17:
154:
36:
139:
127:
115:
103:
91:
77:
52:
153:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
124:
58:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
136:
112:
73:
49:
100:
86:- Given the article originator, seems like a vanity piece. --cholmes75 (
69:
147:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
99:
extraordinarily badly-written advert for nn newsletter.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
157:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
135:It looks like spam or an advertisement. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
64:Contested speedy deletion.
174:
150:Please do not modify it.
140:01:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
128:13:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
116:12:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
104:10:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
92:03:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
78:02:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
53:12:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
123:- as per the above. --
59:The Stinger Report
165:
152:
125:HolyRomanEmperor
34:
173:
172:
168:
167:
166:
164:
163:
162:
161:
155:deletion review
148:
111:vanity/spam. --
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
171:
169:
160:
159:
143:
142:
130:
118:
106:
94:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
170:
158:
156:
151:
145:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
129:
126:
122:
119:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
89:
85:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
149:
146:
132:
120:
108:
96:
83:
65:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
137:Starionwolf
113:Bachrach44
88:chit chat
50:Longhair
66:No vote
133:Delete
121:Delete
109:Delete
101:Vizjim
97:Delete
84:Delete
46:Delete
68:. --
16:<
74:talk
70:Nlu
48:--
90:)
76:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.