262:#1, but the papers all seem to be at least fifty years old and I suspect that GScholar is missing at least some of the older citations. What looks potentially more notable is his teaching activities, and especially the freshman composition course, at Amherst. Courses don't routinely have entire books written about them a generation after they were last taught but this one did - "Fencing with words: a history of writing instruction at Amherst College during the era of Theodore Baird, 1938-1966" by Robin Varnum (it's the book referred to in the NYT obituary linked to in the nomination). I haven't managed to look at
328:. GBooks search turns up a truckload of substantive hits, and GScholar indicates that the book about him (mentioned in the NYTimes obit cited by the nominator) is probably notable itself, and amounts to the substantial coverage required.
159:
52:
to delete. Only one participant in the discussion has characterized their opinion as "Keep" but the sources and arguments presented by the nomination and previous comment do not argue strongly for deletion.
226:
255:,) some degree of notability beyond the house. Looking through the standard GScholar hits (mostly entirely unrelated to him), there is at least one decently-cited paper by him
153:
120:
274:#4. And there's more around, even if most of it is either reviews or citations of Varnum's book, reminiscences of former students or, as in
93:
88:
97:
333:
80:
17:
174:
141:
329:
258:
and several others with a few citations - if one assumes that the citation counts are accurate, not enough to meet
356:
40:
135:
209:
337:
316:
287:
240:
218:
131:
62:
191:
352:
312:
36:
181:
283:
267:
58:
167:
84:
195:
275:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
351:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
308:
297:
147:
279:
252:
54:
271:
259:
76:
68:
232:
263:
114:
300:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
190:
Does not appear to be notable outside of the connection with the LFW house.
256:
345:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
270:, there seems to be at least a plausible case that Baird meets
227:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
194:
is the best I could find, but I don't think it's enough.
110:
106:
102:
166:
307:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
359:). No further edits should be made to this page.
180:
8:
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:
251:To me, Baird seems to have (or have had,
253:which is meant to the same thing here
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
376:
338:02:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
317:00:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
288:14:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
241:17:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
219:21:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
63:08:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
348:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
330:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
266:but on the basis of
48:The result was
319:
268:this review of it
243:
230:
216:
367:
350:
306:
302:
231:
215:
210:
207:
185:
184:
170:
118:
100:
34:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
363:
357:deletion review
346:
295:
264:the book itself
211:
204:
200:
196:
127:
91:
75:
72:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
373:
371:
362:
361:
341:
340:
322:
321:
320:
304:
303:
292:
291:
290:
245:
244:
202:
198:
188:
187:
124:
77:Theodore Baird
71:
69:Theodore Baird
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
372:
360:
358:
354:
349:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
299:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
250:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
214:
208:
206:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
347:
344:
325:
296:
248:
212:
197:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
50:No Consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
309:Ron Ritzman
154:free images
280:PWilkinson
55:Eluchil404
353:talk page
276:this case
233:• Gene93k
37:talk page
355:or in a
298:Relisted
278:, both.
249:Comment:
121:View log
39:or in a
272:WP:PROF
260:WP:PROF
205:anguard
160:WP refs
148:scholar
94:protect
89:history
132:Google
98:delete
175:JSTOR
136:books
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
334:talk
326:Keep
313:talk
284:talk
237:talk
213:Wha?
201:ven
192:This
168:FENS
142:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
59:talk
182:TWL
119:– (
336:)
315:)
286:)
239:)
229:.
162:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
61:)
332:(
311:(
282:(
235:(
203:M
199:S
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
117:)
79:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.