639:. OK Sorry! I assumed what the movies title states just like you are assuming a lot of anti-article things without watching the videos, and now I stand by my assertion that your and mine reactions are not different at all brother.
149:
531:. Article is advertisement for non-notable You-Tube videos. "See Also" links to this are being spammed into other non-related articles (ie, further evidence of advertisement-quality of article.)
257:
Very sorry, but google analytics aren't considered a "reliable source." Any marketing company can initiate a marketing surge on search engines, which is why reliable sources are explained here:
446:. The series is about conspiracy theories and cites numerous references. May I suggest the deletion suggester check these first, as it's easier for him to understand if its appropriate or not.
425:
Many of the incoming links need to be killed regardless of whether it's notable. May I suggest the article creator remove those first, as it's easier for him to revert his own changes.
143:
110:
505:
But
Dispute yes here is dear brother, You can never compare and then assertively decide 2 things to be non-related when you haven't even checked one's contents.
240:. Here is the evidence of notability. Google Insight for search proves that "The arrivals" reaches to Breakout breakout point with several search key terms:
83:
78:
87:
551:
There are many many articles about commercial films, why are they not considered as advertisements and non-profitable You-Tube videos are ?
315:
244:
70:
180:
Not notable collection of video shorts. No in-article reliable sources to judge notability, and search results turn up only blog entries.
361:
280:
199:
612:
has, in spite of your assumptions about the film's title, absolutely nothing to do with an antichrist or alien invasions. (Opinions on
314:. These videos are free and intended to spread knowledge, just like wikipedia, so these can not be considered as advertisement. --
164:
421:
it became notable, it could be recreated, but most of the current content would still need to be pruned as advertising material.
131:
17:
225:
554:
Secondly if you don't even know about the contents of the videos then how are you deciding that they are non-related ?
464:
notable in order for it to be appropriate as a #See also. As I question its notability, I can assert that it is not
125:
698:
675:
648:
625:
590:
563:
540:
514:
475:
455:
438:
405:
366:
337:
323:
306:
285:
252:
230:
204:
52:
715:
36:
121:
714:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
573:
There seem to be no references to this video, other than in blogs and in
Knowledge echos. Notability requires
319:
248:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
74:
171:
695:
621:
587:
536:
472:
435:
66:
58:
297:. Nothing here. The link provided above (editor, please sign your posts) does not establish anything.
241:
671:
644:
570:
There are many commercial films whose articles have been deleted or rejected for not being notable.
559:
510:
451:
401:
157:
613:
354:
343:
273:
262:
219:
192:
181:
137:
49:
342:
And the article wasn't nominated for being spam, it was nominated for not yet being notable. --
692:
617:
609:
584:
532:
469:
432:
428:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
333:
302:
667:
640:
555:
506:
447:
397:
691:
should be in the article. Questions as to the latter should be on the talk page. —
214:
579:
258:
104:
329:
298:
664:
610:
John
Tuturro comedy about a 19th century theater troupe in New York City
660:
Should we take this discussion to the articles discussion page ???
708:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
427:
I found this AfD because of the clearly inappropriate link from
328:
Not all ads are intended to bring immediate financial gain.
100:
96:
92:
156:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
718:). No further edits should be made to this page.
665:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:The_arrivals_series
170:
8:
616:not withstanding.) I stand by my assertion.
494:Dispute = No in #See also link Removal.
687:there should be an article, not as to
468:notable with much fear of dispute. —
7:
389:Necessary Content description added.
24:
683:Why? It goes to the question of
392:In Article references inserted.
213:. No evidence of notability. —
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
699:21:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
676:19:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
649:19:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
626:19:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
591:18:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
564:18:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
541:17:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
515:19:23, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
476:18:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
456:18:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
439:17:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
406:09:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
367:08:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
338:15:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
324:09:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
307:05:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
286:05:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
253:09:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
231:13:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
205:10:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
53:02:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
735:
383:Various References added.
711:Please do not modify it.
386:All Videos links placed.
32:Please do not modify it.
460:It would have to be
67:The arrivals series
59:The arrivals series
614:Christopher Walken
44:The result was
429:conspiracy theory
726:
713:
364:
357:
350:
283:
276:
269:
229:
202:
195:
188:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
734:
733:
729:
728:
727:
725:
724:
723:
722:
716:deletion review
709:
362:
355:
344:
281:
274:
263:
217:
200:
193:
182:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
732:
730:
721:
720:
704:
703:
702:
701:
662:
661:
656:
654:
653:
652:
651:
631:
630:
629:
628:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
571:
552:
549:
524:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
498:
497:
496:
495:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
441:
411:
410:
409:
408:
394:
393:
390:
387:
384:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
340:
316:115.186.27.122
291:
290:
289:
288:
245:115.186.27.122
234:
233:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
731:
719:
717:
712:
706:
705:
700:
697:
694:
690:
686:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
673:
669:
666:
659:
658:
657:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:
633:
632:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
604:
603:
602:
601:
592:
589:
586:
582:
581:
576:
572:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
547:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
526:
525:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
493:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
477:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
445:
442:
440:
437:
434:
430:
426:
423:
422:
420:
416:
413:
412:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
391:
388:
385:
382:
381:
379:
376:
375:
368:
365:
360:
359:
358:
351:
349:
348:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
292:
287:
284:
279:
278:
277:
270:
268:
267:
260:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
236:
235:
232:
227:
224:
221:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
203:
198:
197:
196:
189:
187:
186:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
710:
707:
693:Arthur Rubin
688:
684:
663:
655:
636:
618:J. Van Meter
605:
585:Arthur Rubin
583:sources. —
578:
574:
545:
533:J. Van Meter
528:
523:
491:
484:
470:Arthur Rubin
466:particularly
465:
462:particularly
461:
443:
433:Arthur Rubin
424:
418:
414:
377:
353:
352:
346:
345:
311:
294:
272:
271:
265:
264:
237:
222:
210:
191:
190:
184:
183:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
144:free images
668:ALI ASSAD
641:ALI ASSAD
556:ALI ASSAD
507:ALI ASSAD
448:ALI ASSAD
398:ALI ASSAD
580:reliable
575:external
356:Twisted
275:Twisted
226:contribs
215:RHaworth
194:Twisted
111:View log
50:MuZemike
685:whether
546:Comment
444:Comment
363:(Stuff)
312:Comment
282:(Stuff)
201:(Stuff)
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
696:(talk)
588:(talk)
529:Delete
473:(talk)
436:(talk)
415:Delete
347:Oliver
330:Drmies
299:Drmies
295:Delete
266:Oliver
211:Delete
185:Oliver
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
637:Reply
608:. A
606:Reply
492:Reply
431:. —
259:WP:RS
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
689:what
672:talk
645:talk
622:talk
560:talk
537:talk
511:talk
452:talk
402:talk
378:Keep
334:talk
320:talk
303:talk
261:. --
249:talk
238:Keep
220:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
417:.
172:TWL
109:– (
674:)
647:)
624:)
577:,
562:)
539:)
513:)
454:)
419:If
404:)
380:.
336:)
322:)
305:)
251:)
243:--
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
670:(
643:(
620:(
558:(
548:.
535:(
509:(
450:(
400:(
332:(
318:(
301:(
247:(
228:)
223:·
218:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.