465:
156:
I volunteered to rewrite this article after a previous version by another editor was deleted as G11. Clearly, the self-promotional issues that doomed the earlier article were removed here. What remains now is a decent little stub. The article passes
503:
news coverage in the U.S. For those who did not read it, the article is about the emerging church movement and The Well was the first church cited in the article -- not exactly non-notable.
125:
186:. Unlike the nom's stipulation, the Knight Ridder Newspapers article goes far beyond "it exists." Curiously, this is the nom's only argument to delete this article. --
540:
as thanks to
Ecoleetage the article now has six sources and therefore establishes notability. Also, it gets plenty of Google news hits (see
92:
87:
273:
itself most churches are notable. In keeping with the fact that AfD is a discussion rather than a vote, maybe you could cite some policy? A
96:
541:
79:
499:
Thanks, MQS. The
Bradenton Herald coverage is also part of the Knight-Ridder news syndicate, which means this article received
17:
49:
203:
mostly per
Ecoleetage. The sources show exactly how this is notable, such as the Knight-Ridder news articles of the
579:
485:
36:
578:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
564:
547:
532:
512:
490:
448:
430:
409:
392:
371:
350:
327:
304:
286:
264:
246:
229:
195:
174:
147:
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
165:
movement. Its notability for its off-beat setting and services are also clearly cited in the media coverage.
83:
140:
75:
67:
508:
478:
323:
260:
170:
426:
367:
282:
237:
non-notable church. Maybe we should add every church, business, store, 7-eleven, just to be fair?--
221:
560:
405:
191:
57:
440:
296:
238:
346:
134:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
380:
359:
311:
292:
270:
161:
without problem, and the Knight-Ridder news article cites it as being prominent within the
525:
504:
387:
319:
256:
204:
166:
162:
269:
Kudos on the response, Eco :P. T85:While we shouldn't add "every" church, if you look at
444:
436:
422:
363:
300:
278:
274:
242:
212:
556:
544:
469:
401:
187:
53:
342:
158:
132:
Non-notable church. Only one reliable source, and that just says that it exists.
113:
295::1. no, 2. no, 3. no, 4. no, 5. no, 6. no, 7. no, 8. no, 9. no, 10. no, 11. no --
473:
208:
183:
255:
Maybe you can provide an explanation of your !vote...just to be fair?
524:
Ecoleetage has done a fine job of proving this church's notability.
435:
Ask for ref to back up claim of being notable under guideline 4 per
572:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
476:. Ecoleetage did a nice job of bringing this article into line.
464:
Beyond the several nice refs used in the article, I also found
555:
Meets GNG after sourcing improvement. Still needs cleanup.
362:. Prominent within the emergin church movement=guideline 4.
207:
movement, so there is no reason to delete. Easily passes
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
582:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
400:per T*85 as a non-notable church.
24:
291:Going by the refs given, under
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
565:18:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
548:17:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
533:12:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
513:12:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
491:05:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
449:05:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
431:05:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
410:04:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
393:04:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
372:04:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
351:04:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
328:12:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
305:04:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
287:04:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
265:04:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
247:04:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
230:02:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
196:02:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
175:02:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
148:02:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
62:02:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
419:Ask for reasoning and policy
383:is not a guideline, right?
599:
575:Please do not modify it.
379:- You guys realise that
32:Please do not modify it.
277:argument hardly helps.
182:- Sufficiently passes
136:Little Red Riding Hood
472:this article passes
466:The Bradenton Herald
358:. per the pass of
341:, per Ecoleetage.
44:The result was
76:The Well (church)
68:The Well (church)
50:non-admin closure
590:
577:
530:
481:
391:
226:
218:
146:
143:
137:
123:
117:
99:
34:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:deletion review
573:
526:
479:
402:X MarX the Spot
384:
222:
213:
205:emerging church
163:emerging church
141:
135:
133:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
585:
584:
568:
567:
550:
535:
518:
517:
516:
515:
494:
493:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
451:
413:
412:
395:
374:
353:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
309:
308:
307:
275:Slippery slope
250:
249:
232:
198:
177:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
583:
581:
576:
570:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
549:
546:
542:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
523:
520:
519:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
492:
489:
488:
487:
483:
482:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
394:
390:
389:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
227:
225:
219:
216:
210:
206:
202:
199:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
152:
151:
150:
149:
145:
144:
138:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
574:
571:
552:
537:
527:
521:
500:
486:
484:
477:
461:
418:
397:
385:
376:
355:
338:
315:
234:
223:
214:
200:
179:
153:
139:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
154:Strong Keep
505:Ecoleetage
421:Per T*85.
320:Ecoleetage
257:Ecoleetage
209:notability
167:Ecoleetage
437:Ironholds
423:Ironholds
381:WP:CHURCH
364:Ironholds
360:WP:CHURCH
312:WP:CHURCH
293:WP:CHURCH
279:Ironholds
271:WP:CHURCH
557:Jclemens
545:A Nobody
501:national
480:Schmidt,
188:Oakshade
126:View log
54:Icewedge
377:Comment
343:Johnfos
93:protect
88:history
543:). --
470:WP:GNG
468:. Per
398:Delete
314:is an
235:Delete
121:delete
97:delete
388:neuro
316:essay
217:Cross
159:WP:RS
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
561:talk
553:Keep
538:Keep
522:Keep
509:talk
474:WP:N
462:Keep
445:talk
441:T*85
427:talk
406:talk
368:talk
356:Keep
347:talk
339:Keep
324:talk
301:talk
297:T*85
283:talk
261:talk
243:talk
239:T*85
224:talk
215:Ryan
211:. –
201:Keep
192:talk
184:WP:N
180:Keep
171:talk
142:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
528:Sam
48:. (
563:)
511:)
447:)
439:--
429:)
408:)
386:—
370:)
349:)
326:)
318:.
303:)
285:)
263:)
245:)
228:)
194:)
173:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
559:(
507:(
443:(
425:(
404:(
366:(
345:(
322:(
299:(
281:(
259:(
241:(
220:(
190:(
169:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.