201:. His rationale, from the talk page, is as follows: "For almost 5 years this article has been of discussion. After review of existing citations there is little to no credibility of this project as an official idea. Just because a few news people have written to support it, it is opinion only. Donald Trump never adopted the plan to be built anywhere, much less NYC. The article in 2005 clearly presents a publicity opportunity for Donald Trump and no doubt it worked as shortly thereafter, the Freedom Tower's original design was changed to resemble the original North Tower. Recent endorsements by David Schuster were simply that, a newscasters personal opinion not fact. This article should be DELETED. It is not an article that can be Wikified and never will be. Continuing to present this article on Wiki allows for the failure of encyclopedic guidelines and diminishes the credibility of Wiki as a source. Delete now."
406:
past month have made the article a bit better but not good enough - the template that shows the model is locked and it advertises that this design is proposed even though language has been amended in the header, clearly COI. I have painstakingly read all the talk pages history and viewed the websites where this project is maintained. Personal websites on the internet do not qualify as reliable sources.
405:
as it is a one event idea from 2004 on a hypothetical project by one man and some groupies. ShadeofTime it is POV as this is one man's point of view on how he thinks the former WTC should be built and to boot, he is advertising that idea in this forum and has been since 2005. Recent edits within the
166:
423:
I don't think it deserves a separate article: it doesn't seem more notable than any of the hundreds of other proposals and competition designs for the site. However if there are any sources
281:
255:
121:
236:, I don't see problems with an unofficial design that can be found across the internet. I'm not an expert on the policies, though. . . Edit: I don't see any POV either.
160:
126:
306:
219:, as nominator. (I have searched for sources and seen that a few exist, but I'm not convinced this project deserves its own article.)
48:. Additional discussion about what to include in other related articles, whether or not to have a mention, etc, could take place, at
17:
94:
89:
98:
81:
181:
148:
49:
455:
36:
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
428:
324:
310:
241:
402:
369:
440:
415:
393:
381:
357:
328:
314:
296:
270:
245:
228:
210:
138:
63:
353:
377:
305:, reasons WP:PROMOTION, WP:NOTADVOCATE,WP:ONEEVENT, WP:NTEMP, WP:NOTOPINION, WP:SOAP, WP:NOTADVOCATE
188:
407:
198:
411:
174:
340:
389:; I don't see any reliable third-party sources that provide significant coverage of this topic.
320:
319:
But it's not POV! Just because it is unofficial doesn't mean that
Knowledge (XXG) advocates it.
237:
224:
206:
85:
292:
266:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
436:
349:
154:
373:
59:
390:
220:
202:
77:
69:
288:
262:
115:
401:; Shadowjams, there are no additional sources to be found and I feel it fails on
432:
54:
368:- It needs additional sources but I don't see any indication it fails
343:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
427:
to confer it some level of notability, it could be mentioned in
111:
107:
103:
173:
348:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
282:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
256:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
276:
250:
280:: This debate has been included in the
254:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
50:Talk:World Trade Center site
475:
425:independent of the subject
329:01:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
315:15:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
297:16:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
271:16:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
246:01:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
229:14:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
211:14:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
451:Please do not modify it.
441:01:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
416:15:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
394:19:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
382:01:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
358:00:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
197:Nominating on behalf of
64:17:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
429:World Trade Center site
44:The result was
360:
299:
285:
273:
259:
466:
453:
347:
345:
286:
260:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
449:
338:
134:
125:
92:
76:
73:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
444:
443:
418:
396:
384:
362:
361:
346:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
300:
274:
248:
231:
199:User:Skimlatte
195:
194:
131:
127:AfD statistics
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
419:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:WP:NOTABILITY
400:
397:
395:
392:
388:
385:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:WP:Notability
367:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
344:
342:
337:
336:
330:
326:
322:
321:ShadeofTime09
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
298:
294:
290:
283:
279:
275:
272:
268:
264:
257:
253:
249:
247:
243:
239:
238:ShadeofTime09
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:Twin Towers 2
75:
74:
71:
70:Twin Towers 2
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
424:
420:
398:
386:
365:
339:
307:74.89.193.37
302:
277:
251:
233:
216:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
350:Ron Ritzman
161:free images
374:Shadowjams
408:Skimlatte
289:• Gene93k
263:• Gene93k
341:Relisted
221:Robofish
203:Robofish
122:View log
217:Neutral
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
433:Elekhh
421:Delete
399:Delete
391:Powers
387:Delete
234:Oppose
139:Google
99:delete
46:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
116:views
108:watch
104:links
52:. --
16:<
437:talk
431:. --
412:talk
378:talk
366:Keep
354:talk
325:talk
311:talk
293:talk
278:Note
267:talk
252:Note
242:talk
225:talk
207:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
60:talk
55:Cirt
303:For
287:--
261:--
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
439:)
414:)
380:)
372:.
356:)
327:)
313:)
295:)
284:.
269:)
258:.
244:)
227:)
209:)
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
435:(
410:(
376:(
352:(
323:(
309:(
291:(
265:(
240:(
223:(
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.