Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/UFC 149 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

574:, because barring robocalypse or carmegeddon or something, these events will happen, so deleting them now is just a waste and would mean unnecessarily having to start over again. These are article that again barring Raganarock ;0 or something will exist because they concern the leading MMA promotion in our solar system and will have lasting relevance in that ever growing sport's history as a consequence. If anything, over the coming weeks, more sources will continue to be written about these events. Their notability is only going to increase! -- 52:. Merge into a list of UFC events, and do similarly for all future events (If there isn;pt a suitable one, make one, perhaps by year) . Before they take place, the articles will come much too close to promotion to justify separate articles. It seems the clearest basis for deciding. I admit I have no idea what to do with them after they take place--the discussion below gives the relevant factors, but does not reach any clear conclusion; but for future events, the added factor of CRYSTAL and promotion are sufficient to rule out separate articles. 776:
on the type of articles that are out on the event. So for example if they are covered by USA Today and The New York Times in America, the The Sun in Britain, or the Times in India (in India of course) then it has the right to say that it goes beyond routine coverage and is given a higher rating of notability.
775:
or any of these clearly pointless Knowledge (XXG) policies that actually have no effect what-so-ever on keeping or deleting UFC events because they are ALL on here anyway regardless of whatever policies they fail. So I just say why not just rate an event (UFC or any other MMA Promotion's event) based
353:
hold its first event in the country's capital and is getting a very high number of news sources covering them, both independent from the promotion and the sport itself, the event was being headlined by two very notable fighters. I would consider that a notable event personally, in the same way that
352:
as separate promotions that hold events as regularly as possible. Just because a title isn't on the line or something out of the ordinary is happening at one of these events doesn't mean it isn't significant. For example an new major promotion in a country that has never held an MMA event which is
478:
Lol! If you do not think all UFC related events are notable then you do not know what you are talking about and should not be commenting in MMA related discussions. UFC is THE preeiminet MMA promotion. Their events are part of the larger history of MMA. There is even a printed publsihed UFC
300:
Because lets be honest, we know they are going to happen, its not like the UFC is going to go bankrupt tomorrow, or stop doing MMA events and only doing ballroom dancing :P. Besides, all the needed GNG standard articles will come out very soon anyway so we are just wasting words here.
744:
and I think there is sufficient sources to keep the article (even if it isn't sourced in the UFC 147 or TUF Brazil articles. I'll provide them if necessary). UFC 148 and 149, while are all but guaranteed to happen the date, location, and specific fight cards are completely
766:
Is there really any point to this AfD, when you think about it you can set up one for every single UFC event from now till Doomsday and all the past events included, but the fact is that each and every one IS going to stay on Knowledge (XXG) whether or not it meets
225:- I would also include these, which have a couple more unreliable sources, but is still not being covered by mainstream outlets thus notability isn't firmly established. Th rush to create these articles before anything is announced isn't helpful. 592:
Technically, the notability can't go lower, since it hasn't been established by anything but a rumor. So if the notability changes, it can only go up. That doesn't change the fact that notability doesn't exist now.
160: 493:
Unless that encyclopedia is about UFC 149, your comment has no bearing on this discussion. No one has argued the UFC article should be removed, only that there's no indication that this event is notable.
736:
I am extremely hesitant to make this !vote because of the amount of flak I have taken on my user talk page in the last week, which has me very close to becoming an inactive editor as far as the
528:
debate? If you want to prove notability, wait a week or two instead of trying to run this thing under the ground until the next time, which ain't likely for these pages based on their votes.
421:
This event was announced by credible sources and is notable. Also a fight between Fabricio Werdum and Mike Russow is in the works for UFC 147, so deleting that would not be helpful at all.
919:
Discuss based upon the individual subject, not the subject's overarching classification or type. If a subject under discussion is independently notable, provide the evidence to show that.
243: 121: 479:
specific encyclopedia for Christmas's sake! That's right a book! What's worthy of devoted an entire book encyclopedia too is worthwhile for a paperless one as well. --
154: 192: 438:
all UFC events as inherently notable, because not a single UFC event is not covered in multiple sources or does not have historic significance. Period. --
837: 667: 616: 579: 515: 319:
It's true these events will happen, but it's also true that it's hard to see how these events will have the "lasting significance" required by
966: 953: 802: 278:
they are not historically significant, they are covered by only routine coverage; WP is an encyclopaedia and not a sports results service.
