Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/UEFA Euro 2008 Final - Knowledge

Source 📝

670:
as its pointless to delete the article for two weeks and recreate it then (as the final very definitely will deserve it's own article). It probably was unnecessary to create this article yet but deleting the article for such a short period is needless. Anyway strictly speaking it does meet WP:CRYSTAL
605:
it will be played. We know it is the culmination of a competition currently in progress. We know for certain that this article will be needed within a couple of weels, and we already have enough information for the article to have been started. It already has viable encyclopedic content, and it will
543:- Even if the match is never played, it would be useful to keep the article if only to explain why the match was never played. As it stands, the article is about the biggest match of the 2008 football calendar and I see no reason to delete it. I could even find you a few references if you want. – 137:
No sources, event is in the future, not clear as of yet whether or not an article will ever be needed for this. No prejudice against properly recreating whenever significant coverage specifically for the final can be found, and the parent article
166:
exists, and I'm sure all other Euro finals are planned to be made... World Cup, UEFA Cup, Champions League Final articles exist as well and all the tournaments are in the same category of importance, i would asume. ←
646:
No, I don't 'jest'. There is no information that merits an article split. It's idiotic to preemptively create article pages for upcoming events when there is no content that justifies a separate article.
251:- I would be shocked if this article wasn't recreated and of significant length and detail by the end of the month (two weeks away) if deleted. So what is the point of this AfD? - 623:
BTW, it took me about ten seconds to find verification of the information on this page and add it. I wonder how long it took to create this AFD? Longer than ten seconds, I bet...
357:
Notability isn't everything. So far there is no reason to have an article, as evidenced by the fact that the page is virtually empty and has no encyclopedic content whatsoever.
130: 97: 92: 101: 84: 17: 562:
to be included on article creation. Yes, please go ahead an add those references, and ideally some content based on them.
680: 658: 635: 618: 585: 573: 550: 527: 511: 494: 478: 456: 436: 409: 389: 368: 348: 328: 308: 287: 259: 235: 215: 194: 174: 153: 66: 59: 695: 88: 36: 694:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
345: 671:- (almost) certain to take place and with verifiable information on the location and time of the final. 653: 568: 522: 489: 451: 404: 363: 323: 282: 230: 189: 148: 163: 80: 72: 582: 547: 474: 432: 56:. This is unlikely to end in anything other than keep and currently there is consensus to do so. — 606:
soon get more. To delete it now would simply be a waste of everyone's time - a bit like this afd.
676: 629: 612: 505: 468: 383: 302: 209: 171: 425:. Absolutely keep. This is a notable event, and easily falls into the exceptions lined out in 426: 162:, it will be expanded in the coming month, would be very unnecessary to delete and re-create, 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
649: 564: 518: 485: 447: 400: 359: 319: 278: 226: 185: 183:
As I said in the nom: No prejudice against recreating when verifiable content is available.
144: 483:
Fully agree. What's the hurry in creating an article ahead of time, ahead of any content?
579: 544: 464: 139: 53: 672: 624: 607: 500: 378: 297: 204: 168: 49: 118: 445:
That would be a relevant criterion only if there were any encyclopedic content.
252: 377:
There's already encyclopedic content in the page - date, time, location.
597:. Surely you jest. Well beyond the requirements of WP:CRYSTAL. We know 272:
be created on the basis of reliable sources, and need to have at least
203:
There's already verifiable content in the page - date, time, location.
578:
I'll do it when I get home, as I'm going on a day out just now. –
142:
would then become overlong, so that splitting would be justified.
296:
There's already some content in the page - date, time, location.
688:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
601:
it will be played - down to the minute of kick-off. We know
499:
There's already content in the page - date, time, location.
125: 114: 110: 106: 471:The event is in two weeks. What's the hurry here? 469:
Don't demolish a house while it's still being built.
