Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Unique Device Identification - Knowledge

Source 📝

192:--the author is following this: sources have been provided to establish that this is indeed the FDA in the US, and that the concept exists. I would dare to guess, from looking at a couple of those FDA links, that this is notable, though you could never tell from the article, which is barely English. A quick Google search reveals no newspaper coverage, though there is lots of coverage from inside the medical and nutritional profession. I think this might be a keeper--though every single clause in the article needs to be rewritten to conform to the rules of English grammar. 241:
Surprisingly, this is actually pretty interesting. Or so it seems. :) The FDA is insisting that medical devices (noting that devices covers virtually everything that isn't pharmaceutical - bandages, beds, etc) have a unique ID, which is consistent in spite of product names or model numbers. It will
242:
standardize ordering, make recalls more effective, and improve tracking of adverse effects. There are a few good sources which should be enough to clean it up a bit, if I or another editor can grab the time. -
260:
I've added a bit to the article, including some refs which should establish notability. I can't do much at the moment, but I'll try to come back to it later if it survives AfD with the changes. -
116: 173:(FDA) mentioned is the American one. Although I suppose most countries should have a similar government body, I don't know of any that use the same name and abbreviation. -- 83: 78: 87: 70: 298:. At last we have some context, i.e. that this is about medical devices in the United States. The references indicate that this is a notable subject. 74: 17: 338: 323: 307: 285: 269: 251: 233: 218: 201: 182: 164: 136: 52: 131: 170: 66: 58: 155:
What country's law is this about? What sort of device is it about? I haven't got a clue from reading the article.
353: 36: 352:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
336: 216: 303: 160: 320: 332: 212: 299: 156: 129: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
224:
I agree. I think the author is on to something; let's keep it so some more work can be done.
316: 281: 229: 197: 265: 247: 178: 150: 124: 49: 104: 277: 225: 193: 261: 243: 331:. Refs indicate notability and article has changed sufficiently to be kept. 123:
Is this really important/notable? No sources, maybe merge into FDA article?
174: 315:. Current sourcing appears adequate to define context and notability. 346:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111: 100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 356:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 276:Bilby, you have done excellent work. Bravo. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 317:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 1: 183:13:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 165:20:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 137:19:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 339:00:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 324:20:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 308:18:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 286:00:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 270:17:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 252:16:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 234:15:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 219:09:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 202:05:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 171:Food and Drug Administration 67:Unique Device Identification 59:Unique Device Identification 53:00:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 373: 349:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 149:Possibly speedy under 169:I would bet that the 294:Changing opinion to 207:Perhaps we should 364: 351: 114: 108: 90: 44:The result was 34: 372: 371: 367: 366: 365: 363: 362: 361: 360: 354:deletion review 347: 134: 127: 110: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 370: 368: 359: 358: 342: 341: 326: 310: 291: 290: 289: 288: 273: 272: 255: 254: 236: 222: 204: 187: 186: 185: 132: 125: 121: 120: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 369: 357: 355: 350: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 330: 327: 325: 322: 318: 314: 311: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 257: 256: 253: 249: 245: 240: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 221: 220: 217: 214: 210: 205: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 154: 152: 147:(see below). 146: 145: 141: 140: 139: 138: 135: 130: 128: 118: 113: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 348: 345: 328: 312: 300:Phil Bridger 295: 238: 208: 206: 189: 157:Phil Bridger 148: 143: 142: 122: 45: 43: 31: 28: 211:this... - 133:(contribs) 151:WP:CSD#A1 117:View log 84:protect 79:history 50:John254 278:Drmies 226:Drmies 209:userfy 194:Drmies 144:Delete 112:delete 88:delete 262:Bilby 244:Bilby 126:David 115:) – ( 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 329:Keep 321:talk 313:Keep 304:talk 296:keep 282:talk 266:talk 248:talk 239:Keep 230:talk 198:talk 190:Note 179:talk 175:Itub 161:talk 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 46:keep 333:Mgm 213:Mgm 319:- 306:) 284:) 268:) 250:) 232:) 200:) 181:) 163:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 335:| 302:( 280:( 264:( 246:( 228:( 215:| 196:( 177:( 159:( 153:. 119:) 109:( 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
John254
00:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Unique Device Identification
Unique Device Identification
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
David

(contribs)
19:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
WP:CSD#A1
Phil Bridger
talk
20:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Food and Drug Administration
Itub
talk
13:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Drmies

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.