197:, and was unable to turn up any reliable secondary sources. I found one article on eHow, which itself is not a reputable source, but which makes a claim of notability. The quote is: "The Oracle Tuxedo has acquired 80 percent of the market share. Customers including FedEx, Avis Budget Group, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia, University of Arizona and University of Wisconsin"
376:- A good number of sources have been provided, which appears sufficient to establish notability. The article is still in dire need of inline sourcing, but it should be worked on rather than deleted. Any admin, please feel free to close this as a speedy keep, per A1. Thanks. —
236:
Being a long way from home I'll defer digging out detailed evidence of notability, but Tuxedo is a well-known longstanding piece of integration software and a surprise nomination. One can find companies like RedHat specifically seeking to buy/build to provide rival tools:
305:
it has some historic value, alas before the days of the web so perhaps not much coverage is online. I did turn up some papers in academic journals for example, so it was notable for its time. Definitely needs citations and other work.
156:
261:
190:
No notability established by reliable sources. There are only two refs provided, one of which makes no mention of the software, and the other is a primary source written by the software architects.
258:
327:, giving for example "Tuxedo is a vintage TP monitor" (from 1997). But while its finest days may be behind it, it is a reference point: the O'Reilly book on Enterprise JavaBeans (2001,
117:
150:
187:
I wrote a detailed reason for deletion, but it was rejected (and deleted) by twinkle because I linked to eHow, which is blacklisted... Great. Here's a much shorter version.
282:
90:
85:
94:
77:
17:
171:
138:
353:- A major peice of middleware from way back when. Coverage exists in a lot of books. For example, there's quite a lot in this
212:
become a redirect. However, I don't believe there is any salvageable content, so that will (and should) amount to deletion. —
384:
220:
331:
354:
429:
132:
36:
128:
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
412:
391:
366:
343:
315:
294:
273:
249:
227:
59:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
324:
178:
269:
81:
387:
311:
223:
164:
144:
49:
238:
194:
328:
290:
265:
209:
73:
65:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
339:
245:
200:
I can find no backing for that statement elsewhere. I propose this article be merged with
408:
377:
362:
307:
213:
334:) opens its discussion on transaction processing in relation to both CICS and Tuxedo.
286:
111:
201:
335:
241:
323:
Another search that turns up plenty of results with a bit more time-depth is
404:
358:
257:. Plenty of coverage in independent reliable sources can be found via
205:
422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
163:
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
432:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
281:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
399:- The above !vote is actually a
1:
413:18:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
392:18:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
367:17:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
344:17:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
316:18:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
60:03:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
401:witdrawal of the nomination
295:01:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
274:15:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
250:21:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
228:17:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
449:
425:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
403:by the nominator. --
44:The result was
297:
210:Tuxedo_(software)
74:Tuxedo (software)
66:Tuxedo (software)
440:
427:
390:
226:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
56:
34:
448:
447:
443:
442:
441:
439:
438:
437:
436:
430:deletion review
423:
382:
240:, for example.
218:
124:
88:
72:
69:
58:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
446:
444:
435:
434:
418:
417:
416:
415:
370:
369:
347:
346:
318:
299:
298:
277:
276:
252:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
52:
50:The Bushranger
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
445:
433:
431:
426:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:Note to Admin
395:
394:
393:
389:
386:
381:
380:
375:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
304:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
222:
217:
216:
211:
207:
203:
198:
196:
191:
188:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
55:One ping only
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
424:
421:
400:
396:
378:
373:
350:
320:
302:
266:Phil Bridger
254:
233:
214:
199:
192:
189:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
48:. Also SK#1
45:
43:
31:
28:
202:BEA Systems
151:free images
332:0596002262
308:W Nowicki
287:• Gene93k
262:searches
193:I did a
118:View log
234:Comment
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
208:, and
206:Oracle
195:search
129:Google
95:delete
357:. --
336:AllyD
259:these
242:AllyD
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
409:talk
405:Whpq
379:Jess
374:Keep
363:talk
359:Whpq
355:book
351:Keep
340:talk
329:ISBN
325:this
321:Keep
312:talk
303:Keep
291:talk
270:talk
255:Keep
246:talk
215:Jess
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
46:keep
204:or
179:TWL
116:– (
411:)
383:·
365:)
342:)
314:)
293:)
285:.
272:)
264:.
248:)
219:·
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
407:(
388:♥
385:Δ
361:(
338:(
310:(
289:(
268:(
244:(
224:♥
221:Δ
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.