974: 793:
due to coverage beyond results. It is notable because of who is involved, the amount of coverage, the audience, etc., i.e. it passes
663: 612: 575: 511: 17: 389: 480: 439: 711:
Just because an event will occur doesn't make it notable. This will be another article giving just the results and failing
741: 471: 402: 385: 366: 289: 995: 40: 175: 94: 89: 384:. Encyclopedias and almanacs do indeed cover sports results, especially ones that do not have paper limitations. -- 142: 679: 637: 98: 970: 957: 806: 879:
is notable and already has an article. We are saying that not every single thing that they do is notable. See
857:
Are these guys really trying to say the UFC isnt notable? All these events were announced by reliable sources.
81: 689: 647: 930: 892: 598: 230: 204: 136: 991: 836:
Also, for anyone interested, look up this event and determine yourselves whether it is notable or not -
684: 642: 426: 36: 880: 794: 772: 746: 712: 132: 908: 862: 724: 484: 443: 168: 961: 934: 912: 896: 866: 848: 826: 785: 758: 728: 699: 671: 657: 620: 602: 583: 566: 537: 519: 503: 488: 473: 457: 447: 430: 393: 332: 310: 291: 255: 234: 208: 63: 822: 754: 562: 499: 251: 798: 768: 716: 381: 320: 275: 814:
This IP has had !votes removed from AfD discussions in the past due to attempted vote stacking
182: 926: 888: 844: 781: 594: 533: 345: 306: 226: 200: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
990:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
406: 323:. That's true of pretty much all MMA events, but good luck trying to get rid of UFC events. 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
466: 422: 328: 284: 922: 737: 949: 884: 196: 917:
Except the policy I just linked specifically says that this is not true. Specifically
904: 858: 720: 818: 750: 558: 495: 247: 148: 59: 840: 777: 529: 302: 85: 115: 921:
meaning you must provide multiple sources from independent sources, or it fails
461: 324: 279: 676:
Why would I mean that? King voted delete on the 6th. I'm voting delete today
344:
Well the fact is that MMA events simply cannot be compared to other sport like
54: 903:
Well I'd say a UFC event where fights occur is always gunna be notable.
362: 358: 271: 267: 221: 215: 77: 69: 349: 662:
By that logic, you actually mean we should keep all three then? --
354: 984:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
876: 524:
Papaursa, if that was the case then why is this under a
815: 410: 111: 107: 103: 167: 195:
was, not notable, not announced, not sourceable by a
611:
It is sufficiently notable for Knowledge (XXG). --
181: 274:, and frankly almost all of them, these just fail 244:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions 193:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UFC on FX 4 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 998:). No further edits should be made to this page. 557:No reason is given why this event is notable. 838:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/BAMMA 9 8: 242:Note: This debate has been included in the 241: 740:is concerned. UFC 147 is the finale of 734:Delete UFC 148 and UFC 149, Keep UFC 147 380:due to their historical notability per 365:and many others are notable as par how 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 801:with flying colors. Go Snoopy! -- 948:as every UFC event is notable per 24: 456:No they are not - have a read of 50:merge to a place to be decided 1: 809:) 15:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 664:The Bachmann Editor Overdrive 613:The Bachmann Editor Overdrive 576:The Bachmann Editor Overdrive 512:The Bachmann Editor Overdrive 405:has been blocked for Abusing 1015: 962:13:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 935:00:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 913:22:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 897:13:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 867:15:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 849:09:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 827:15:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 786:10:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 759:04:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 729:17:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 700:00:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 672:22:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 658:22:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 621:22:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 603:22:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 584:22:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 567:18:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 538:09:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 520:22:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 504:18:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 489:22:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 474:20:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 448:14:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC) 64:01:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC) 431:23:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 394:16:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 333:15:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 311:11:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 292:23:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 256:15:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 235:15:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 209:15:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 987:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 403:Temporary for Bonaparte 386:Temporary for Bonaparte 367:Temporary for Bonaparte 510:Are you kidding?! -- 975:few or no other edits 526:Articles for Deletion 977:outside this topic. 