380:
concerned about quality issues and that nothing has been done to update the article, perhaps they could update the article! Feel free to create a new "Traktor (filmmaking collective)" or similar article too. They also certainly meet notability requirements, and there are still existing incoming links, for example in
478:
If there's a consensus that the subject is indeed notable, reliable sources are easily found, and the article could be improved by editing - if only someone would make the effort - then it shouldn't be removed from the main article space, no matter how "terrible" it is currently, or how long it's
379:
I see no grounds for deletion. Notability is easily established; there are several full-length books on the subject, many substantial articles in major music magazines, and the software is used by numerous notable musicians. The article has many incoming
Knowledge (XXG) links. If the nominator is
384:. You can easily do better starting from scratch than the original stub article, which may be largely a copyright violation taken from the IMDb bio anyway (hard to say which came first). I don't see a need to rename the current article, the existing disambiguation link is sufficient.
237:
also overwrote the original
Traktor article, the production which was responsible for the 'Where's Your Head At' song, which may have been notable. As software goes I don't think it is notable. Also editor
190:
89:
143:
252:
299:
272:
542:
I agree with @IamNotU, i.e it should be stubbed, and perhaps add an entry made into requested articles, to get it updated. I'm not planning to do any work on it.
184:
150:
479:
been that way. Except for extreme cases of spam or copyright infringement, if the existing content is hopelessly irredeemable, then at most it should be
84:
233:. Article has OR, Advert, Inline citation and lack of sources tags, since 2011, but nothing has been done to update the article. The author
17:
484:
483:. But that's a content discussion for the article's talk page, not AfD. "Needs improvement" isn't grounds for deletion. There's
301:. We decide notability based on whether sources exist, not whether they've been properly cited in the article. They exist.
453:
354:
551:
534:
513:
496:
468:
442:
419:
393:
369:
345:
310:
284:
264:
244:
68:
570:
40:
205:
116:
111:
172:
120:
327:
509:
414:
103:
530:
166:
566:
547:
464:
438:
381:
365:
319:
280:
260:
234:
36:
433:
340:
504:
Fairly notable software for the DJ world, if not THE software for the DJ world. Pretty obvious keep.
480:
162:
505:
402:
401:
for now only if it can be improved but if not, and someone would rather take time for that, Draft.
198:
488:
385:
230:
322:
without keeping a redirect to unhide the original (2005) deletion, the name is ambiguous, e.g.,
296:
212:
526:
492:
389:
306:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
565:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
543:
276:
256:
241:
226:
222:
337:
61:
429:
178:
302:
107:
432:
is not based upon whether or not articles are improved. For more information, see
137:
487:, and one shouldn't be artificially imposed through an AfD nomination. --
323:
99:
74:
559:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
456:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
357:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
330:(various topics incl. sports), etc. Then let's discuss or
229:. It is really a terrible article, about DJ software and
133:
129:
125:
525:
leading DJ software, and that's a significant market.
197:
462:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
363:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
211:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:). No further edits should be made to this page.
295:Searches quickly turned up a review on Engadget
253:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
90:Articles for deletion/Traktor (2nd nomination)
273:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:
250:
82:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
81:
240:] almost seems to be single use.
24:
328:w:de:Traktor (Begriffsklärung)
221:Article which fails to assert
1:
298:and a book about the product
85:Articles for deletion/Traktor
521:per DeathLibrarian. This is
485:no deadline for improvement
590:
535:17:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
514:07:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
497:18:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
469:12:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
443:12:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
420:05:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
394:01:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
370:00:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
346:04:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
311:01:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
285:00:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
265:00:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
245:23:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
562:Please do not modify it.
552:11:58, 04 May 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
69:02:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
80:AfDs for this article:
382:Chain of Fools (film)
334:the renamed page. –
55:(non-admin closure)
320:Traktor (software)
231:Native Instruments
471:
372:
343:
287:
267:
57:
581:
564:
467:
461:
459:
457:
441:
417:
412:
368:
362:
360:
358:
336:
216:
215:
201:
153:
141:
123:
67:
66:
64:
53:
34:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
577:
571:deletion review
560:
472:
463:
452:
450:
437:
415:
403:
373:
364:
353:
351:
344:
158:
149:
114:
98:
95:
78:
62:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
576:
575:
555:
554:
537:
516:
506:Deathlibrarian
499:
460:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
423:
422:
396:
361:
350:
349:
348:
335:
313:
289:
288:
268:
219:
218:
155:
94:
93:
92:
87:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
574:
572:
568:
563:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
474:
473:
470:
466:
465:North America
458:
455:
444:
440:
439:North America
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
418:
413:
410:
406:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
375:
374:
371:
367:
366:North America
359:
356:
347:
342:
339:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
236:
235:92.225.80.126
232:
228:
224:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
88:
86:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
561:
558:
539:
527:Andy Dingley
522:
518:
501:
475:
451:
408:
404:
398:
376:
352:
331:
324:w:de:Traktor
315:
292:
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
146:
49:
47:
31:
28:
544:scope_creep
434:WP:NOEFFORT
277:GabeIglesia
257:GabeIglesia
242:scope_creep
185:free images
430:notability
338:Be..anyone
567:talk page
63:Music1201
37:talk page
569:or in a
476:Comment:
454:Relisted
355:Relisted
144:View log
39:or in a
540:Comment
489:IamNotU
481:stubbed
386:IamNotU
303:Msnicki
191:WPÂ refs
179:scholar
117:protect
112:history
100:Traktor
75:Traktor
428:Topic
411:wister
407:wister
332:delete
326:, DAB
316:Rename
227:WP:ORG
223:WP:GNG
163:Google
121:delete
377:Keep.
293:Keep.
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
548:talk
531:talk
519:Keep
510:talk
502:Keep
493:talk
416:talk
399:Keep
390:talk
307:talk
281:talk
261:talk
225:and
199:FENS
173:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
50:keep
523:the
318:to
213:TWL
142:– (
52:.
550:)
533:)
512:)
495:)
436:.
392:)
341:đź’©
309:)
283:)
275:.
263:)
255:.
193:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
59:—
546:(
529:(
508:(
491:(
409:T
405:S
388:(
305:(
279:(
259:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
147:·
140:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.