546:, Yes. Themis is a very common name. Mars exploration,+ satelites, + the Themis bands, and mother justice herself all share the name. Themis music which is what the article is about is the name of the Studio and the Band Camp and the Band is called "Themis". Somebody referred to 'the Google test' ('doesn't do well on the google test') (?) Google "Themis" and "Themis music" and you will see incredibly different results. The point is that I think Brian used the name for the article correctly as it describes Themis music the Band Camp, the studio and the concept of wicca music. I disagree with the statement "quality of the article is terrible" and wonder why there is so much derisive commentary in this thread without any form of constructive help or assistance. I guess you must keep outsiders out.
293:. When discussing whether to delete or merge an article due to non-notability, the discussion should focus not only on whether notability is established in the article, but on what the probability is that notability could be established. If it is likely that independent sources could be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate" More to the point, the article is notable if it were true. It appears verified true. The fact that in a small country like Canada (Population of New York City) you have the emergence of a new music Genre involving an ecology-based religion is of itself
771:) listed and its an interview; the CBC has a section where the band was on the air. The CBC links are slow (java?). The Wicca theme is talked about in one way or another every linked article even the 3rd prty schedule show listings. But wait. The fuss about wiccan rock and Themis is that they are starting a new genre. That's the notable thing, right? I have seen this fuss with a new wine! (gave myself away :) I must get on with my day. name is Joe BTW. and thanks.
31:
341:
I think notability is established. I found this review (www.e-music.ca/focus1-themis.htm) to be quite useful. Basically it says that Themis has invented a new music classification. I am sure the competing music genres will be upset (there are soooo many) but if you look at the uniqueness its nothing
567:
okay in an attempt to help may I suggest that the article be rewritten to better reflect what it is about. Perhaps, by sectioning it and discussing each aspect in a different section. Also perhaps reviewing the help pages on article creation and particularly on "your first article" could help solve
749:
Unfortunately, I can't access 1, 2, or 8. I've already commented above that the review may not constitute a reliable 3rd party source in accordance with the projects guidelines and policies. Please understand that proving the existence (or even popularity) of the band isn't the same as notability.
449:
can't seem to establish their notability in accordance with policy and guidelines. Lacking in reliable 3rd party references for verifiability. Not sure the review mentioned above is from a reliable 3rd party source either. This article should be deleted and appropriate articles created about the
161:
Nominating as non-notable self-promotion. References are either band-related websites or directory sites, with the possible exception of the CBC Radio 3 site (although the band admits this site seems to have an open-door policy towards bands, meaning inclusion isn't an indication of notability).
582:
I think if the article is kept then the most important improvement that could be made would be to put in some more substantial content about what the band has actually done/achieved to date and trim the huge amounts of unencyclopedic rambling about their beliefs/creed/lyrical content..... --
987:
As such, I feel that it doesn't meet the first criteria of WP:MUSIC, which is - "subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable." A gig listing is trivial, and two online reviews don't meet the criteria of multiple
597:
I'd also seriously question the claim of the band to have invented a whole new genre of music. One band choosing to sing about a particular subject does not suddenly create a whole new genre of music. Plus, although my knowledge of wicca is minimal to say the least, haven't bands like
388:* Ok. I have asked a number of other people to assit with discography and references. The problem is that I and most people are WIki illiterate and just learning. PLease give me enough time to make the changes needed. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers. -Brian
288:
The article is notable within substantial portion of the population. The article refers to a very narrow genre of religious music that has few practitioners. Many people who are Wicca's probably don't want to say that. The rules of
Knowledge (XXG) say that
489:
No particular opinion on notability as yet, but it has to be said the quality of the article is terrible, even down to the title - if the band is called Themis (as is the case.....I think) then why is the article entitled "Themis music"...........? --
810:
957:- fails WP:MUSIC. Note criteria 7, which states "Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style". Creating a new "genre" of music is not notable in itself, and needs verifiable
506:
My guess on that is because articles entitled Themis already exist about other subjects and AGF the creator is new. Plus perhaps some confusion between the band and the "genre" they created.
