384:". Well, not really. Granted there are slight variations here and there, and there are one or two unions that are just run in a completely different mannor that probably are notable enough for their own article, but on the whole all SUs are pretty much the same. There's pretty much nothing that differentiates one SU from the next, and I've made very sure that I've only nominated those that don't appear to have anything particularly notable about them. There are others that I may nominate, depending on the outcome of these few, but equally there are others that I won't nominate, 'cause I feel that they are notable enough to satisfy
290:
improved. A lot of good information is included in this article and it should be tagged for improvement not deletion as the article in itself it worthy of an entry. If the article was merged back in to the
University article it would take up too higher proportion of the article as an independent institution. --
206:
Well, that's true of any students' union. However, in terms of notability and being verifiable, I really don't think that the
University associated with a particular students' union is remotely independant enough - just one example springs to mind: the university will be using the union in all sorts
354:
I can't see the benefit of deleting articles about
Student Unions. It is impossible to create a catch all article as each student union is run in a different way and have different policies. This discussion would be far better served by having it on all student unions and not individual discussion.
151:
diff, showing the difference between the start of the last AfD discussion and now. In terms of external sources: a few have been added to the campaigns section, but I don't think they're specific to this union, and as such don't aid the notability of this article. Other than that, one BBC reference
289:
The article has been revised with the wider union's activities included, it is a unique union in the UK with its varying activities and left wing politics. It is also only one of the few that have no president. The article does still lack some sources but they are being added and the article
441:
about a better way forward of encouraging people to get decent sourcing whilst at the same time getting an actual policy about inherent notability in place, rather than the current mess of individual AFDs on the same basic issue having different outcomes.
78:
438:
459:
until we actually have a policy. My view is that they are are notable if from a major university. The details of how they are run are not significant. lets get consensus in a proper way with broad participation.
238:
of facts is reasonable, for example stating that RamAir broadcast on FM. As you say material may be promotional in tone, but the facts are still correct (it would fall under advertising standards if they lied)
411:
This is why (as last time I pointed out that it is one of very few (not sure if its unique) that do not have a union president, hence making it unusual, and to a lesser extent they way sports are run. --
73:
356:
132:
230:
Not as a source of notability, that wasn't my point, it was that they are to separate institutions with a close relationship but not affiliated to each other. Using it as a
105:
100:
109:
92:
207:
of promotional material to attract students, thus it is in the university's interest to place the union in a good light, thus it has a biased slant.
471:
451:
425:
403:
368:
345:
323:
299:
281:
253:
222:
198:
175:
57:
333:
184:
The union is independent of the university (that's rather the point) the union cannot directly influence what the university puts out. --
48:. Discussion shows that at this time, there is no consensus for deleting oer merging the info on this student union. Non-admin closure.
96:
17:
420:
276:
248:
193:
88:
63:
447:
53:
156:, the University's own website, i.e. not exactly an independant source. For this reason, I feel that this article
489:
36:
488:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
376:
I did consider creating one AfD for the lot, but wasn't sure, and as per the guidelines for creating AfD's "
140:
443:
49:
389:
208:
161:
339:
317:
295:
160:
lacks notability (and, as a side, reads like an advertisement), and as such should be deleted.
364:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
359:
that reached no consensus, and I feel that the current AfDs will reach the same conclusion.
235:
231:
467:
412:
291:
268:
240:
185:
437:
As this AFD and others touch of exactly the same issues, see my lengthy comments at
360:
126:
309:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
385:
144:
382:...each student union is run in a different way and have different policies
462:
334:
talk page for the
Student Affairs Task Force of WikiProject Universities
143:), the page has been recreated. However, in my opinion, it still fails
439:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Southampton
University Students' Union
378:...if you are unsure of whether to bundle an article or not, do not
79:
Articles for deletion/University of
Bradford Union (2nd nomination)
314:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (
482:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
139:
Since the last AfD (the result of which was redirect to
148:
122:
118:
114:
152:
has been added. All other references added point to
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
74:Articles for deletion/University of Bradford Union
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
332:Note: This discussion has been listed on the
8:
357:AfD discussion for SOAS Students' Union
71:
7:
70:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
472:04:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
452:03:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
426:09:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
58:02:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
404:23:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
369:22:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
346:18:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
324:18:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
300:12:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
282:16:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
254:16:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
223:15:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
199:15:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
176:15:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
89:University of Bradford Union
64:University of Bradford Union
509:
355:There has already been an
485:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
267:Added some sourcing.--
141:University of Bradford
69:AfDs for this article:
336:. --User:Ceyockey (
348:
343:
326:
321:
147:. Take a look at
500:
487:
444:Timrollpickering
401:
395:
337:
331:
315:
313:
311:
220:
214:
173:
167:
130:
112:
50:The Evil Spartan
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
483:
423:
397:
396:
391:
307:
279:
251:
236:reliable source
216:
215:
210:
196:
169:
168:
163:
103:
87:
84:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
477:
475:
474:
454:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
419:
390:
380:". You state "
349:
328:
327:
312:
304:
303:
302:
284:
275:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
247:
209:
192:
162:
154:www.brad.ac.uk
137:
136:
83:
82:
81:
76:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
486:
480:
479:
478:
473:
469:
465:
464:
458:
455:
453:
449:
445:
440:
436:
433:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
402:
400:
394:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
350:
347:
342:
341:
335:
330:
329:
325:
320:
319:
310:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
283:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
262:
255:
250:
246:
242:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
221:
219:
213:
205:
202:
201:
200:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
172:
166:
159:
155:
150:
146:
142:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
80:
77:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
484:
481:
476:
461:
456:
435:Keep for now
434:
416:
408:
398:
392:
381:
377:
373:
361:Andy Hartley
351:
338:
316:
308:
286:
272:
264:
244:
227:
217:
211:
203:
189:
181:
170:
164:
157:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
340:talk to me
318:talk to me
413:Nate1481
399:Islander
292:Lloyd rm
269:Nate1481
241:Nate1481
218:Islander
186:Nate1481
171:Islander
133:View log
409:Comment
374:Comment
287:Comment
265:Comment
232:primary
228:Comment
204:Comment
182:Comment
106:protect
101:history
234:, but
110:delete
158:still
127:views
119:watch
115:links
16:<
468:talk
457:keep
448:talk
386:WP:N
365:talk
352:Keep
296:talk
149:this
145:WP:N
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
54:talk
46:keep
463:DGG
393:The
212:The
165:The
131:– (
470:)
450:)
424:)
388:.
367:)
344:)
322:)
298:)
280:)
252:)
239:--
197:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
56:)
466:(
446:(
421:c
417:/
415:(
363:(
294:(
277:c
273:/
271:(
249:c
245:/
243:(
194:c
190:/
188:(
135:)
129:)
91:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.