199:, crystal balling. 48:The result was 978: 829: 632:Delete all three: 415: 407:multiple accounts 346:American Football 258: 1006: 989: 964: 925:and any subset. 810: 696: 692: 687: 682: 654: 650: 645: 640: 469: 464: 413: 397: 348:a but more like 287: 282: 186: 185: 171: 119: 101: 34: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 996:deletion review 985: 967:172.130.252.250 954:172.130.252.250 803:173.241.225.163 738:MMA WikiProject 694: 690: 685: 680: 652: 648: 643: 638: 467: 462: 409: 285: 280: 197:reliable source 128: 92: 76: 73: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1012: 1010: 1001: 1000: 980: 979: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 900: 899: 870: 869: 831: 830: 788: 761: 731: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 606: 605: 587: 586: 569: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 522: 451: 450: 433: 416: 373: 372: 371: 370: 336: 335: 295: 294: 260: 259: 238: 237: 189: 188: 125: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1011: 999: 997: 993: 988: 982: 981: 976: 972: 968: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 944: 943: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 873: 872: 871: 868: 864: 860: 856: 853: 852: 851: 850: 846: 842: 839: 835: 828: 824: 820: 816: 813: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 789: 787: 783: 779: 774: 770: 765: 762: 760: 756: 752: 748: 743: 739: 735: 732: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 707: 701: 698: 697: 693: 688: 683: 675: 674: 673: 669: 665: 661: 660: 659: 656: 655: 651: 646: 641: 633: 630: 629: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 604: 600: 596: 591: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 573: 570: 568: 564: 560: 556: 553: 552: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 492: 491: 490: 486: 482: 477: 476: 475: 472: 470: 465: 459: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 445: 441: 437: 434: 432: 428: 424: 420: 417: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374: 369:describes it. 368: 364: 360: 356: 351: 347: 343: 340: 339: 338: 337: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 293: 290: 288: 283: 277: 273: 269: 265: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 240: 239: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 218: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 184: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130:Find sources: 126: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 986: 983: 945: 927:Dennis Brown 918: 889:Dennis Brown 854: 833: 832: 811: 790: 763: 733: 708: 678: 677: 636: 635: 631: 595:Dennis Brown 571: 554: 525: 435: 418: 398: 377: 376: 341: 316: 297: 296: 263: 227:Dennis Brown 220: 214: 201:Dennis Brown 190: 178: 172: 164: 157: 151: 145: 139: 129: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 973:) has made 634:per MtKing 423:Glock17gen4 155:free images 881:WP:INHERIT 795:WP:ROUTINE 773:WP:ROUTINE 747:WP:CRYSTAL 742:TUF Brazil 713:WP:ROUTINE 681:Purpleback 639:Purpleback 992:talk page 905:JadeSnake 859:JadeSnake 721:Astudent0 481:63.3.19.1 458:WP:MMANOT 440:63.3.19.1 266:this and 37:talk page 994:or in a 875:No, the 855:Keep all 819:TreyGeek 799:WP:EVENT 791:Keep all 769:WP:EVENT 751:TreyGeek 717:WP:EVENT 559:Papaursa 496:Papaursa 382:WP:EVENT 321:WP:EVENT 276:WP:EVENT 248:TreyGeek 122:View log 39:or in a 841:BigzMMA 834:Comment 778:BigzMMA 764:Comment 530:BigzMMA 363:BAMMA 1 359:Pride 1 342:Comment 317:Comment 303:BigzMMA 272:UFC 147 268:UFC 148 222:UFC 147 216:UFC 148 161:WP refs 149:scholar 95:protect 90:history 78:UFC 149 70:UFC 149 952:. -- 923:WP:GNG 709:Delete 555:Delete 411:(diff) 350:Boxing 325:Mdtemp 264:Delete 133:Google 99:delete 950:WP:RS 885:WP:RS 812:Note: 749:. -- 355:UFC 1 191:Like 176:JSTOR 137:books 116:views 108:watch 104:links 60:talk 16:< 971:talk 958:talk 946:Keep 931:talk 909:talk 893:talk 883:and 863:talk 845:talk 823:talk 807:talk 797:and 782:talk 755:talk 725:talk 715:and 695:≈≈≈≈ 686:pack 668:talk 653:≈≈≈≈ 644:pack 617:talk 599:talk 580:talk 572:Keep 563:talk 534:talk 516:talk 500:talk 485:talk 468:king 444:talk 436:Keep 427:talk 419:Keep 399:Note 390:talk 378:Keep 329:talk 307:talk 298:Keep 286:king 270:and 252:talk 231:talk 219:and 205:talk 169:FENS 143:news 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 887:. 877:UFC 183:TWL 120:– ( 55:DGG 965:— 960:) 933:) 911:) 895:) 865:) 847:) 825:) 817:-- 784:) 771:, 757:) 727:) 719:. 691:89 670:) 649:89 619:) 601:) 582:) 565:) 536:) 518:) 502:) 487:) 463:Mt 460:. 446:) 429:) 401:: 392:) 361:, 357:, 331:) 309:) 281:Mt 254:) 246:. 233:) 207:) 163:) 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 62:) 969:( 956:( 929:( 907:( 891:( 861:( 843:( 821:( 805:( 780:( 753:( 723:( 666:( 615:( 597:( 578:( 561:( 532:( 514:( 498:( 483:( 442:( 425:( 414:. 388:( 327:( 305:( 250:( 229:( 203:( 187:) 179:· 173:· 165:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 135:( 127:( 124:) 118:) 80:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
DGG
talk
01:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
UFC 149
UFC 149
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/UFC on FX 4
reliable source
Dennis Brown

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.