172:(article creator). I have been a Knowledge user for some time, and as someone who was not in any way involved in the production, I resent that insinuation. I added it to List of zombie films because it's a zombie film. I never added anything to the Romero page, and I only added something to Diary of the Dead because people have claimed that The Zombie Diaries stole Romero's idea. (In fact, Zombie Diaries had completed filming before Diary of the Dead was even announced.) I notice that there is a fan backlash against this film, and that may be part of the reason why this AfD has been raised. The film was a major part of Fright Fest, and has had coverage by numerous sources independent of the production, including
140:
for almost a year. There is no actual movement behind this film. It is the filmmakers spreading word on various message boards and asking others to spam
Knowledge on their behalf. It had a very small showing in England in a single theater and then went direct to (self-financed) DVD. Nothing of note
196:
boards on this film, most of the people who have an axe to grind about the film are big fans of Romero's work, who complain about the DVD's cover not being representative of the film itself. 10:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
344:
is an interesting and refreshingly different take on the zombie theme, recently given a full DVD release in the UK. Low budget or otherwise, it exists, and deserves as much recognition as any other independant film.
328:, and has numerous reviews as already mentioned. Which is a lot of coverage for an independent film. Appears to have enough reviews to satisfy film notability, and definitely satisfies general.
188:. I would like to see some evidence of filmmakers asking people to spam Knowledge, because I've never seen any. The DVD, so far as I can tell, was not self-financed. It was released through
121:
261:- Movie itself has gotten some press, but the spamming is real. I don't think it is appropriate to punish these no-talent spammers by deleting their movie.
303:
323:
186:
94:
89:
98:
81:
212:
366:
362:
340:
This may indeed be a low-budget film, but it makes no attempt to hide that or to present itself as something it isn't. What it
17:
289:
its on IMDB which means it has some notability, It also for sale on Amazon UK, though all the reviews seem pretty bad.
242:
386:
36:
349:
332:
313:
293:
281:
269:
249:
236:
164:
149:
63:
385:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
159:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
85:
208:
189:
358:
266:
200:
129:
354:
346:
326:
278:
234:
147:
77:
69:
241:
Clearly those edits were unacceptable, and abuse of
Knowledge. However they were not me. Please
246:
204:
137:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
329:
133:
265:
the movie, but monitor the "what links here" for illegitimate linking until they stop.
179:
229:
142:
177:
49:
183:
115:
310:
290:
173:
245:. Thanks. Apologies for not signing my previous post. Slipped my mind!
379:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
193:
185:
which are not just limited to the UK. Even BBC News covered it
128:
Non-notable independent film. These guys have been spamming
181:
226:
224:
222:
220:
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:This is a notable film. Don't be Americo-centric.
389:). No further edits should be made to this page.
325:, the film was also covered by ABC (Australia)
192:. From what I can tell from the heavily-active
219:Evidence of Knowledge spamming and promotion:
8:
322:In addition to the BBC article mentioned
302:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
350:17:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
333:14:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
314:22:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
304:list of Film-related deletions
64:00:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
294:22:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
282:07:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
270:01:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
250:07:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
237:17:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
165:21:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
150:12:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
406:
382:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
190:Revolver Entertainment
367:few or no other edits
130:List of zombie films
369:outside this topic.
78:The Zombie Diaries
70:The Zombie Diaries
370:
316:
307:
243:assume good faith
216:
203:comment added by
138:Diary of the Dead
62:
397:
384:
352:
308:
298:
198:
162:
134:George A. Romero
119:
101:
59:
56:
53:
34:
405:
404:
400:
399:
398:
396:
395:
394:
393:
387:deletion review
380:
311:John Vandenberg
160:
158:Not notable. •
92:
76:
73:
54:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
403:
401:
392:
391:
374:
372:
371:
335:
317:
296:
284:
272:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
167:
161:Lawrence Cohen
126:
125:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
402:
390:
388:
383:
377:
376:
375:
368:
364:
360:
356:
351:
348:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
305:
301:
297:
295:
292:
288:
285:
283:
280:
276:
273:
271:
268:
264:
260:
257:
251:
248:
244:
240:
239:
238:
235:
233:
232:
227:
225:
223:
221:
218:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
195:
191:
187:
184:
182:
180:
178:
175:
171:
168:
166:
163:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
146:
145:
139:
135:
131:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
58:
57:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
381:
378:
373:
341:
337:
319:
299:
286:
274:
262:
258:
247:Poker Flunky
230:
205:Poker Flunky
169:
155:
143:
127:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
365:) has made
330:Horrorshowj
199:—Preceding
176:and others
267:SolidPlaid
174:Kim Newman
355:revolting
347:revolting
287:weak keep
363:contribs
231:IrishGuy
213:contribs
201:unsigned
144:IrishGuy
122:View log
259:Comment
156:Delete.
95:protect
90:history
291:Sherzo
279:Wryspy
141:here.
99:delete
275:Keep.
116:views
108:watch
104:links
46:keep.
16:<
359:talk
338:Keep
320:Keep
300:Note
263:Keep
209:talk
194:IMDb
170:Keep
136:and
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
52:Citi
309:--
306:.
120:– (
55:Cat
361:•
353:—
342:is
228:.
215:)
211:•
132:,
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
357:(
207:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.