537:
count if it's from another
Knowledge page, but that is not so. Attribution is normally in the editing history, but that is lost if you copy and paste. In this case, almost everything is from one person, but not all. Really, it would be better to either (1) edit the existing article (2) wait until the AfD is over or (3) write a new article from scratch, so that it doesn't include anyone else's edits. Also, I think it is only fair to warn you that, before putting a significant amount of work into the new article, you should decide whether the subject really does meet Knowledge's
324:
Before nominating this one for deletion, I had a look at some of those individual-animal articles and, frankly, they all looked quite more notable than this one. Not hugely perhaps (like the two about rabbits on websites collecting money for not eating them), but they looked like having received more
536:
The trouble with that suggestion is that you will have to be careful about including any other editor's contribution without attribution. Using other people's contribution without attribution is copyright infringement. A surprising number of people think that somehow copyright infringement doesn't
253:
The bit added to
Keinohrhasen seems fine to me and completely sufficient to cover this nonevent. An article on earless rabbits in general would also be fine and this animal could be a footnote in such an article, too. Whether there is enough material for an article on "German celebrity animals" I
612:"The trouble with that suggestion is that you will have to be careful about including any other editor's contribution without attribution." Maybe so, but it happens all the time beyond the notice of almost everyone. AfD shouldn't delay people's desire to create, if they wish to do so.--
305:
article (which can include mentions of notable earless rabbits), assuming we can source it well. I wouldn't go with German celebrity animals, because I see news stories out there about earless rabbits from other countries
296:
There are some individual animal articles out there which do survive AfD, but honestly they aren't that useful unless you are trying to remember a particular incident. One such article was morphed into the much-celebrated
164:
195:
There was a rabbit without any ears. A cameraman stepped on it and the poor animal died. It will now be stuffed and exhibited. Sources confirm this happened. PRODded with reason "Not notable. Just a minor
486:
I have reverted the move. An article under discussion at AfD should not be blanked or removed. The proper procedure is to wait until the AfD closes and then, if appropriate, to userfy the article.
158:
125:
361:
422:
If you want to work on an article without worrying about anyone else's interference you can always start it off on a user subpage. For example, you could work on
52:. Consensus is to delete. As the creator has expressed a desire to have the page userified, I have done so; redirecting the original location and/or creating
298:
340:
98:
93:
473:
423:
179:
102:
17:
146:
85:
140:
731:
541:
requirements. It would be a pity to put in a lot of work, only to see both articles deleted one after the other.
40:
61:
232:
136:
680:
330:
259:
213:
546:
491:
727:
712:
685:
667:
663:
621:
566:
562:
550:
531:
513:
509:
495:
477:
451:
447:
433:
413:
409:
395:
375:
352:
348:
334:
326:
315:
285:
281:
263:
255:
244:
240:
217:
209:
186:
67:
36:
89:
401:
302:
228:
53:
469:
172:
57:
461:
81:
73:
464:
for deletion. This will not prevent you moving the article back into mainspace when you choose. –
197:
542:
487:
391:
371:
273:
201:
152:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
726:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
460:
Note that because we can't redirect from mainspace into userspace, I'm going to have to mark
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
659:
648:
558:
505:
443:
430:
405:
344:
277:
236:
426:
until you felt it was of a high enough quality to be moved into the main encyclopedia.--
694:
538:
465:
614:
524:
308:
387:
367:
224:
119:
427:
651:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
200:". DePRODded without explanation. However, PROD reason still stands, and
301:, which is well sourced and a good compilation. I love the idea of an
693:
agreed. Might be worth a line in some rabbit-related article though.
720:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
272:
I will work on it. Basically all the Til sources talked about
223:
I was warned that this might happen. A bit was added to
115:
111:
107:
171:
557:
I will just wait since you won't let me do any work.
658:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
522:
Just copy and paste into a new userspace article.--
254:don't know, but if there are sources, go ahead! --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
734:). No further edits should be made to this page.
362:list of Organisms-related deletion discussions
276:and how celebrity animals are big in Germany.
