379:. Apparently not notable at all. Appearances in half a dozen research papers are not sufficient for a separate article, and there are no organisational reasons to keep this a separate article. The topic can be much better understood if treated in its proper context. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary.
326:
journal articles would be considered primary sources and other secondary, depending on content. Those that introduce the trigintaduonions or demonstrate new results concerning them would be primary sources. Those that rely on their reading public to be familiary with the trigintaduonions already or
307:
specifies that secondary sources should be used as evidence for notability. Journal article are considered primary sources. So appearance in the literature must include books or survey articles to be acceptable for this purpose. In any case, the references given don't seem to indicate whether they
191:
This is an example of the Cayley–Dickson construction applied multiple times. In theory, the construction could be applied an infinite number of times, but the resulting objects are only mathematically significant in the first few cases. We don't need an article on a mathematical concept simply
354:
without linking to that article, so here it is. I don't know how far down the sequence you can go and find objects worthy of an article. We have articles on particular four-digit integers that stand out as notable; maybe the same could be said of the 4379th object in this sequence. But some
231:
I have expanded the article somewhat and added reference. Since this algebra has a specific and recognised name, it does merit its own article. The point about technicality and accessibility is a recurring complaint about
Knowledge mathematics articles, but is not grounds for deletion.
273:. While somewhat obscure, these do seem to appear in the literature. Regarding Mblumber's point about being technical: It's not at the moment much worse than many other math stubs. For a mathematician or math student I think it is acceptable. In the long run it will be made better.
526:
and redirect. When enough information is available (from enough sources), it might warrant its own article. At this point, though, it seems that this information would be more accessible and appropriate in the aforementioned article.
192:
because it is possible to define it. There is no evidence of notability from secondary sources and the article itself simply describes the construction while giving no information that does not directly follow from it.
160:
416:. It seems to me that the treatment of this algebra would be enriched by describing its provenance in the Cayley-Dickson construction and comparing its properties to those of other Cayley-Dickson algebras.
249:. Although true that one can in principle continue to apply the Cayley-Dickson construction infinitely, this seems to be the last notable case. (Of course, there is then the apparent paradox that the
355:
assertion of notability should be there. I agree with
Mblumber that more context should have been there, but to say it looked like gibberish is far too extreme; the nature of the topic was clear.
115:
154:
214:
because it's so technical, it's bordering on gibberish. Unless someone writes an accessible introduction, it's not useful for a general audience. --
470:
just added to the article shouldn't be there even if the article were to be kept, but I'm not going to remove it.) We don't even know that this is
120:
88:
83:
92:
75:
545:
373:
351:
47:
17:
175:
260:
142:
445:
394:
This page is not completely finished, and there is little information on the subject, so it may take a while to finish.
523:
494:
475:
434:
413:
572:
136:
36:
254:
571:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
510:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
557:
536:
514:
485:
450:
442:
425:
386:
364:
360:
336:
332:
317:
295:
264:
241:
223:
201:
132:
57:
482:
250:
182:
532:
383:
380:
304:
79:
506:
467:
402:
395:
308:
have appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, so your use of the term 'literature' is somewhat loose.--
237:
168:
356:
328:
219:
401:
I have even expanded it just a little bit, but still, it is not completed. 15:50 12/20/09 (EST)
479:
438:
421:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
148:
313:
197:
528:
71:
63:
553:
291:
278:
233:
215:
211:
417:
109:
463:
309:
193:
253:
would be notable by virtue of being the smallest non-notable such algebra ;-P)
549:
287:
274:
53:
474:
common name for the concept, even if the concept were worthy of mention in
466:
above. Google scholar has only 6 hits on the name. (The information that
502:
498:
497:. I too think the notability of these constructions ends with the
565:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
544:. All the information in the article looks like it's already in
462:) unless a book or survey paper mentions it, as indicated by
548:, so all of the merges above really amount to deletes.
105:
101:
97:
167:
286:. I was wrong. Yes, primary sources don't suffice.
327:that mention them in passing would be secondary.
51:. Not much to merge, so I'll just redirect this.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
575:). No further edits should be made to this page.
181:
8:
437:. As it stands now, this little stub is a
7:
24:
281:) 16:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
558:16:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
537:13:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
515:23:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
486:21:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
451:15:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
441:, albeit a mathematical one.
426:19:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
387:18:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
365:18:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
337:17:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
318:17:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
296:21:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
265:16:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
242:15:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
224:15:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
202:12:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
58:14:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
546:Cayley–Dickson construction
524:Cayley-Dickson construction
495:Cayley-Dickson construction
476:Cayley-Dickson construction
435:Cayley-Dickson construction
414:Cayley-Dickson construction
374:Cayley–Dickson construction
352:Cayley–Dickson construction
48:Cayley–Dickson construction
592:
568:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
210:. I nominated this for
350:Someone mentioned the
322:I'd have thought that
251:sexagintaquaternions
44:The result was
448:
583:
570:
446:
433:and redirect to
257:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
591:
590:
586:
585:
584:
582:
581:
580:
579:
573:deletion review
566:
255:
128:
119:
86:
72:Trigintaduonion
70:
67:
64:Trigintaduonion
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
589:
587:
578:
577:
561:
560:
539:
517:
507:JohnBlackburne
488:
468:Distortiondude
453:
428:
407:
406:
405:
403:Distortiondude
396:Distortiondude
389:
367:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
299:
298:
267:
256:Sławomir Biały
244:
226:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
588:
576:
574:
569:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
538:
534:
530:
525:
521:
518:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
487:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
452:
449:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
404:
400:
399:
397:
393:
390:
388:
385:
382:
378:
375:
371:
368:
366:
362:
358:
357:Michael Hardy
353:
349:
346:
345:
338:
334:
330:
329:Michael Hardy
325:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:WP:Notability
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
266:
262:
258:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
230:
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
567:
564:
541:
519:
490:
480:Arthur Rubin
471:
459:
455:
430:
409:
398:14:19 (EST)
391:
376:
369:
347:
323:
283:
270:
269:
246:
228:
207:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
52:
46:redirect to
45:
43:
31:
28:
501:if not the
155:free images
529:Spiral5800
439:WP:DICTDEF
503:Octonions
499:Sedenions
377:or delete
234:Gandalf61
216:Mblumber
116:View log
542:Comment
418:Plclark
348:Comment
161:WPÂ refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
483:(talk)
464:RDBury
460:delete
456:Userfy
310:RDBury
212:CSD G1
208:Delete
194:RDBury
133:Google
93:delete
522:into
520:Merge
493:into
491:Merge
478:. —
458:(aka
431:Merge
412:into
410:Merge
384:Adler
372:into
370:Merge
284:Merge
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
554:talk
550:Ozob
533:talk
511:talk
505:. --
447:ping
443:Pcap
422:talk
392:Keep
381:Hans
361:talk
333:talk
324:some
314:talk
292:talk
288:Ozob
279:talk
275:Ozob
271:Keep
261:talk
247:Keep
238:talk
229:Keep
220:talk
198:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:Tone
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
556:)
535:)
513:)
424:)
363:)
335:)
316:)
294:)
263:)
240:)
222:)
200:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
552:(
531:(
509:(
472:a
420:(
359:(
331:(
312:(
290:(
277:(
259:(
236:(
218:(
196:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.