376:
Don't see why not. The Sun isn't exactly renowned for accuracy and balance, but they still wouldn't publish an allegation that serious without evidence to back that up if it goes to court. Failing that, there's quite a bit of interesting material in references 2 and 6 (which came from broadsheets)
211:
for anything other than the single prank noted. Article has now been renamed, but is still almost entirely about the person who played the prank. The prank itself had brief coverage in the UK national press, but still fails notability per
160:
306:
248:
115:
377:
which have also been glossed over. Not saying we should have an article about that, but there's just as much reason to write this about him as there is for that stunt.
154:
120:
276:. News coverage of the subject has been isolated to the week in 2006 in which this incident occurred. Significant coverage is not evident or
17:
88:
83:
92:
213:
75:
358:
use either of those articles as a reference for anything related to a living person?! If you did, please make sure you read
175:
382:
343:
142:
208:
422:
36:
302:
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
378:
339:
136:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
277:
273:
221:
196:
192:
407:
386:
371:
347:
318:
293:
263:
237:
132:
57:
225:
79:
53:
182:
289:
168:
71:
63:
217:
327:
281:
204:
403:
367:
314:
259:
233:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
49:
359:
335:
200:
148:
326:. I'll leave it up to others to decide whether this incident is notable, but if it is,
285:
399:
363:
310:
255:
229:
109:
334:
ought to be considered if we're going into detail about Mr. King. You did read
398:
agree with
Cindamuse, there is no evidence of long term notability.
207:
apart from the one event, with no significant coverage online from
415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
307:
WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/WikiRecontributer47/Archive
105:
101:
97:
167:
249:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:to validate notability for either the event or
8:
243:
247:: This debate has been included in the
309:for previous account name of creator.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
195:, and was prodded on grounds of
354:Do you seriously think we could
301:article also appears to be an
284:. Recommend article deletion.
191:Article was originally titled
1:
408:20:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
387:21:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
372:20:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
348:17:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
319:12:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
294:12:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
264:12:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
238:12:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
58:13:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
442:
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
214:WP:Notability (events)
193:Alex King (bet_winner)
379:Chris Neville-Smith
340:Chris Neville-Smith
209:WP:Reliable sources
44:The result was
266:
252:
433:
420:
303:WP:Autobiography
253:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
441:
440:
436:
435:
434:
432:
431:
430:
429:
423:deletion review
416:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
439:
437:
428:
427:
411:
410:
392:
391:
390:
389:
351:
350:
338:, didn't you?
321:
296:
267:
222:WP:PERSISTENCE
197:WP:SINGLEEVENT
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
438:
426:
424:
419:
413:
412:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
388:
384:
380:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
250:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:The Royal Bet
69:
68:
65:
64:The Royal Bet
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
414:
395:
355:
323:
298:
274:single event
269:
244:
226:WP:SENSATION
216:, including
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
332:this story
328:this story
282:individual
278:persistent
199:, failing
286:Cindamuse
218:WP:EFFECT
205:WP:BLP1E
116:View log
400:Smartse
364:Smartse
324:Comment
311:Top Jim
299:Comment
256:Top Jim
230:Top Jim
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
396:Delete
360:WP:BLP
336:WP:LUC
305:: see
272:. One
270:Delete
201:WP:BIO
133:Google
93:delete
46:delete
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
404:talk
383:talk
368:talk
356:ever
344:talk
330:and
315:talk
290:talk
260:talk
245:Note
234:talk
224:and
203:and
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
406:)
385:)
370:)
362:.
346:)
317:)
292:)
262:)
251:.
236:)
228:.
220:,
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
402:(
381:(
366:(
342:(
313:(
288:(
258:(
254:—
232:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.