31:
151:
Keep. Someone might encounter this term and want to know what it is -- e.g., is it a BBS or antivirus software. If the context makes clear it's a BBS, knowing the center of gravity of its participant base (Manchester U. CS people instead of a more general cross-section of the public) might be
137:
looks to be absolutely magnificent at a glance. However, I still don't believe that the UNaXcess bulletin board is noteworthy enough to be included. Since this is a very democratic process, other users can decide whether or not it stays. If it's as notable as you say, heck, it
69:
111:
Perhaps not, but an article about a bulletin board that only a few people at a college use is not, IMO, reason for inclusion. If the consensus is to keep, it wouldn't bother me. I'm of the
124:
It's not something that a "few people at college" use though. Yes, it's predominantly used by current/ex CS students but that doesn't make it a minor bulletin board.
133:
Comment: I don't want to "bite the newbie," as it were. In fact, I snuck a peek at your contributions and the article you wrote for
47:
17:
83:
Vanity page for a private website. Probably should be speedily deleted, but then again, we'd miss all the fun of the debate. -
93:
Why has this been voted for deletion? I've not heard any justification and I only wrote the article five minutes ago!
38:
68:
Discussion concluded and article kept on June 2, 2004. For the AfD that let to this article being deleted, see
162:
134:
165:
article, I just added to it, before anyone comes in and accuses me of taking credit for their work. :)
192:
169:
156:
146:
128:
119:
106:
97:
87:
175:
77:
61:
182:
153:
189:
143:
116:
84:
188:
Withdraw vote to delete. This is much larger and more relevant than I'd assumed. -
166:
125:
103:
94:
102:
Err, it's not a vanity page, it's information about a BBS dating back to the 80s.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
70:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UNaXcess (2nd nomination)
25:
161:
Just to make things clear, I didn't write all of the main
142:
stay and I'll withdraw my vote to delete in an instant. -
115:it doesn't belong, which is why I nominated it. -
174:Keep. I see no reason to delete this at all. -
8:
181:Keep unless the information is incorrect.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
29:
1:
209:
185:21:56, May 27, 2004 (UTC)
178:14:20, May 27, 2004 (UTC)
193:22:53, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
170:10:36, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
157:06:15, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
147:02:21, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
129:23:40, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
120:23:36, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
107:23:05, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
98:23:05, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
88:22:58, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
163:bulletin board system
135:Bulletin board system
42:of past discussions.
152:useful information.
60:Old discussion from
54:
53:
48:current main page
200:
33:
32:
26:
208:
207:
203:
202:
201:
199:
198:
197:
81:
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
206:
204:
196:
195:
186:
179:
172:
159:
149:
131:
122:
109:
100:
80:
75:
64:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
205:
194:
191:
187:
184:
180:
177:
173:
171:
168:
164:
160:
158:
155:
150:
148:
145:
141:
136:
132:
130:
127:
123:
121:
118:
114:
110:
108:
105:
101:
99:
96:
92:
91:
90:
89:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
71:
63:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
176:David Gerard
139:
112:
82:
67:
66:
55:
43:
37:
36:This is an
154:JamesMLane
190:Lucky 6.9
144:Lucky 6.9
117:Lucky 6.9
85:Lucky 6.9
78:UNaXcess
183:Abigail
167:Pwaring
126:Pwaring
113:opinion
104:Pwaring
95:Pwaring
39:archive
140:should
16:<
62:VfD
72:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.