168:. Hang on, this is not for speedy deletion. I reads like sound science and it has references. How do you know it is a college paper? That, on its own, is not a reason for deletion. Is it notable? I suggest asking some of the science projects for input. Maybe it overlaps with other articles and should be merged. Maybe it should be kept. It should not be deleted without further attention. --
188:
reveals 52 mentions in scholarly sources so the topic is more than a "college paper", and from following one of the links the origins of it seem to go back to 1986 (shame the article's refs don't but early days). It seems to be mainly a current interest of very few research groups though and I
116:
83:
78:
87:
70:
186:
197:
but there's already enough here that merging it there would unbalance the coverage of that article and this is at a much higher technical level.
214:. Seems to be a notable technique, with multiple mentions in journals and books. The article just needs some cleanup and wikification. --
74:
17:
240:
223:
206:
177:
160:
132:
52:
66:
58:
255:
36:
254:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
123:
Yet another instance of someone uploading their college paper onto
Knowledge (XXG). Prod removed by author.
147:
I missed the refs first time around. Serves me right for procrastinating papers by using wikipedia.
194:
154:
232:
193:
is of concern, but that alone is not a reason to delete when it's only 3 days old. Related to
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
190:
236:
128:
173:
148:
231:. Article could be cleaned up, but it definitely serves a purpose and should be kept.
219:
202:
49:
104:
124:
169:
215:
198:
248:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
189:
suspect the authors of this article belong to one of them so
111:
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
258:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
195:Thermal conductivity#Measurement
1:
241:16:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
224:10:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
207:01:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
185:. A small amount of googling
178:00:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
161:22:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
133:22:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
67:Time-Domain Thermoreflectance
59:Time-Domain Thermoreflectance
275:
53:00:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
251:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
266:
253:
151:
114:
108:
90:
34:
274:
273:
269:
268:
267:
265:
264:
263:
262:
256:deletion review
249:
157:
149:
110:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
272:
270:
261:
260:
244:
243:
226:
209:
180:
163:
155:
121:
120:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
271:
259:
257:
252:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
187:
184:
181:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
162:
159:
158:
152:
146:
143:
141:
140:Speedy delete
137:
136:
135:
134:
130:
126:
118:
113:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
250:
247:
228:
211:
182:
165:
153:
144:
139:
138:
122:
45:
43:
31:
28:
150:RogueNinja
142:per nom.
117:View log
191:WP:NPOV
166:Comment
84:protect
79:history
50:John254
233:Jgebis
125:JuJube
112:delete
88:delete
170:Bduke
115:) – (
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
237:talk
229:Keep
220:talk
216:Itub
212:Keep
203:talk
199:Qwfp
183:Keep
174:talk
156:talk
145:Keep
129:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
239:)
222:)
205:)
176:)
131:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
235:(
218:(
201:(
172:(
127:(
119:)
109:(
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.