Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The distance (boxing) - Knowledge

Source 📝

308:--an entry from a dictionary of slang, if only to emphasize the DICDEF quality of the subject. The rest of the article has, really, nothing to do at all with the ostensible subject. It's a bad dictionary definition, with some unrelated stuff thrown in by way of synthesis. Oh, "the distance" is not a good search term (to be left after renaming), since more often than note that term means something like to the length of a fighter's arm, for instance. 410:. This is not just a dictionary definition as the nominator says and includes both history and popular culture. However, at the time of the nomination, these were not made clear in the article as it was all one block of text--that's now been changed as I've broken it into sections. I've also added a bunch of sources. It's hard to find google results for "the distance" because of all the false positives, however, you can find tons of results for 442:
or some such, that this be treated historically, and that the phrase "going the distance" be parenthetically defined and included in that presentation. That makes sense to me as an inclusion-worthy encyclopedia article and it should be easily sourceable to get past any potential notability challenge.
305: 338:? Turning these technical sporting details into articles is just a matter of doing a little hard editing work and I am confident I could improve any or all of them. How does turning these into red links build the encyclopedia and assist our readers? Per our 370:- Dicdef?!?! Never heard that one before... This is an original essay, a dictionary definition of a slang term in verbose form... While one could write an encyclopedic article on the evolution of title fight duration over the years, 346:, which already mentions this topic? How is deletion superior to that way forward? As I'm little busy right now, I shall tag the article for rescue and see if we can attract some editors with knowledge of the history of boxing. 304:. Wow. Colonel, you can't make this work. The phrase is used in a few books on boxing, yes, and that's it--enough to support a Wiktionary entry. The 'reference' you added is only a mention, and I am surprised that you didn't find 162: 443:
The article is currently structured backwards, I think, as a dictionary definition of the slang phrase, followed by a hurried attempt to rationalize this with dribs and drabs of boxing history.
156: 117: 250: 414:, which a specific type of boxing distance pertaining to championships, which has 23,400 results. I will continue to improve the article after this post. — 122: 90: 85: 94: 77: 198: 177: 144: 411: 17: 228: 138: 134: 452: 439: 429: 400: 382: 355: 317: 293: 265: 240: 220: 202: 59: 81: 467: 184: 36: 466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
351: 216: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
236: 289: 73: 65: 150: 438:
I would suggest that the approach of the article be flipped — that a new article be launched called
422: 347: 212: 170: 339: 448: 378: 261: 232: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396: 388: 313: 285: 276: 331: 415: 55: 444: 374: 257: 111: 392: 327: 309: 387:
It's WP slang. Someone should write a Knowledge article on it. Oh wait, see
50: 335: 343: 279:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
460:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
211:
Adding a source was easy and it's not a dictionary definition.
231:
and expand that aspect. The present title is too dictdef'y.
326:
Would you use the same arguments to delete the articles
107: 103: 99: 169: 284:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 470:). No further edits should be made to this page. 183: 8: 251:list of Sports-related deletion discussions 245: 372:this ain't it and doesn't pretend to try. 249:: This debate has been included in the 229:History of the length of boxing matches 7: 342:, why shouldn't we merge this with 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 453:17:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 440:championship distance (boxing) 430:14:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 401:03:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 383:03:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 356:07:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 318:01:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 294:00:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 266:01:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 60:02:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 241:03:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 221:00:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 203:22:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 412:"the championship distance" 487: 463:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 74:The distance (boxing) 66:The distance (boxing) 193:Dicdef, no sources. 201:and a clue-bat • 44:The result was 296: 268: 254: 478: 465: 427: 420: 389:Knowledge:Dicdef 283: 281: 255: 196: 195:Ten Pound Hammer 188: 187: 173: 125: 115: 97: 34: 486: 485: 481: 480: 479: 477: 476: 475: 474: 468:deletion review 461: 423: 416: 332:points decision 274: 194: 130: 121: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 484: 482: 473: 472: 457: 456: 455: 433: 432: 405: 404: 403: 361: 360: 359: 358: 348:Colonel Warden 340:editing policy 321: 320: 298: 297: 282: 271: 270: 269: 243: 223: 213:Colonel Warden 191: 190: 127: 123:AfD statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 483: 471: 469: 464: 458: 454: 450: 446: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 428: 426: 421: 419: 413: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 373: 369: 367: 363: 362: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 299: 295: 291: 287: 280: 278: 273: 272: 267: 263: 259: 252: 248: 244: 242: 238: 234: 230: 227: 224: 222: 218: 214: 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 462: 459: 424: 417: 407: 371: 365: 364: 344:Boxing#Rules 301: 275: 246: 233:Clarityfiend 225: 208: 192: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 49: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 408:Strong keep 328:boxing ring 286:Ron Ritzman 157:free images 199:his otters 258:• Gene93k 336:knockout 306:this one 277:Relisted 118:View log 445:Carrite 375:Carrite 163:WP refs 151:scholar 91:protect 86:history 393:Drmies 391:.  ;) 366:Delete 310:Drmies 302:Delete 226:Rename 135:Google 95:delete 425:Hydro 178:JSTOR 139:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 449:talk 418:Code 397:talk 379:talk 352:talk 314:talk 290:talk 262:talk 247:Note 237:talk 217:talk 209:Keep 171:FENS 145:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 334:or 256:-- 185:TWL 120:• 116:– ( 451:) 399:) 381:) 368:- 354:) 330:, 316:) 292:) 264:) 253:. 239:) 219:) 197:, 165:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 447:( 395:( 377:( 350:( 312:( 288:( 260:( 235:( 215:( 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
02:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The distance (boxing)
The distance (boxing)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
his otters
22:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Colonel Warden

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.