517:]. This editor has gone after three of the articles I started up and has expressed the intention to go after more. He has very few edits to speak of doesn't mind destroying a piece of historical knowledge in order to achieve a more hurtful objective. His agenda is to stop me from writing new articles about the music I love by making me operate in an atmosphere of fear. I would understand a proposed deletion at a later time from and established, detached, and unbiased editor. As I've said, I would more than understand that--if it came in a different set of circumstances and after a sufficient trial period. That would be fair. But, this article is only two weeks old. Why give this harmful editor the victory he craves?
763:, item 5: "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." The fact that they have had songs released on compilation albums by the "largest independently owned reissue label in the United States" could be construed as to fall into that category, but only weakly at best.
609:: It is interesting how the user who just voted "Delete" has had approximately 45-50 articles deleted, so is hardly one to lecture about notability. I would say that this article looks like War and Peace compared to many of the one to three-sentence stubs I've seen this user write. I have not gotten involved with the controversies surrounding those articles. I also need to mention that the previous commenter has been blocked on several occasions
782:- While I wouldn't rate this band in the same level of notoriety as, say, the Count Five or Paul Revere and the Raiders, among garage enthusists, they still have garnered some attention even though they disbanded almost 50-years-ago. The fact the band has come back to the attention of listeners is impressive, and helps readers comprehend the grand scale of the garage scene across the US.
302:
local and regional stations there (a possibility). It is included on the third volume
Crystal Ties, and the earlier entries in the series cover the more popular acts--there may have been some regional chart action with it. Look, this is a brand new article. I realize that if things do not pan out for it, then I would accept a deletion down the road, but let's just give it more time.
343:
Why not just keep it for now, because it will be harder to start all over and re-write it. This article's existence isn't going to cause the world to come to an end. It might actually be beneficial to people who want to learn about garage rock and its illustrious cast of unsung heroes. Destroying
228:
which AllMusic gave 4 1/2 stars. People are still listening to their music fifty years after it was made. Respected music historian and writer Bruce Eder did a biographical write-up on this band in AllMusic in addition to the review he did on
Crystal Green Ties Vol. 3, and he mentions this band by
301:
But, before we throw this article into the dustbin, why don't we give it some time. New sources could emerge in the course of time. Their A-side is indeed catchy and had hit potential. We might be able to find mentions of its airplay in the
Abilene area--we may end up finding out it was a hit on
499:
I have made an inquiry about Eder at the reliable sources noticeboard. I have read that that he has not only written music pieces for AllMusic, but has also written movie criticism for the
Criterion Collection, the most prestigious DVD label (as well as in a host of other publications). He also
621:]. If you don't think that I've put in some diligent work here, then think again. But, sometimes things can get demoralizing around here for a dedicated content generator, who works tirelessly for the good of the encyclopedia. I am a dedicated writer, who is very kind to volunteer my time.
524:]), helping push it to its newly attained GA status. In a time when I should have been celebrating, I had to deal with the harassment situation which was strategically planned to coincide with the Dec. 15 DYK mention. So, I ask you to consider all of this before you push the delete button.
613:]. I do not go around here advocating deletions for other editors' work. I have written over 100 quality articles and have done one of the largest expansions that can possibly be done on a general article covering a whole musical genre, Gargage rock (March:
229:
name in the review on the compilation (something he only does for some of the bands). If he deemed the band to be noteworthy enough to feature in AllMusic, then why shouldn't we? I also included book references from Mike
Markesich's
233:
I could order a copy of Green
Crystal Ties, Vol. 3--there is a good chance the band members are listed in the liner notes there. This article should be kept. Keep in mind that it is a new article. Let's give it a chance.
169:
260:
520:
As for the garage rock article, I am well aware of it--I worked hard expand its length almost tenfold and added over 350 references to it in the last half year (see where it was on May 27
122:
549:
I don't see how
Knowledge (XXG) can rely on Google for its notability on a band from the '60's! (And now Google's relying on Knowledge (XXG) for reliability. Oh, the irony!) --
515:) blocked which he created for the sole purpose of harassing me. He does not have an unbiased agenda--his intention is to harm. Please see the things he wrote on my talk page
163:
200:
Article lacks any sources to show notability. From what it shows, the group recorded one single that was unsuccessful and the band members cannot even be identified.
392:
568:
as far more notable then many of the pageant winners that attract keep votes. People are still listing to them which means they have a cult following per
129:
462:
95:
90:
99:
82:
220:: The Stumblin' Blox from Texas can be considered notable. Their work has been included on well-known garage rock compilations such as
17:
440:
184:
151:
749:
732:
696:
598:
581:
383:
364:
209:
814:
40:
268:
145:
791:
787:
772:
723:
694:
630:
559:
557:
533:
482:
404:
353:
334:
311:
292:
272:
251:
64:
469:
may be, check him out there. As far as being benificial to people who want to learn about garage rock, there is a
141:
428:
712:. Am a bit curious as to why one of the keep !votes referenced nmodel, since this has nothing to do with that.
329:
86:
344:
it will just get in the way of people who would like to learn a thing or two. So, just keep it and be happy.
205:
191:
626:
594:
529:
349:
307:
289:
264:
247:
239:
810:
783:
687:
550:
36:
768:
577:
324:
281:
While they made it into
Allmusic, a three-sentence writeup isn't much of a notability endorsement.
177:
78:
70:
709:
683:
569:
420:
323:
and at best & draft and userfy as my searches including archives found nothing better at all.
