16:<
173:Keep
144:this
115:Keep
92:talk
85:MECU
46:Keep
192:now
136:not
140:if
89:≈
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.