185:
8:
679:, non-notable bunny/event. Slow news day. --
360:Note: This debate has been included in the
325:sustained coverage than is the case here. --
359:
339:There was 1 in Japan and 3 in China after
299:List of animals with fraudulent diplomas
56:can be done through the usual channels.
386:per nom; celebrity is not notability.
7:
504:How am I supposed to work in peace?
341:Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
24:
404:? I don't want to get yelled at.
424:User:CallawayRox/Earless rabbit
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
751:
713:00:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
686:17:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
668:00:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
567:16:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
551:15:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
532:17:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
514:16:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
496:12:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
478:01:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
452:18:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
434:20:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
414:16:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
396:17:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
376:16:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
353:17:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
335:22:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
316:20:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
286:19:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
264:18:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
245:18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
218:18:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
622:03:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
68:05:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
723:Please do not modify it.
442:I userfied the article.
233:German celebrity animals
32:Please do not modify it.
202:WP is not a newspaper
682:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
48:The result was
670:
620:
530:
378:
365:
314:
274:Knut (polar bear)
742:
725:
710:
707:
704:
701:
683:
657:
653:
619:
529:
366:
313:
190:
189:
175:
123:
105:
64:
34:
750:
749:
745:
744:
743:
741:
740:
739:
738:
732:deletion review
721:
708:
705:
702:
699:
681:
646:
132:
96:
80:
77:
66:
62:
50:Delete/Userify.
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
748:
746:
737:
736:
716:
715:
695:Andrew Lenahan
688:
673:
672:
671:
655:
654:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
517:
516:
499:
498:
481:
480:
455:
454:
437:
436:
417:
416:
402:Earless rabbit
400:Can I work on
398:
380:
379:
357:
356:
355:
337:
319:
318:
303:earless rabbit
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
267:
266:
248:
247:
229:Earless rabbit
193:
192:
129:
76:
71:
60:
58:The Bushranger
54:Earless rabbit
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
747:
735:
733:
729:
724:
718:
717:
714:
711:
696:
692:
689:
687:
684:
678:
675:
674:
669:
665:
661:
656:
652:
650:
645:
623:
617:
616:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
534:
533:
527:
526:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
435:
432:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
363:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
336:
332:
328:
327:Guillaume2303
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
311:
310:
304:
300:
295:
294:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
256:Guillaume2303
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
210:Guillaume2303
207:
203:
199:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
65:
63:One ping only
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
722:
719:
698:
690:
676:
647:
613:
543:JamesBWatson
523:
488:JamesBWatson
462:Til (rabbit)
431:(let's chat)
383:
307:
225:Keinohrhasen
205:
198:single event
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
82:Til (rabbit)
74:Til (rabbit)
49:
47:
31:
28:
660:Ron Ritzman
559:CallawayRox
506:CallawayRox
444:CallawayRox
406:CallawayRox
345:CallawayRox
278:CallawayRox
237:CallawayRox
159:free images
539:notability
728:talk page
466:Roscelese
368:• Gene93k
204:. Hence:
37:talk page
730:or in a
649:Relisted
615:Milowent
525:Milowent
474:contribs
309:Milowent
227:. Would
126:View log
39:or in a
388:Bearian
235:be ok?
165:WP refs
153:scholar
99:protect
94:history
691:Delete
677:Delete
428:Yaksar
384:Delete
306:too.--
206:delete
137:Google
103:delete
180:JSTOR
141:books
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
664:talk
563:talk
547:talk
510:talk
492:talk
470:talk
448:talk
410:talk
392:talk
372:talk
349:talk
331:talk
282:talk
260:talk
241:talk
214:talk
173:FENS
147:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
706:bli
231:or
187:TWL
124:– (
709:nd
703:ar
700:St
697:-
666:)
618:•
565:)
549:)
528:•
512:)
494:)
476:)
472:⋅
450:)
412:)
394:)
374:)
364:.
351:)
343:.
333:)
312:•
284:)
262:)
243:)
216:)
208:.
167:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
662:(
561:(
545:(
508:(
490:(
468:(
446:(
408:(
390:(
370:(
347:(
329:(
280:(
258:(
239:(
212:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.