157:
508:
381:
201:
466:
622:
590:
525:
456:
432:
400:
345:
303:
283:
243:
235:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
809:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
760:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
507:
Right now the editor who nominated this article for deletion has two simultaneous accounts (
478:
705:
451:
424:
654:
444:
764:
573:
512:
55:
713:
374:
743:
396:
504:(deluxe box set). He seems to be a writer of impeccable professional credentials.
116:
616:
474:
470:
572:. Article coukd use a little cleanup though as it seems to repeat itself.
589:
As per nomination. Very insignificant band that does NOT pass GNG.
443:
when it has citations to significant coverage in multiple independent
461:
the reliability of a source can be checked by putting it up on the
803:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
449:
Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail.
735:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
367:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
261:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
112:
108:
104:
176:
373:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
741:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
437:
it will be harder to start all over and re-write it
190:
649:
647:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
817:). No further edits should be made to this page.
500:wrote the liner notes for the Rolling Stones'
759:. I would err on the side of keep because of
465:. Allmusic.com is not a reliable source, but
8:
391:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
435:, because as they (singular) say otherwise
439:, with the caveat that it only returns to
393:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
390:
258:
682:I agree with Legacypac that this passes
643:
611:], where I have not been blocked once
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
619:)--helping push it to GA Status
463:WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
242:) 01:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
1:
792:17:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
773:00:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
750:23:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
724:19:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
697:20:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
631:17:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
599:15:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
582:08:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
560:03:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
534:05:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
483:23:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
405:19:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
384:18:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
354:17:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
335:05:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
312:04:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
293:01:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
273:02:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
252:08:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
210:22:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
419:from article space. Fails
65:06:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
834:
806:Please do not modify it.
661:. All Media Network, LLC
32:Please do not modify it.
655:"Bruce Eder: Biography"
704:- clearly fails both
690:MurderByDeletionism
553:MurderByDeletionism
473:article already. --
69:
502:Singles Collection
492:Topics to consider
222:Green Cyrstal Ties
79:The Stumblin' Blox
71:The Stumblin' Blox
752:
407:
386:
275:
265:Shawn in Montreal
63:
825:
808:
784:TheGracefulSlick
746:
740:
738:
736:
720:
717:
671:
670:
668:
666:
651:
460:
445:reliable sources
379:
372:
370:
368:
332:
327:
287:
231:Teenbeat Mayhem.
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
821:
815:deletion review
804:
753:
744:
731:
729:
718:
715:
676:
675:
674:
664:
662:
653:
652:
645:
454:
387:
375:
363:
361:
330:
325:
285:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
820:
819:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
739:
728:
727:
726:
699:
673:
672:
642:
641:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
563:
562:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
518:
505:
486:
485:
409:
408:
371:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
338:
337:
326:SwisterTwister
321:Delete for now
317:
316:
315:
314:
296:
295:
276:
256:
255:
254:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
818:
816:
812:
807:
801:
800:
793:
789:
785:
781:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
754:
751:
748:
747:
737:
734:
725:
722:
721:
711:
707:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
692:
691:
685:
681:
678:
677:
660:
656:
650:
648:
644:
640:
632:
628:
624:
620:
618:
614:
612:
610:
608:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
561:
558:
556:
555:
554:
548:
545:
544:
535:
531:
527:
523:
521:
519:
516:
514:
510:
509:ABriefPassing
506:
503:
498:
497:
496:
495:
493:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
458:
453:
450:
446:
442:
441:article space
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
389:
388:
385:
382:
380:
378:
369:
366:
355:
351:
347:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
333:
328:
322:
319:
318:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
291:
290:
288:
280:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
232:
227:
226:Acid Visions,
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
202:ABriefPassing
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
805:
802:
779:
756:
742:
730:
714:
701:
689:
688:
679:
665:December 18,
663:. Retrieved
658:
638:
623:Garagepunk66
606:
591:CrazyAces489
586:
585:
565:
564:
552:
551:
546:
526:Garagepunk66
501:
491:
457:Garagepunk66
448:
436:
433:Garagepunk66
416:
412:
376:
362:
346:Garagepunk66
320:
304:Garagepunk66
282:
278:
244:Garagepunk66
236:Garagepunk66
230:
225:
221:
217:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
471:Garage rock
164:free images
639:References
522:] and now
467:Bruce Eder
58:Sandstein
811:talk page
765:Lithorien
757:Weak Keep
710:WP:NMUSIC
684:WP:NMODEL
574:Legacypac
570:WP:NMODEL
513:ALongStay
421:WP:NMUSIC
397:• Gene93k
279:Weak keep
37:talk page
813:or in a
733:Relisted
659:AllMusic
423:, fails
377:UY Scuti
365:Relisted
286:itsJamie
123:View log
39:or in a
761:WP:BAND
745:MBisanz
547:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
706:WP:GNG
702:Delete
587:Delete
475:Bejnar
452:WP:GNG
429:Userfy
425:WP:GNG
417:delete
413:Userfy
142:Google
100:delete
617:Today
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
788:talk
780:Keep
769:talk
719:5969
716:Onel
708:and
686:. --
680:Keep
667:2015
627:talk
607:Note
595:talk
578:talk
566:Keep
530:talk
511:and
479:talk
415:and
401:talk
350:talk
331:talk
308:talk
284:OhNo
269:talk
248:talk
240:talk
224:and
218:KEEP
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
615:],
431:to
192:TWL
121:– (
52:.
790:)
771:)
657:.
646:^
629:)
597:)
580:)
532:)
494::
481:)
447:.
427:.
403:)
395:.
352:)
310:)
271:)
263:.
250:)
208:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
786:(
767:(
669:.
625:(
593:(
576:(
528:(
477:(
459::
455:@
399:(
348:(
306:(
267:(
246:(
238:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.