167:. Rule? More like an unverifiable theory. Correlation is not proof of anything. There are dozens of other trends at any given time that can harken back to a decade other than the one twenty years ago. This is the dressing up of an opinion based on coincidence that has no real encyclopedic value.
183:
it, let alone discuss the phenomenon, in either Google or Google Book searches. There is, however, a twenty year rule in law that comes up lots and lots, apparently relating to patents, so perhaps that could serve as a replacement for this once it's deleted. Oh, and by the way, there's a very
104:, July 17, 2004: "...It is the 20-year rule. It takes a good 20 years to get a feeling of nostalgia....When I was a kid in the 1970s everybody was nostalgic for the 1950s. "Happy Days" was the No. 1 show on television...". Or,
52:
108:
editorial, Nov. 18, 2005: "There's something of a 20-year rule in pop culture -- whatever was new 20 years ago is the retro fad of today." Or, Sacha
Orenstein,
283:
to some other article, for example, as mentioned above, nostalgia. This theory does seem to make sense; however, it shouldn't deserve its own article. --
49:
188:
17:
84:
unless sourced. Possible but unlikely that one of those worthless "cultural commentators" could have coined this expression.
184:
natural explanation for this: young adults nostalgic for their childhoods... when you're 28, you remember being 8 fondly...
216:
302:
36:
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
271:
246:
220:
195:
179:. I would love to keep this, I've heard of the term, but I just couldn't find any reliable sources that even
171:
159:
147:
131:
116:
109:
92:
75:
100:. Ah, but they have. E.g., via Lexis-Nexis, Michael O'Rourke, "I'll love the '90s, but not just yet,"
58:
284:
128:
113:
263:
Excellent idea. If the article isn't deleted (which it should be), then it should be merged into
258:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
243:
185:
144:
89:
268:
204:
203:
I agree with
Mangojuuice, this term could be useful, but we have to be careful about
168:
140:
255:
69:
237:
212:
208:
65:
156:
254:
A widely accepted and discussed theory is OK. This theory has a ways to go. -
264:
230:
85:
228:: It states its a theory so get off it. Have any of you heard of the term "
295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:
Both show evidence of existance, so why delete these articles. (
240:
here with both the 80s retro movement and this article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:). No further edits should be made to this page.
110:"The secret to the music biz (the 20 year rule)"
127:, unless more notable sources can be found.
8:
207:. Thus, the article has to be better
7:
236:You are attacking a strong part of
123:Notwithstanding my above comment,
24:
139:as this appears to be a one-off
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
247:23:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
221:23:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
196:19:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
172:19:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
160:18:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
148:16:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
132:16:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
117:16:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
93:16:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
76:15:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
50:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
288:04:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
272:23:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
53:06:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
322:
298:Please do not modify it.
102:San Antonio Express-News
32:Please do not modify it.
106:Omaha World-Herald
155:per Isotope23. --
313:
300:
193:
59:Twenty Year Rule
34:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
309:
303:deletion review
296:
219:
189:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
308:
307:
291:
290:
285:FlyingPenguins
277:
276:
275:
274:
251:
250:
223:
215:
198:
174:
162:
150:
134:
121:
120:
119:
64:Does not meet
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
306:
304:
299:
293:
292:
289:
286:
282:
279:
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
257:
253:
252:
248:
245:
241:
239:
233:
232:
227:
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
187:
182:
178:
175:
173:
170:
166:
163:
161:
158:
154:
151:
149:
146:
142:
138:
135:
133:
130:
126:
122:
118:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
96:
95:
94:
91:
87:
83:
80:
79:
78:
77:
74:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
297:
294:
280:
235:
229:
225:
200:
190:
180:
176:
164:
152:
136:
124:
105:
101:
97:
81:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
238:Pop Culture
226:STRONG KEEP
244:Tigerghost
205:neologisms
265:nostalgia
231:Nostalgia
145:Isotope23
141:neologism
269:Agent 86
209:verified
169:Agent 86
256:Nv8200p
129:Pan Dan
114:Pan Dan
98:Comment
70:Nv8200p
213:danntm
201:Delete
177:Delete
165:Delete
153:Delete
137:Delete
125:delete
82:Delete
46:delete
281:Merge
211:. --
191:juice
186:Mango
157:Aaron
86:David
16:<
259:talk
90:Talk
73:talk
66:WP:V
234:".
181:use
143:.--
112:.
48:.
267:.
88:|
249:)
217:C
68:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.