350:, obviously, for several reasons. The article was tagged for speedy deletion on several grounds, including G11 (unambiguous promotion). HJ Mitchell removed teh speedy deeltion tag, saying (among other things) that it "doesn't seem to be advertising anything". I find this odd: it is clearly promoting Jodi Dean's views, and arguably her essay. Certainly delete, and I should have said speedy delete.
255:- I had a look for references which discuss this essay, without much luck, as it seems to have very little traction on the web at present. I think there is the problem of notability; neither the essay writer nor apparently her 9 published works currently have articles . The article, if kept, would require vast improvement: the "content" section seems to make very little sense. --
370:
WP article. It came out over three years ago in the 3rd edition of an introductory reader. It is of extremely marginal importantance in terms of her own academic output and would not even be worth covering in an article about her. Dean has written multiple articles in peer reviewed journals and several full-length books, one of which,
190:
This article has a huge number of problems. First, it seems to be written about some essay that has no third-party sources. Therefore, there is not indication that the topic is important. Second, the only "reference" is the topic itself; third, it seems to be pushing a point: the point that the essay
369:
The article should definitely be deleted, but it's certainly not promoting her views, because the article's creator (for whom
English is pretty clearly their second language) has not understood them at all and simply put together some garbled quotes. Also the article is not "recent" as stated in the
331:. Frankly the introduction is still closely paraphrased from that conferance speaker's blurb and the rest is basically quotes from the article itself and two other unpublished manuscripts by lord knows who (both were downloaded from blogs).
159:
212:- Article appears to be an essay, or about an essay, and in either case there is no evidence of notability. Article has insufficient context to allow other editors to meaningfully expand the article. -
284:
309:: I think if anyone was wedded to the idea of keeping, that this could be turned into an article about the professor rather than the essay, which does seem to be....shall we say 'fringe'.
153:
115:
88:
83:
281:
231:
92:
75:
290:
174:
141:
191:
itself is making. There is simply nothing encyclopedic here, and this should fall under some CSD (like essays) that doesn't yet exist. —
292:) but this chapter in an introductory level reader is definitely not. I'm wondering if this is part of a school or college project.
17:
403:
359:
340:
318:
301:
268:
246:
221:
203:
135:
57:
131:
79:
416:
36:
314:
181:
120:
71:
63:
263:
242:
415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
384:
217:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:– The subject of this article is apparently a specific article of the same name by Jodi Dean which appears in
147:
399:
355:
336:
310:
297:
280:. Simon During (ed.). London: Routledge, 2007. Her article is not notable in itself in terms of citations
199:
53:
257:
238:
380:
213:
193:
167:
395:
351:
332:
293:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
286:, or even reviews. Dean herself might be notable enough as an academic for a WP article (
394:. If the intention was to "promote" her work, this article definitely doesn't do that.
376:
374:(Cornell University Press) was reviewed not only in academic journals but also in the
388:
287:
109:
328:
This article has aleady been deleted once (yesterday) for copyright infringement
372:
Aliens in
America: Conspiracy Cultures from Outerspace to Cyberspace
390:
and most major US papers. She has just published her latest book,
409:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
392:
Blog Theory: Feedback and
Capture in the Circuits of Drive
329:
105:
101:
97:
166:
180:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:). No further edits should be made to this page.
232:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
226:
230:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
72:The net and Multiple Realities
64:The net and Multiple Realities
1:
341:16:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
319:15:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
302:15:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
269:14:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
247:00:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
222:23:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
204:19:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
404:14:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
360:13:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
58:00:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
278:The Cultural Studies Reader
436:
412:Please do not modify it.
385:New York Review of Books
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
311:Elen of the Roads
249:
235:
202:
427:
414:
267:
260:
236:
198:
192:
185:
184:
170:
123:
113:
95:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
423:
417:deletion review
410:
266:
259:Kateshortforbob
258:
256:
239:Jclemens-public
196:
127:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
422:
421:
406:
377:New York Times
363:
362:
344:
343:
322:
321:
304:
271:
262:
250:
224:
214:DustFormsWords
188:
187:
124:
121:Afd statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
420:
418:
413:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
387:
386:
381:
379:
378:
373:
368:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
345:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
324:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
270:
265:
261:
254:
251:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
195:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
408:
396:Voceditenore
391:
383:
375:
371:
366:
352:JamesBWatson
347:
333:Voceditenore
325:
306:
294:Voceditenore
277:
273:
252:
227:
209:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
154:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
194:Timneu22
116:View log
367:Comment
307:Comment
160:WP refs
148:scholar
89:protect
84:history
382:, the
348:Delete
274:Delete
253:Delete
210:Delete
132:Google
93:delete
46:delete
175:JSTOR
136:books
118:) •
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
400:talk
356:talk
337:talk
326:Note
315:talk
298:talk
264:talk
243:talk
228:Note
218:talk
200:talk
168:FENS
142:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
237:--
182:TWL
114:– (
402:)
358:)
339:)
317:)
300:)
289:,
283:,
245:)
234:.
220:)
162:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
398:(
354:(
335:(
313:(
296:(
241:(
216:(
197:·
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.