1103:
I did hesitate about the title. Perhaps that is why some would see this as a "sensational report" (to be fair). I don't know if this would help, but often articles have (newspaper) or (magazine) in the title. Perhaps the (report) or (article) could follow this naming convention. Or it may be that I'm
774:
If everything that would be covered by reliable sources would become
Knowledge articles, Knowledge would become a mess 2) You should know what a genocide is before starting to use that word loosely 3) The courts said that this was not even suitable to be considered as evidence. Can you please tell me
1330:
in India. The coverage of investigative journalism is stronger for the US and UK but India is underserved in
Knowledge on this area. Our different focus is probably also why we also disagree about the issue of WP:SIGCOV. Yes, reports can be used as a reliable source (about this we all agree) and the
1295:
events are suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge. This article is essentially about a first-hand report with dubious validity. Come on, Crtew. There are literally thousands of well-noted reports presenting theories that are drastically different from accepted reality of a situation, but that doesn't
847:
SAJAforum is a blog from SAJA, the South Asian
Journalists Association.We cover new desi (South Asian) stuff daily. Since the blog launched during the 2006 SAJA Convention & Job Fair, we have had 1,000+ postings on dozens of topics - from the serious to the silly, and 3,300+ comments from our
197:
This is some kind of sensational report, Knowledge is not a collection of such reports. This report had no far reaching consequence unlike the watergate reports and this report has been discredited as it had multiple inaccuracies. There is no reason why this article should be present on
Knowledge
738:
here, as the answer isn't relevant. As stated previously, if you look at the discussion prior to the relist, none of the readers made justifications for deletion other than "it's wrong" (not relevant) and "it's talked about elsewhere" (does not disqualify a discussion of this particular topic).
1258:
Now as to the content of the article you cite and the point you're trying to make with this article. Your characterization of the article is false. The author, in fact, criticizes the SIT for being "dysfunctional" and one of the reasons is that it dismissed evidence like that offered by the
1202:
Tehelka is a downright partisan source, if this gets its separate articles then I have dozens of articles in store. Some critics even argued that the inaccuracies of the claims detract from its validity as evidence(). The
Supreme Court Special Investigation Team eventually
1235:
The editor's comment above addresses criticism that journalists/journalism receives from people who don't like the facts or the focus on the content, which is standard for controversial investigative reports like this. However, the editor also shows per
166:
697:
Of course you are the king. You can do anything. But you still haven't answered my question. Did you reopen the AFD and undeleted the article after receiving the personal note from one of the keep voters? And am sure you went through the
1020:
I'm not sure what you mean by "found unreliable," but the following books referencing the subject of the article were published in 2012 or 2013, suggesting that it remains a topic of continuing interest half a decade after release:
636:
at 15:11, 20 May 2013 but undid that all. Could you please give your rationale for doing that? Are you counting votes? You feel the discussion is still inadequate? Or was it maybe because one of the Keep voters wrote a
160:
92:
87:
96:
1209:
Jaffrelot, Christophe (25 February 2012). "Gujarat 2002: What
Justice for the Victims? The Supreme Court, the SIT, the Police and the State Judiciary". Economic & Political Weekly. xlvii (8): 77–89.
79:
1331:
same report can be examined as journalism, like a novel or a movie. Still I see no reason why our difference in focus would lead you to mischaracterize what the source above said about the report.
233:: The report was notable enough to be covered by a wide range of domestic and international media, including AP, Reuters, AFP, BBC, Hindustan Times, Independent, NDTV, CNN-IBN, PTI, etc. See a
673:, despite them mostly being entirely bollocks. Similarly, "many articles dealing with the subject" would imply maybe a merge, but there's a not a good reason to only have one of
517:
126:
669:. There wasn't enough policy-based discussion to justify closure; saying the report was "inaccurate" does not have any real bearing on its notability. We have articles on
83:
974:). One can agree or disagree with the contents or journalistic ethics of the report, but I fail to understand how someone could reasonably claim that it's not notable. -
253:
Everything that is covered by the media need not be included on wikipedia, I don't think that sajaforum is even a RS. What happened after the sting operation? Nothing. -
1259:
journalists. Why are you trying to use this source to discredit this work of journalism when the SOURCE is not saying this. That's an inappropriate use of a citation.
119:
181:
851:
148:
75:
67:
806:. The creation, legal standing, ethics and politics of the Tehelka tapes are all notable (and are hotly debated still), and deserve place in the article.
