303:
I removed about 50% of the article, all completely unsourced that was massively promo and somewhat in-universe in nature, prior to nomination. After removing that, there is hardly anything there, and much of what is is also unsourced and unsourcable to anything other than a primary, connected
222:. Only source I find that speaks to notability is the SFGATE source and that is barely. It was deleted in 2009 and I don't see much more here to show notability. Some passing mentions, some staff change announcements, but nothing in detail.
187:
86:
442:
Another one of many iHeart's 'cover all the bases' morning shows for markets who can't afford local talent. What isn't said at the start of the article is it pretty much bombed in 2006 as part of the failed
447:
hot talk format, and since then it's stayed on the edges of radio where it's not popular enough to merit attention outside cheap stunts. There just isn't the sourcing here to pass
140:
239:
181:
81:
258:
147:
318:
I agree that it's a very weak case. A claim of notability for one of "Woody, Ravey, Greg, and Menace" would be interesting if anyone has one.
113:
108:
483:
There are thousands of local radio stations and shows around the country. This one being syndicated still does not prove notability.
17:
304:
source. A piece of gossip, essentially one unqualified and one qualified opinion, do not really speak much to notability, do they?
117:
487:
475:
432:
401:
372:
327:
313:
295:
269:
250:
231:
65:
284:
100:
283:
is a guideline here. The article has content issues, but LA is a big enough market that morning shows are likely notable; and
202:
169:
410:
381:
506:
355:
that there's enough sourcing to get the show over GNG, but the sourcing here is far too dependent on the station's own
40:
309:
227:
163:
159:
351:
presumption of notability for a radio show just because it's in a major media market — the article has to
323:
291:
104:
502:
305:
223:
36:
209:
356:
96:
71:
466:
195:
280:
368:
319:
287:
263:
244:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
175:
344:
219:
59:
454:
426:
448:
484:
392:
364:
134:
339:
unless the article sees significant sourcing improvement. While it's certainly
54:
421:
444:
495:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
413:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
384:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
343:
that a major media market radio show might be able to clear
360:
130:
126:
122:
194:
359:
press releases about itself and not nearly enough on
87:
Articles for deletion/The Woody Show (2nd nomination)
390:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
419:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
208:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
509:). No further edits should be made to this page.
240:list of California-related deletion discussions
8:
257:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
256:
237:
79:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
82:Articles for deletion/The Woody Show
78:
363:coverage in unaffiliated sources.
24:
1:
488:22:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
476:21:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
433:20:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
402:01:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
286:is some (gossip) coverage.
66:07:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
526:
373:21:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
328:05:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
314:21:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
296:21:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
270:11:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
251:11:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
232:06:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
498:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
347:, RPRGM provides no
473:
435:
404:
272:
253:
517:
500:
474:
469:
463:
462:
457:
424:
418:
416:
414:
398:
395:
389:
387:
385:
306:John from Idegon
268:
249:
224:John from Idegon
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
62:
57:
34:
525:
524:
520:
519:
518:
516:
515:
514:
513:
507:deletion review
496:
467:
460:
455:
452:
436:
422:
409:
407:
405:
396:
393:
380:
378:
361:reliable source
262:
243:
155:
146:
111:
95:
92:
75:
60:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
523:
521:
512:
511:
491:
490:
478:
417:
406:
388:
377:
376:
375:
357:self-published
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
274:
273:
254:
216:
215:
152:
97:The Woody Show
91:
90:
89:
84:
76:
74:
72:The Woody Show
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
522:
510:
508:
504:
499:
493:
492:
489:
486:
482:
479:
477:
472:
470:
459:
458:
450:
446:
441:
438:
437:
434:
431:
430:
429:
425:
415:
412:
403:
400:
399:
386:
383:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
266:
260:
255:
252:
248:
247:
241:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
497:
494:
480:
464:
453:
439:
427:
420:
408:
391:
379:
352:
348:
340:
336:
320:Power~enwiki
300:
288:Power~enwiki
277:
265:CAPTAIN RAJU
264:
246:CAPTAIN RAJU
245:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
353:demonstrate
182:free images
503:talk page
349:automatic
341:plausible
278:Weak Keep
37:talk page
505:or in a
485:Reywas92
411:Relisted
382:Relisted
281:WP:RPRGM
141:View log
39:or in a
468:chatter
445:Free FM
365:Bearcat
301:Comment
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
481:Delete
440:Delete
345:WP:GNG
337:Delete
220:WP:GNG
218:Fails
160:Google
118:delete
50:delete
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
16:<
456:Nate
449:WP:N
397:2014
369:talk
324:talk
310:talk
292:talk
228:talk
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
428:947
394:MRD
210:TWL
139:– (
61:Why
52:.
451:.
371:)
326:)
312:)
294:)
261:.
242:.
230:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
56:So
471:)
465:(
461:•
423:J
367:(
322:(
308:(
290:(
226:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.