383:
Then I guess the thing to do is tag it for "rescue" and see if the squad can make it any better. Because despite there being sources, I can find much myself about history etc. So even if it were sourced, it would still remain a simply definition, which we don't really want on
Knowledge (XXG) -
329:. As both are well-sourced and darn similar I'm curious why people seem to think one is okay and the other isn't. And yes, I know about OTHERTHINGSEXIST. I'm more asking if folks suggesting we delete here have reasons that would allow for Blogosphere or if they think both should go.
182:
130:
I deprodded to put on AfD. I'm putting this on afd because while the term gets thrown around occasionally and it requires consensus, although I don't believe it's notable (despite its
123:
261:
and we do not even need a redirect here. If anyone can be bothered to transwiki it then that is another option but my experience of this is that it isn't worth the bother.
157:
369:
It is well sourced. The article as it stands isn't, but AfD isn't about the current status of the article. It's already in paper books, I think we are in good shape.
185:
280:
17:
90:
85:
94:
77:
447:
36:
206:
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
419:(I don't mind which). This is nothing more than a dictionary defintion. It is borderline whether it would meet
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
194:
432:
393:
378:
364:
338:
317:
296:
270:
249:
245:
224:
172:
168:
146:
59:
57:
258:
142:
428:
389:
360:
292:
266:
221:
137:
The original version of the page suggested it had been created today; that part has been removed
81:
313:
241:
164:
50:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
284:
188:
374:
334:
202:
138:
355:, it's a nice page, which covers what the word means, who made it up, who uses it etc. -
347:
is "well sourced". We just don't use dictionary definitions here. Which is exactly what
424:
385:
356:
288:
237:
348:
344:
262:
236:. Anyone familiar with the subject would be unsurprised at that. Feel free to create
218:
73:
65:
325:
I think folks A) misunderstand WP:NNN and B) are making arguments that would delete
309:
111:
416:
352:
326:
233:
370:
330:
198:
308:, the most likely thing that people are wanting when they type this in.
420:
412:
305:
187:
pretty much defines the term. I think this meets the requirements of
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:
is, read it, all it has is what the word means. Now read
118:
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
158:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
152:
156:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
421:Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion
281:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
24:
217:dicdef. Belongs on Wiktionary.
181:Term gets plenty of use in RSes
257:Belongs in wiktionary. It is a
1:
467:
423:based on what I can find.
343:You can't really say that
394:15:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
379:02:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
365:07:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
339:02:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
318:19:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
297:19:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
271:17:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
250:14:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
225:14:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
173:01:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
147:00:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
443:Please do not modify it.
433:08:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
60:00:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
283:, nor do we include
302:Delete and redirect
238:Wikt:Twittersphere
44:The result was
211:
197:comment added by
175:
161:
458:
445:
232:but redirect to
210:
191:
162:
134:in mass media).
121:
115:
97:
53:
34:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
441:
192:
117:
88:
72:
69:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
436:
435:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
320:
299:
274:
273:
252:
227:
212:
176:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
444:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
395:
391:
387:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:Twittersphere
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
226:
223:
220:
216:
213:
208:
204:
200:
196:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
135:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:Twittersphere
71:
70:
67:
66:Twittersphere
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
442:
439:
408:
404:
322:
301:
287:. Per above
277:
259:WP:NEOLOGISM
254:
242:AuthorityTam
229:
214:
193:— Preceding
178:
165:TexasAndroid
153:
136:
131:
129:
52:Juliancolton
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
417:Blogosphere
353:Blogosphere
327:Blogosphere
234:Blogosphere
285:neologisms
139:Shadowjams
425:Thryduulf
409:redirect
263:Polargeo
207:contribs
195:unsigned
124:View log
413:Twitter
386:Kingpin
357:Kingpin
323:Comment
310:Nyttend
306:Twitter
289:Kingpin
91:protect
86:history
405:Delete
278:Delete
255:Delete
230:Delete
215:Delete
189:WP:NNN
119:delete
95:delete
46:delete
371:Hobit
331:Hobit
199:Hobit
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
429:talk
390:talk
375:talk
361:talk
345:this
335:talk
314:talk
293:talk
267:talk
246:talk
222:lute
219:Reso
203:talk
184:and
179:keep
169:talk
154:Note
143:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
415:or
411:to
407:or
304:to
163:--
132:use
48:. –
431:)
392:)
377:)
363:)
337:)
316:)
295:)
269:)
248:)
240:--
209:)
205:•
171:)
160:.
145:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
56:|
427:(
388:(
373:(
359:(
333:(
312:(
291:(
265:(
244:(
201:(
167:(
141:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.