432:
a giant source of information. He has also worked with notable academics in the field. This is my first
Knowledge entry, so I appreciate all the comments that people have left, both positive and negative, as they are helping me learn and grow as an editor. If anyone can tell me with a solution with the sources problem, be it contact said academics and get them to post about Wallace-Murphy or anything like that, I can try and get in contact to make this possible. In the meantime, I will continue to look for credible sources to reference to and hope to overcome any issues regarding this article.
398:, don't we?) But in this instance we have no sources which discuss Wallace-Murphy as a topic himself, and the handful of reviews we have of his work are insufficient to impute notability arising from the impact/coverage of those works. The thing is, if there's some truth to the (clearly promotional) bio, there may be sourcing out there, so I tend to agree with TG that this is a borderline case. Still, on the basis of what I've seen so far, and what I've found myself, I have to come down on the side of delete unless superior sourcing is located.
431:
linked above, you can see that all the clients of DMA Europa are industrial companies, working in water treatment plants, car manufacturing ect. We have never done any PR work for
Authors or Media. In regards to the sources, he has appeared on BBC news programs but this predates the internet becoming
293:
I found some trades reviews and one from a media outlet, but I'm just kind of unsure that these are enough, given that trade reviews tend to be a weaker source than a fuller review. They're still technically usable, but just barely. If it is decided that it's enough, the article will need to be
273:. Of course neither of these are things that would help him pass notability criteria for academics, which is difficult for most to pass but especially for anyone that's even remotely fringe. I'll check some of the academic databases to see what I can find.
394:. At least, assuming no better sources are turned up than those currently sourcing the article or which TG turned up. Being an author of fringe notions does not in itself disqualify a person from being notable in-and-of-themselves (we have an article on
168:
427:: I can assure you that this is personal work, and I am not being commissioned for it in anyway. I do work for DMA Europa, but I am a website developer. If you also look at the link to the site that User
121:
162:
231:- PR-cruft. Non-notable author. The majority of books are self-published, others were published by a firm that specialized in conspiracy theories. No reliable sources.
270:
128:
94:
89:
98:
81:
199:
Promotional piece about a non-notable, largely self-published author of
Knights Templar pseudo-documentaries. Article was created by
183:
218:
150:
17:
204:
265:: I'm finding some evidence to show that he is at least somewhat well thought of in his field, as he was interviewed
144:
487:
449:, not for being fringe, but for not passing our guidelines for authors or academics. Also, likely promotional.
437:
40:
468:
441:
419:
386:
354:
338:
305:
284:
257:
240:
222:
63:
253:
140:
85:
236:
266:
190:
61:
249:
483:
298:
277:
77:
69:
36:
433:
377:
200:
417:
331:
176:
351:
232:
156:
364:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
482:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
295:
274:
368:
450:
428:
399:
395:
326:
212:
347:
115:
207:) was uploaded to Commons by as user who identified themselves as ]
476:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
317:
Non-notable fringe writer who promulgates nonsense. Neither the
208:
325:
are reliable sources. Both are disinformation operations.
346:, pure promotion, non-notable by Knowledge's criteria.
111:
107:
103:
175:
294:
substantially edited to remove the uncited details.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
490:). No further edits should be made to this page.
189:
8:
267:in the History Channel's The Templar Code
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
469:02:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
442:10:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
420:08:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
387:23:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
355:15:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
339:04:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
306:10:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
285:04:35, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
258:01:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
241:23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
223:22:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
64:02:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
205:File:Tim Wallace-Murphy.jpg
507:
479:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
363:Subject does not meet
211:is a marketing firm.
248:- Per nomination.
78:Tim Wallace-Murphy
70:Tim Wallace-Murphy
203:, and the image (
498:
481:
466:
463:
460:
457:
413:
410:
407:
404:
382:
373:
336:
334:Let's discuss it
302:
281:
215:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
57:
34:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
497:
496:
495:
494:
488:deletion review
477:
464:
461:
458:
455:
434:Jordan.williams
411:
408:
405:
402:
380:
371:
332:
319:History Channel
300:
279:
221:
213:
201:Jordan.williams
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
504:
502:
493:
492:
472:
471:
451:Andrew Lenahan
444:
422:
396:L. Ron Hubbard
389:
358:
341:
311:
310:
309:
308:
288:
287:
260:
250:Sportsfan 1234
243:
217:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
503:
491:
489:
485:
480:
474:
473:
470:
467:
452:
448:
445:
443:
439:
435:
430:
426:
423:
421:
418:
416:
415:
414:
397:
393:
390:
388:
385:
384:
383:
376:
375:
374:
366:
362:
359:
356:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
330:
329:
324:
320:
316:
313:
312:
307:
304:
303:
297:
292:
291:
290:
289:
286:
283:
282:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
233:Beyond My Ken
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
478:
475:
454:
446:
424:
401:
400:
391:
379:
378:
370:
369:
360:
343:
333:
327:
322:
318:
314:
299:
278:
262:
245:
228:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
296:Tokyogirl79
275:Tokyogirl79
269:and quoted
163:free images
365:WP:NAUTHOR
323:Daily Star
209:DMA Europa
484:talk page
429:WikiDan61
214:WikiDan61
37:talk page
486:or in a
348:Bishonen
321:nor the
219:ReadMe!!
122:View log
39:or in a
425:Comment
301:(｡◕‿◕｡)
280:(｡◕‿◕｡)
263:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
447:Delete
392:Delete
381:apolis
361:Delete
344:Delete
328:Cullen
315:Delete
246:Delete
229:Delete
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
52:. –
16:<
438:talk
372:Mini
352:talk
271:here
254:talk
237:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
462:bli
191:TWL
120:– (
465:nd
459:ar
456:St
453:-
440:)
367:.
350:|
256:)
239:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:|
436:(
412:w
409:o
406:n
403:S
357:.
252:(
235:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.