516:That information is already in the parent article. 398:That information is already in the parent article. 317:That information is already in the parent article. 224:That information is already in the parent article. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 698:). No further edits should be made to this page. 268:To drive home the message that articles should 558:? References are not some fancy luxury. They 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 715: 465:Knowledge has no deadline. 681:11:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 659:10:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 636:10:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 619:09:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 586:08:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 574:08:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 551:08:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 528:10:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 512:09:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 495:08:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 479:06:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 457:06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 437:06:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 410:10:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 390:09:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 369:06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 349:06:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 329:10:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 309:09:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 288:06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 260:06:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 236:10:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 216:09:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 195:06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 175:05:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 154:05:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 67:12:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 691:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 164:UEFA Euro 2004 Final 81:UEFA Euro 2008 Final 73:UEFA Euro 2008 Final 44:The result was 632: 615: 508: 386: 346:Narutolovehinata5 344:- It is notable. 305: 212: 65: 706: 693: 630: 613: 506: 477: 435: 384: 303: 257: 210: 128: 122: 104: 62: 57: 34: 714: 713: 709: 708: 707: 705: 704: 703: 702: 696:deletion review 689: 657: 572: 526: 493: 472: 455: 430: 408: 367: 327: 286: 253: 234: 193: 152: 124: 95: 79: 76: 64: 60: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 712: 710: 701: 700: 684: 683: 664: 663: 662: 661: 648: 641: 640: 639: 638: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 563: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 517: 514: 484: 460: 459: 446: 440: 439: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 399: 393: 392: 372: 371: 358: 352: 351: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 318: 312: 311: 291: 290: 277: 263: 262: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 225: 219: 218: 198: 197: 184: 178: 177: 143: 140:UEFA Euro 2008 135: 134: 75: 70: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 711: 699: 697: 692: 686: 685: 682: 678: 674: 669: 666: 665: 660: 655: 651: 645: 644: 643: 642: 637: 634: 633: 626: 622: 621: 620: 617: 616: 609: 604: 600: 596: 593: 587: 584: 581: 577: 576: 575: 570: 566: 561: 557: 554: 553: 552: 549: 546: 542: 539: 538: 529: 524: 520: 515: 513: 510: 509: 502: 498: 497: 496: 491: 487: 482: 481: 480: 476: 470: 466: 462: 461: 458: 453: 449: 444: 443: 442: 441: 438: 434: 428: 424: 421: 420: 411: 406: 402: 397: 396: 395: 394: 391: 388: 387: 380: 376: 375: 374: 373: 370: 365: 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 350: 347: 343: 340: 339: 330: 325: 321: 316: 315: 314: 313: 310: 307: 306: 299: 295: 294: 293: 292: 289: 284: 280: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 258: 256: 250: 247: 246: 237: 232: 228: 223: 222: 221: 220: 217: 214: 213: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 191: 187: 182: 181: 180: 179: 176: 173: 170: 165: 161: 158: 157: 156: 155: 150: 146: 141: 132: 127: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77: 74: 71: 69: 68: 63: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 690: 687: 667: 628: 611: 602: 598: 594: 559: 555: 540: 504: 422: 382: 341: 301: 273: 269: 254: 248: 208: 159: 136: 48:per partial 46:Speedy close 45: 43: 31: 28: 650:dorftrottel 595:Strong keep 565:dorftrottel 519:dorftrottel 486:dorftrottel 448:dorftrottel 401:dorftrottel 360:dorftrottel 320:dorftrottel 279:dorftrottel 227:dorftrottel 186:dorftrottel 145:dorftrottel 427:WP:CRYSTAL 276:content. 673:Davewild 625:Grutness 608:Grutness 501:Grutness 475:ShinmaWa 433:ShinmaWa 379:Grutness 298:Grutness 205:Grutness 131:View log 98:protect 93:history 54:WP:SNOW 255:Shudde 126:delete 102:delete 61:Maggot 52:, and 603:where 129:) – ( 119:views 111:watch 107:links 50:WP:SK 16:< 677:talk 668:Keep 654:talk 631:wha? 614:wha? 599:when 569:talk 560:need 556:Even 541:Keep 523:talk 507:wha? 490:talk 452:talk 423:Keep 405:talk 385:wha? 364:talk 342:Keep 324:talk 304:wha? 283:talk 274:some 270:only 249:Keep 231:talk 211:wha? 190:talk 172:dler 169:chan 160:Keep 149:talk 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 627:... 610:... 583:Jay 580:Pee 548:Jay 545:Pee 503:... 473:-- 467:2) 463:1) 431:-- 429:. 381:... 300:... 207:... 679:) 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 675:( 656:) 652:( 571:) 567:( 525:) 521:( 492:) 488:( 454:) 450:( 407:) 403:( 366:) 362:( 326:) 322:( 285:) 281:( 233:) 229:( 192:) 188:( 151:) 147:( 133:) 123:( 121:) 83:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:SK
WP:SNOW
Maggot
12:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
UEFA Euro 2008 Final
UEFA Euro 2008 Final
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
UEFA Euro 2008
dorftrottel
talk
05:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
UEFA Euro 2004 Final
chan
dler
05:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
dorftrottel
talk
06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.