381:
for discussion and consensus as to how to handle them (there may be certain classes to keep and others to just put into a list for instance based on tonnage) Then they could all be treated the same in a systematic way. FWIW, I'm not sure the U.S. Navy still considers its tugs as commissioned vessels
253:
Not useful precedents. One is a destroyer (a major warship). One is a patrol boat, but one which at least saw action. In the third, the AfD was very brief with comments like 'started by a troll'. The present case is a minor naval vessel which seems to have spent its career shunting ships around
263:
There are two implicit precedents here: #1 there have been only 3 AfDs of any commissioned ships and #2 there are a ton of other Navy tug articles that have been around unmolested for a long time and edited by a number of editors.
180:, unless there is something significant about her. My view would be that any major warship (destroyer or larger) deserves its own article, but that otherwise undistinguished historical tugs etc should be listed on a class page.
378:
200:
377:- after this AfD, regardless of the outcome, if you think we should reexamine the notability of really little ships like tugs (which I think is a fair question), then I suggest raising the issue at
227:
222:
110:
192:-- traditionally, commissioned naval vessels (in the U. S. Navy, those designated with a "USS") have been considered inherently notable. We presently have 100+ tugs listed in
302:
166:
And why exactly would they be? Unless they say anything but "Was build, tugged some Navy ships, then was sold for scrap", dump them all into a list without links.
395:, down to the last patrol boat and 'miscellaneous craft': I think it would be sensible to talk about it before unleashing every single one on its own article.
217:
435:
Notability thresholds for military units have occasionally been a vexed issued on the
Military History Wikiproject, but the convention is that all ships
118:
439:
into a national navy are automatically notable. While discussing this again wouldn't hurt, I'd lean towards maintaining this convention in line with
83:
78:
87:
469:
455:- What it comes down to then: Is this a commissioned ship or is it a commissioned boat? And are commissioned boats also automatically notable?
443:. This is clearly an excellent test case for the notability threshold as the only reason the tug is notable is because it was commissioned. --
70:
201:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Military history/Maritime warfare task force#Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/USS Watseka (YT-387)
17:
214:
and found only these precedents (the only other hits were for obscure fictional ships and starships), which all closed as keep:
522:
36:
193:
152:
504:
488:
459:
447:
427:
415:
399:
369:
348:
336:
319:
292:
272:
258:
246:
184:
170:
159:
143:
125:
52:
74:
521:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
392:
49:
66:
58:
365:
357:
316:
440:
444:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
139:
485:
424:
329:
289:
269:
243:
211:
501:
361:
411:
It makes
Knowledge (XXG) more useful if there are articles about all naval vessels.--
396:
309:
255:
181:
456:
167:
122:
104:
412:
391:
Very sensible. I have a book with information on every ship which served in the
382:
except perhaps the big ocean-going tugs (which may have all been transferred to
345:
135:
482:
379:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Military history/Maritime warfare task force
333:
266:
240:
473:
156:
117:
Unremarkable Navy tugboat, biggest claim to fame is that it's one of the
477:
206:
I searched for "Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/USS" using both
515:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
207:
228:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/USS Wheatland (AKA-85)
223:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/USS Sproston (DD-577)
344:
per TomTheHand. Commissioned ship in any Navy is notable.
100:
96:
92:
360:
in any major world navy is notable for any vessel. --
288:. Commissioned naval vessels are inherently notable.
423:, unless there is something significant about her.
203:
asking for their opinion on the notability question.
151:
encyclopedic topic along with the other articles in
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
525:). No further edits should be made to this page.
218:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/USS PT-337
441:Knowledge (XXG) not being a paper encyclopedia
468:How are you defining "boat"? Many would call
8:
134:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a naval directory.
301:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
121:(a Native American woman that is).
303:list of Military-related deletions
24:
208:Knowledge (XXG)'s built-in search
194:Category:United States Navy tugs
153:Category:United States Navy tugs
119:Naval vessels named for a woman
1:
505:02:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
489:01:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
460:18:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
448:09:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
428:08:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
416:04:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
400:19:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
370:15:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
349:14:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
337:14:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
320:13:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
293:14:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
273:14:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
259:14:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
247:14:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
185:14:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
171:01:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
53:15:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
160:10:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
144:20:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
126:17:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
476:and the one on the right a
542:
470:the watercraft on the left
199:I have left a message at
518:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
393:Imperial Japanese Navy
196:and 2 sub-categories.
67:USS Watseka (YT-387)
59:USS Watseka (YT-387)
472:in this picture a
358:commissioned ship
322:
318:
306:
533:
520:
487:
384:
383:
315:
312:
307:
297:
271:
245:
108:
90:
34:
541:
540:
536:
535:
534:
532:
531:
530:
529:
523:deletion review
516:
481:
356:- Serving as a
310:
265:
239:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
539:
537:
528:
527:
510:
508:
507:
494:
493:
492:
491:
463:
462:
450:
430:
418:
405:
404:
403:
402:
386:
385:
372:
351:
339:
323:
295:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
225:
220:
204:
187:
174:
173:
163:
162:
146:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
538:
526:
524:
519:
513:
512:
511:
506:
503:
500:as per A. B.
499:
496:
495:
490:
486:
484:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
458:
454:
451:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
426:
422:
419:
417:
414:
410:
407:
406:
401:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
387:
380:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
347:
343:
340:
338:
335:
331:
327:
324:
321:
317:
313:
304:
300:
296:
294:
291:
287:
284:
283:
274:
270:
268:
262:
261:
260:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
242:
237:
236:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
215:
213:
209:
205:
202:
198:
197:
195:
191:
188:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:
172:
169:
165:
164:
161:
158:
154:
150:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
517:
514:
509:
497:
452:
445:Nick Dowling
437:commissioned
436:
432:
420:
408:
374:
353:
341:
325:
298:
285:
189:
177:
148:
131:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
425:Trekphiler
375:Suggestion
330:TomTheHand
290:TomTheHand
502:Edward321
362:Kralizec!
254:harbour.
397:The Land
311:FayssalF
256:The Land
182:The Land
111:View log
457:Lars T.
453:Comment
328:as per
168:Lars T.
123:Lars T.
84:protect
79:history
50:W.marsh
474:"boat"
421:Delete
413:Toddy1
346:Jinian
332:et al
212:Google
178:Delete
136:Stifle
132:Delete
88:delete
483:A. B.
478:"tug"
334:Benea
267:A. B.
241:A. B.
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
498:Keep
480:. --
433:Keep
409:Keep
366:talk
354:Keep
342:Keep
326:Keep
299:Note
286:Keep
210:and
190:Keep
149:Keep
140:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
305:.
157:Fg2
109:– (
368:)
314:-
264:--
238:--
155:.
142:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
364:(
308:—
138:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.