320:
237:. I've made substantial improvements to the article, including describing the content, adding more references, and adding many more cites for notability. --
289:
1340:
1321:
1268:
1253:
1226:
1161:
1140:
1113:
1094:
1073:
1050:
1015:
983:
876:
837:
815:
784:
750:
729:
692:
660:
623:
609:
593:
569:
535:
504:
476:
429:
384:
343:
312:
280:
262:
246:
225:
207:
61:
670:
142:
681:. I'm not commenting on the notability of this specific article, as I have not investigated it personally beyond reviewing the discussions here.
138:
271:
you will know that this was somekind of sensational report that was produced by
Tehelka, I do not see why it can be considered as notable. -
1011:
872:
725:
656:
531:
472:
188:
441:: The report was criticized and proved to be inaccurate. Apart from factual inaccuracies the report also mixed it with a Bollywood film.
665:
Administrators are allowed to modify their determination as to the result of the debate; this is allowed per the steps one takes pre-
803:
500:
154:
17:
772:
significant coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion
423:
824:
Legal standing? The investigation teams did not consider the tapes as an evidence, these tapes have no legal standing,
833:
780:
276:
258:
203:
892:
the report has been referenced both in the Indian
Parliament and US Congress, and also mentioned in at least 20 books
799:
1326:
While for you the topic of this report is 2002 Gujarat
Violence, for me and others it is also notable in the topic
1302:
We ought to be using these reports as "reliable sources" for supporting the claims about the subject (in this case
699:
378:
337:
306:
992:
How many of these publications have mentioned the report after it was found unreliable? And what is the nature of
1363:
1157:
40:
1327:
1007:
868:
721:
652:
527:
468:
454:
221:
445:
Plus, we already have the sensationalization of the report and its fakeness covered in various articles like
268:
710:
were deleted when you point us to other theories that exists on Knowledge? And if many article are already
829:
776:
678:
450:
272:
254:
199:
794:: This was a significant media event that has been noted in fora in India and beyond. SAJA discusses it
707:
703:
1359:
1303:
1170:
496:
446:
36:
1198:
Sensationalist claim does get shared between news sources, and is often printed in hundreds of papers
1153:
674:
488:
57:
1284:
1197:
1173:, per Dharmadhyaksha. It is the prime example of scandal-mongering which wikipedia tends to avoid.
1001:
862:
715:
646:
521:
462:
217:
174:
1069:
744:
686:
603:
563:
828:
Can you please provide me with any source which shows that these tapes are still talked about? -
1315:
1288:
1220:
1179:
1082:
1046:
979:
811:
619:
589:
415:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1358:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1241:
598:
I decided the AfD could use some more participation, but had not yet undeleted the article.
548:
492:
396:
354:
1207:
admit the Tehelka recordings as evidence because of dubious and inaccurate claims.(source:
1336:
1264:
1249:
1109:
1090:
735:
53:
1174:
1136:
1104:
just skeptical about anything called "The Truth" and there is really no problem at all!
795:
373:
332:
301:
234:
1237:
1126:
1065:
854:
741:
683:
666:
600:
581:
560:
458:
1307:
1212:
1042:
975:
858:
807:
615:
585:
407:
238:
113:
1273:
Crtew, I hope our discord here won't reflect on the amicable relation we share.
890:: In addition to substantial coverage in domestic and international news media,
842:
1306:) in the article where the subject is discussed. That really is all I can say.
1332:
1260:
1245:
1105:
1086:
850:" I dont know if they categories this under their serious or silly post. And
768:
Reply to the editor who posted a personal message to the admin after deletion
551:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
399:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
357:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
1131:
366:
325:
294:
1031:
Defend the Defenders, Resisting Attacks on Human Rights Activists in India
944:
Defend the Defenders, Resisting Attacks on Human Rights Activists in India
1129:. Good deal of secondary source coverage is demonstrated sufficiently. —
1081:
The new additions have brought the article to the point that satisfies
1027:
Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India
952:
Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India
896:
Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India
734:
That's a trivially answered question; I'm curious why you seem to be
1244:. The citation above is, in fact, already included in the article.
1183:. The whole thing and it's validity is pivoted upon the claims of
1352:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
924:
South Asian Media Cultures: Audiences, Representations, Contexts
1296:
mean we should start developing stand-alone articles on those
516:(Please sign your comments and also bold your opinion. The
484:
There are already many articles dealing with the subject .
920:
Breaking the big story: great moments in Indian journalism
1318:
1223:
642:
638:
633:
629:
109:
105:
101:
861:
also. We don't make articles on any and everything. §§
408:
173:
928:
Narratives of Gendered Dissent in South Asian Cinemas
960:
Field notes on democracy: listening to grasshoppers
770:: 1) Please read WP:GNG again because it also says
632:deleted the article at 15:11, 20 May 2013 and also
558:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
406:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
364:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
968:Violent gods: Hindu nationalism in India's present
702:in your induction period. Or should i debate that
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1366:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1148:, per the praise they got for this story, see
826:are all notable (and are hotly debated still)
187:
8:
319:Note: This debate has been included in the
288:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:roundup of media coverage about this report
1035:Apocalyptic Realm: Jihadists in South Asia
964:Apocalyptic Realm: Jihadists in South Asia
904:Apocalyptic Realm: Jihadists in South Asia
321:list of India-related deletion discussions
318:
287:
1200:but that doesn't make them true, does it?
671:Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories
290:list of News-related deletion discussions
900:The Making of India: A Political History
76:The Truth: Gujarat 2002 – Tehelka report
68:The Truth: Gujarat 2002 – Tehelka report
1039:My Hindu Faith and Periscope, Volume 1
940:Religion, Caste, and Politics in India
641:at 00:37, 21 May 2013 after which you
584:you deleted the page but relisted it?
1240:that the work of journalism received
1150:Encyclopedia of Social Movement Media
972:Encyclopedia of Social Movement Media
7:
775:now why this report is notable ? -
24:
714:with it, what will you merge? §§
1152:p521 onwards for more details.
443:(& that was hilarious one.)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1279:didn't get SIGCOV per se, the
1085:in notability and in quality!
1:
1283:got the coverage. Kindly see
802:. New York Times covered it
520:counts only bolded votes.) §§
267:Check out the last few paras
1180:Knowledge is not a newspaper
1029:by Parvis Ghassem-fachandi,
948:My Hindu Faith and Periscope
912:Attacks on the Press in 2007
798:. Amy Goodman discusses it
1175:Knowledge is not a soap box
1383:
1275:A minor observation: this
1041:by Satish C. Bhatnagar. -
1000:it in related articles. §§
344:18:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
313:18:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
281:08:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
263:08:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
247:22:59, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
226:10:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
208:08:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
645:at 01:00, 21 May 2013? §§
505:11:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
1355:Please do not modify it.
1341:09:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
1328:Investigative journalism
1322:09:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
1269:09:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
1254:09:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
1227:09:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
1162:09:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
1141:06:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
1114:13:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
1095:12:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
1074:11:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
1051:21:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
1033:edited by Harsh Dobhal,
1016:10:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
984:08:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
956:The Rough Guide to India
908:India Since Independence
877:14:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
838:14:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
816:13:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
785:07:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
751:14:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
730:11:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
693:11:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
661:04:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
624:01:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
610:01:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
594:01:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
570:01:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
536:04:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
477:11:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
455:Gulbarg Society massacre
430:01:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
62:23:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
385:10:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
996:? We are also already
679:9/11 Commission Report
451:Naroda Patiya massacre
1304:2002 Gujarat Violence
1171:2002 Gujarat Violence
447:2002 Gujarat violence
675:September 11 attacks
639:personal note to you
1191:(who performed the
916:Tehelka As Metaphor
708:NACA Report No. 133
704:NACA Report No. 761
700:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1125:, essentially per
932:South Asian Cinema
48:The result was
634:closed the debate
572:
538:
508:
491:comment added by
432:
387:
346:
315:
1374:
1357:
1320:
1313:
1310:
1225:
1218:
1215:
1210:
1025:by Alka Kurian,
1004:
865:
747:
718:
689:
649:
643:reopened the AFD
606:
566:
557:
553:
524:
518:AfD Vote counter
515:
507:
485:
465:
444:
426:
420:
412:
405:
401:
383:
381:
376:
371:
363:
359:
342:
340:
335:
330:
311:
309:
304:
299:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1364:deletion review
1353:
1317:
1311:
1308:
1222:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1169:- and merge to
1154:Darkness Shines
1037:by Dilip Hiro,
1002:
863:
843:About SAJAforum
745:
716:
687:
667:deletion review
647:
604:
564:
546:
522:
486:
463:
442:
424:
416:
394:
379:
374:
367:
365:
352:
338:
333:
326:
324:
307:
302:
295:
293:
216:: Not notable.
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1380:
1378:
1369:
1368:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1301:
1274:
1256:
1230:
1229:
1164:
1143:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1098:
1097:
1076:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1003:Dharmadhyaksha
987:
986:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
864:Dharmadhyaksha
852:people discuss
819:
818:
788:
787:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
717:Dharmadhyaksha
648:Dharmadhyaksha
575:
574:
573:
555:
554:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
523:Dharmadhyaksha
510:
509:
479:
464:Dharmadhyaksha
435:
434:
433:
403:
402:
391:
390:
389:
388:
361:
360:
349:
348:
347:
316:
285:
284:
283:
250:
249:
228:
218:Yogesh Khandke
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1379:
1367:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1350:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1305:
1299:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1206:
1201:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1189:Ashish Khetan
1186:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1064:per Anirvan.