701:
can you let me know which 4 articles you think are from reliable 3rd party sources which cover the subject of the article in a non-trival way are. I will happily look again at them.
154:
842:
424:
It is worth noting that there may be a link between mobrien.com and webradio.ca. If
Mobrien9279 is linked to mobrien.com (and/or to Themis) there could be a potential
40:
226:* It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable. At least three sources
476:
718:
reference links 1, 2, 3, and 8 look good to me. the others are valid to support the various elements but after searching on yahoo I found better notability than
297:. There are a lot of us Wicca around the world. Here in Sweden there are more than a few. Some are outspoken like me. Stop this professional snobbery and
162:
While not a primary indicator in and of itself, there are only about 25 Google hits when searching for 'Themis "Wicca rock'" and 'Themis "Wiccan rock'".
785:
As stated above, I would dispute that one band choosing to sing about a particular subject suddenly causes a "new genre of music" to be invented --
554:
664:
some of the links are just listings but four or more articles seem to be from third party sources. It's a close call but I say notable and 'keep'
211:
886:
876:
772:
732:
682:
668:
656:
Interesting isn't a policy or guideline and therefore not really a valid reason to keep. If it were my "vote" would have been different.
627:
894:
690:
375:
330:
195:...been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
550:
371:
349:
17:
1067:
475:
notability doesn't appear to be established, there is a lack of reliable 3rd party sources, and doesn't do well on the google test
928:
322:
308:
121:
116:
125:
178:
1016:
906:
642:
108:
1049:
65:
46:
1025:
Question. Is this delete or a keep. This article seems like it have enough source, but the article is not too clear.--
924:
291:
it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be
174:
1048:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1012:
902:
638:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
890:
880:
776:
736:
686:
672:
631:
534:
728:
345:
304:
249:
790:
607:
588:
495:
415:
367:
353:
198:
1031:
1020:
997:
949:
932:
910:
863:
831:
794:
780:
759:
740:
710:
676:
646:
611:
592:
577:
558:
538:
515:
499:
484:
467:
437:
419:
405:
401:
393:
357:
316:
278:
253:
243:
216:
184:
90:
363:
112:
860:
828:
755:
706:
573:
511:
463:
326:
312:
945:
479:
455:
719:
104:
96:
993:
530:
433:
170:
1008:
526:
451:
263:
78:
976:
myspace.com - Themis' official myspace, which I don't believe is a RS for the sourced statement
875:
I think the edits made already fix the article sufficiently. It should survive. It is notable.
767:
oh dear. well maybe the connection will open up later. the article at Web Radio has a contact (
786:
603:
584:
491:
411:
203:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
626:
no particular opinion on notability either. it seems fine. I found the article interesting.
599:
397:
389:
239:
988:
non-trivial published works (especially when we consider the reliablily of the sources). -
425:
1026:
849:
817:
751:
702:
569:
507:
459:
86:
958:
941:
602:
been making rock music with wiccan themes (i.e. "wiccan rock") for many years.....? --
268:
1061:
989:
429:
165:
142:
342:
to worry about, just something new but harmless. Themis should be kept alive.
82:
266:. The references provided by Mobrien show verifiability but not notability.
81:
are compelling, and the references given to refute that are much less so.
235:
923:. i will look again tomorrow and see what edits might help. sugestions?
197:
As the nom, it has been mentioned on CBC but I there is that policy....
227:
231:
982:
livewithculture.ca - a gig listing for a local show at the Rivoli
1042:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
768:
25:
970:
Webradio.ca - no indication that this is a reliable source
811:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
149:
138:
134:
130:
1007:- clear self-promotion, and doesn't pass any part of
529:; sources cited above are nowhere near good enough.
724:above rewrite suggestion might be a good approach
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1052:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:, article fails to establish notability as per
967:A summary of the current references follows:
8:
843:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
961:that states that this genre is notable.
