220:
375:
articles. The production began in 2003, is part of a very notable franchise, has received continuous coverage for those 6 years, and a blanket deletion does not best serve the project. And for a merge, the article must be kept first and such merge discussed on the article's talk page.
160:
268:
I don't seem to remember suggesting that. That being said, there's no consensus that either guideline "outranks" the other - they are both guidelines, and thus neither has precedence.
259:
The first diff didn't have any reliable sources. If you're suggesting that NFF should override the
General Notability Guideline, you're going to have to make that case first.
154:
121:
306:
394:
sources found by Powers confer notability. Most future films are non-notable, but that doesn't mean all are non-notable and this one passes. --
88:
83:
92:
75:
17:
175:
245:
is nearly 4 years old and has a completely different cast, I think this is a textbook example of why we DO have the NFF guideline.
142:
273:
250:
200:
418:
136:
36:
132:
381:
417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
403:
385:
330:
286:
277:
269:
263:
254:
246:
232:
204:
196:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
368:
182:
320:
79:
53:
349:
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are
377:
399:
168:
148:
371:
to decide that the topic should have an article in some form, even if merged into one of the many
195:. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun.
315:
71:
63:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
364:
356:
344:
192:
360:
340:
395:
214:
350:
283:
260:
229:
282:
If neither has precedence, then an article need only meet one or the other, right?
109:
217:
226:
223:
372:
213:. Easily meets general notability guidelines, rendering NFF moot.
411:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
339:
and discuss possible merge. With respects to the nominator.
355:." Certainly, there are not many acceptable exceptions to
242:
116:
105:
101:
97:
167:
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
421:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
363:as does this subject, it is time perhaps to
301:
307:list of Film-related deletion discussions
305:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
193:future film notability guidelines
1:
359:, but when a subject has the
347:is a sub-criteria, states "
228:... I could easily go on.
58:00:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
438:
404:02:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
386:00:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
331:18:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
287:13:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
278:00:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
264:20:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
255:17:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
233:16:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
205:16:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
414:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
270:Girolamo Savonarola
247:Girolamo Savonarola
197:Girolamo Savonarola
48:as per consensus.
44:The result was
333:
310:
191:Explicitly fails
72:The Smurfs (film)
64:The Smurfs (film)
429:
416:
326:
323:
318:
311:
186:
185:
171:
119:
113:
95:
34:
437:
436:
432:
431:
430:
428:
427:
426:
425:
419:deletion review
412:
378:MichaelQSchmidt
324:
321:
316:
128:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
435:
433:
424:
423:
407:
406:
388:
353:of the subject
334:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
243:the first diff
236:
235:
189:
188:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
434:
422:
420:
415:
409:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
352:
346:
342:
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
327:
319:
308:
304:
300:
299:
288:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
231:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
413:
410:
391:
348:
336:
314:
313:
302:
211:Obvious keep
210:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
351:independent
241:Given that
155:free images
50:Pastor Theo
396:ThaddeusB
369:judgement
343:of which
361:coverage
122:View log
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
373:Smurfs
357:WP:NFF
345:WP:NFF
284:Powers
261:Powers
230:Powers
133:Google
117:delete
93:delete
367:best
341:WP:NF
325:orium
176:JSTOR
137:books
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
400:talk
392:Keep
382:talk
337:Keep
322:left
303:Note
274:talk
251:talk
201:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
365:use
317:The
312:--
183:TWL
402:)
384:)
309:.
276:)
253:)
225:,
222:,
219:,
216:,
203:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
398:(
390:'
380:(
272:(
249:(
199:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.