1063:
1060:
1059:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:Indian Cinema
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
988:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
886:
885:
878:
874:
870:
866:
860:
856:
855:Aishwarya Rai
853:
849:
844:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
790:
789:
786:
782:
778:
773:
769:
766:
752:
749:
748:
743:
737:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
713:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
694:
691:
690:
685:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
650:
644:
640:
635:
631:
627:
626:
625:
622:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
608:
607:
602:
597:
596:
595:
592:
591:
587:
583:
582:User:LFaraone
580:
577:
576:
571:
568:
567:
562:
556:
552:
550:
545:
544:
537:
533:
529:
525:
519:
514:
513:
512:
511:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
460:
459:Narendra Modi
457:and a bit at
456:
452:
448:
440:
437:
436:
431:
427:
421:
419:
413:
411:
404:
400:
398:
393:
392:
386:
382:
377:
372:
370:
362:
358:
356:
351:
350:
345:
341:
336:
331:
329:
322:
317:
314:
310:
305:
300:
298:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1354:
1351:
1300:themselves?
1297:
1292:
1285:WP:109PAPERS
1280:
1276:
1204:
1196:
1195:operation).
1192:
1188:
1184:
1178:
1166:
1149:
1145:
1130:
1122:
1078:
1061:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
997:
993:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
859:Karva Chauth
846:
825:
791:
771:
767:
740:
711:
682:
618:
599:
588:
578:
559:
547:
487:— Preceding
481:
438:
417:
409:
395:
368:
353:
327:
296:
230:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
936:First Draft
493:Shyamsunder
231:Strong Keep
161:free images
1293:verifiable
1291:. Not all
1289:WP:NOTNEWS
1281:allegation
1083:WP:Heymann
998:mentioning
614:Ah, okay.
54:Black Kite
1360:talk page
1242:WP:SIGCOV
736:WP:POINTy
37:talk page
1362:or in a
1066:Aurorion
848:readers.
830:sarvajna
777:sarvajna
549:Relisted
501:contribs
489:unsigned
397:Relisted
355:Relisted
273:sarvajna
255:sarvajna
200:sarvajna
120:View log
39:or in a
1298:reports
1205:did not
1043:Anirvan
994:mention
976:Anirvan
888:Comment
808:Chaipau
746:Faraone
712:dealing
688:Faraone
605:Faraone
579:Comment
565:Faraone
410:Mediran
239:Anirvan
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
1277:report
1238:WP:GNG
1167:Delete
1127:WP:HEY
482:Delete
439:Delete
214:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
1333:Crtew
1261:Crtew
1246:Crtew
1193:sting
1106:Crtew
1087:Crtew
706:were
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
1337:talk
1287:and
1265:talk
1250:talk
1187:man
1158:talk
1146:Keep
1137:talk
1132:Cirt
1123:Keep
1110:talk
1091:talk
1079:Keep
1070:talk
1062:Keep
1047:talk
1006:§§ {
980:talk
867:§§ {
834:talk
812:talk
804:here
800:here
796:here
792:Keep
781:talk
720:§§ {
677:and
651:§§ {
628:You
616:Ansh
586:Ansh
526:§§ {
497:talk
467:§§ {
461:. §§
369:czar
328:czar
297:czar
277:talk
269:here
259:talk
243:talk
222:talk
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
1185:one
857:'s
845:: "
630:had
620:666
590:666
189:TWL
118:– (
1339:)
1309:Mr
1267:)
1252:)
1214:Mr
1211:)
1177:.
1160:)
1139:)
1112:)
1093:)
1072:)
1049:)
1014:}
982:)
970:,
966:,
962:,
958:,
954:,
950:,
946:,
942:,
938:,
934:,
930:,
926:,
922:,
918:,
914:,
910:,
906:,
902:,
898:,
875:}
836:)
814:)
783:)
728:}
659:}
534:}
503:)
499:•
475:}
453:,
449:,
428:)
422:•
323:.
292:.
279:)
261:)
245:)
224:)
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
1335:(
1312:T
1263:(
1248:(
1217:T
1156:(
1135:(
1108:(
1089:(
1068:(
1045:(
1012:C
1010:/
1008:T
978:(
894:(
873:C
871:/
869:T
832:(
810:(
779:(
742:L
726:C
724:/
722:T
684:L
657:C
655:/
653:T
601:L
561:L
532:C
530:/
528:T
495:(
473:C
471:/
469:T
425:c
418:t
414:(
380:·
375:·
339:·
334:·
308:·
303:·
275:(
257:(
241:(
220:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.