901:Clearly the same as 66.163.29.30 above.
841:: This debate has been included in the
809:: This debate has been included in the
637:Clearly the same as 66.163.29.30 above.
238:verify the article fully and reliably.
45:For an explanation of the process, see
973:E-music.ca - a review of a local show
410:Please don't !vote more than once --
228:E-Music Download Review: Themis Music
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
979:Themismusic.com - official website
41:deletion review on 2009 October 24
24:
1011:with multiple reliable sources.
568:some of the "content" problems.
77:. The arguments that this fails
29:
458:when they both become notable.
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
769:http://webradio1.net/melanie/
551:Portrait of the Dead Countess
193:per the fact that it has not
883:) 22:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
634:) 12:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
1084:
525:, utterly non-notable per
1032:23:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
1021:23:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
998:00:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
950:13:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
933:23:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
921:the recent edits are good
911:23:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
864:17:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
832:17:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
795:14:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
781:14:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
760:14:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
741:13:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
711:13:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
677:12:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
647:23:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
612:14:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
593:14:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
578:13:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
559:12:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
539:11:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
516:11:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
500:11:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
485:10:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
468:09:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
438:00:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
420:11:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
406:03:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
358:03:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
317:02:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
279:02:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
254:02:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
217:01:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
185:23:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
91:01:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
1068:Pages at deletion review
1045:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
925:Nymphetamine labyrinth
236:WebRadio Canada Review
895:few or no other edits
691:few or no other edits
376:few or no other edits
331:few or no other edits
897:outside this topic.
693:outside this topic.
426:conflict of interest
378:outside this topic.
333:outside this topic.
1013:Wheelchair Epidemic
903:Wheelchair Epidemic
639:Wheelchair Epidemic
899:
635:
913:
898:
870:
866:
846:
834:
814:
743:
731:comment added by
694:
649:
621:
379:
360:
348:comment added by
334:
319:
307:comment added by
277:
256:
232:CBC Radio3 Review
182:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
1075:
1047:
1029:
959:reliable sources
900:
884:
857:
854:
847:
837:
825:
822:
815:
805:
726:
680:
636:
600:Inkubus Sukkubus
361:
343:
320:
302:
275:
274:
267:
247:
214:
209:
206:
201:
183:
168:
152:
146:
128:
73:The result was
63:
33:
32:
26:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1050:deletion review
1043:
1027:
940:nn self-promo.
855:
850:
823:
818:
272:Esradekan Gibb
270:
269:
212:
207:
204:
199:
163:
148:
119:
103:
100:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1081:
1079:
1071:
1070:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1037:
1035:
1034:
1023:
1002:
1001:
1000:
985:
984:
983:
980:
977:
974:
971:
952:
935:
868:
867:
835:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
762:
713:
666:
665:
658:
657:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
548:
547:
541:
519:
518:
503:
502:
487:
481:Deadly∀ssassin
470:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
336:
335:
282:
281:
257:
220:
219:
159:
158:
99:
94:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1080:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1053:
1051:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1033:
1030:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
986:
981:
978:
975:
972:
969:
968:
966:
963:
962:
960:
956:
953:
951:
947:
943:
939:
936:
934:
930:
926:
922:
919:
916:
915:
914:
912:
908:
904:
896:
892:
888:
887:66.163.18.204
882:
878:
877:66.163.18.204
874:
865:
862:
858:
853:
844:
840:
836:
833:
830:
826:
821:
812:
808:
804:
803:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
782:
778:
774:
773:192.139.80.22
770:
766:
763:
761:
757:
753:
748:
745:
744:
742:
738:
734:
733:192.139.80.22
730:
725:
721:
717:
714:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
696:
695:
692:
688:
684:
683:192.139.80.22
678:
674:
670:
669:192.139.80.22
663:
660:
659:
655:
652:
651:
650:
648:
644:
640:
633:
629:
628:66.163.18.194
625:
613:
609:
605:
601:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
566:
563:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
545:
542:
540:
536:
532:
531:Blackmetalbaz
528:
524:
521:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
488:
486:
483:
482:
477:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:Themis (band)
454:and the band
453:
448:
445:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
359:
355:
351:
347:
340:
332:
328:
324:
318:
314:
310:
306:
300:
296:
292:
287:
284:
283:
280:
276:
273:
265:
261:
258:
255:
252:was added at
251:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
221:
218:
215:
210:
202:
196:
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
180:
176:
172:
167:
156:
151:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
98:
95:
93:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1044:
1041:
1036:
1004:
964:
954:
937:
920:
917:
872:
869:
851:
838:
819:
806:
787:ChrisTheDude
764:
746:
723:
720:Themis music
715:
698:
679:Fred Harris
667:
661:
653:
623:
620:
604:ChrisTheDude
585:ChrisTheDude
564:
549:
543:
522:
492:ChrisTheDude
480:
472:
446:
412:ChrisTheDude
384:
383:
364:66.163.29.30
350:66.163.29.30
338:
337:
298:
294:
290:
285:
271:
259:
223:
194:
190:
160:
105:Themis music
97:Themis music
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
893:) has made
727:—Preceding
689:) has made
398:Mobrien9279
390:Mobrien9279
374:) has made
344:—Preceding
329:) has made
303:—Preceding
248:—Preceding
240:Mobrien9279
1028:Freewayguy
752:Jasynnash2
703:Jasynnash2
570:Jasynnash2
508:Jasynnash2
460:Jasynnash2
452:Wicca Rock
323:88.80.5.80
309:88.80.5.80
213:REVIEW ME
1062:Category
1009:WP:MUSIC
990:DigitalC
965:Comment:
729:unsigned
699:question
527:WP:MUSIC
430:DigitalC
372:contribs
346:unsigned
305:unsigned
264:WP:MUSIC
166:Huntster
155:View log
79:WP:MUSIC
654:Comment
565:Comment
295:notable
250:comment
122:protect
117:history
1005:Delete
955:Delete
938:Delete
852:Double
820:Double
722:uses.
716:answer
523:Delete
473:Delete
450:genre
447:Delete
260:Delete
200:TALKIN
191:Delete
150:delete
126:delete
75:Delete
861:Talk)
829:Talk)
765:reply
747:reply
208:EATER
153:) – (
143:views
135:watch
131:links
83:Kevin
16:<
1017:talk
994:talk
946:talk
942:Libs
929:talk
918:Keep
907:talk
891:talk
881:talk
873:keep
856:Blue
839:Note
824:Blue
807:Note
791:talk
777:talk
756:talk
737:talk
707:talk
687:talk
673:talk
662:keep
643:talk
632:talk
624:keep
608:talk
589:talk
574:talk
555:talk
544:Keep
535:talk
512:talk
496:talk
478:. --
464:talk
434:talk
428:. -
416:talk
402:talk
394:talk
385:Keep
368:talk
354:talk
339:Keep
327:talk
313:talk
299:keep
286:Keep
244:talk
234:and
224:Keep
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
87:talk
848:--
845:.
816:--
813:.
301:.
246:)
205:PIE
1064::
1019:)
996:)
948:)
931:)
909:)
885:—
871:*
793:)
779:)
758:)
739:)
709:)
681:—
675:)
645:)
622:*
610:)
591:)
576:)
557:)
537:)
514:)
498:)
466:)
436:)
418:)
404:)
396:)
370:•
362:—
356:)
321:—
315:)
230:,
177:•
173:•
164:—
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
89:)
43:.
1015:(
992:(
944:(
927:(
905:(
889:(
879:(
859:(
827:(
789:(
775:(
754:(
735:(
705:(
685:(
671:(
641:(
630:(
606:(
587:(
572:(
553:(
533:(
510:(
494:(
462:(
432:(
414:(
400:(
392:(
366:(
352:(
325:(
311:(
289:"
242:(
181:)
179:c
175:@
171:t
169:(
157:)
147:(
145:)
107:(
85:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.