293:". Well, not really. Granted there are slight variations here and there, and there are one or two unions that are just run in a completely different mannor that probably are notable enough for their own article, but on the whole all SUs are pretty much the same. There's pretty much nothing that differentiates one SU from the next, and I've made very sure that I've only nominated those that don't appear to have anything particularly notable about them. There are others that I may nominate, depending on the outcome of these few, but equally there are others that I won't nominate, 'cause I feel that they are notable enough to satisfy
344:
until we have a policy otherwise. Nominating them all in the hope of geting a few deleted each time is not a constructive way of establishing a consensus. I apologized for saying just the same as the previous two articles, but it is exactly the same issue, and the same inappropriate use of process.
263:
I can't see the benefit of deleting articles about
Student Unions. It is impossible to create a catch all article as each student union is run in a different way and have different policies. This discussion would be far better served by having it on all student unions and not individual discussion.
326:
about a better way forward of encouraging people to get decent sourcing whilst at the same time getting an actual policy about inherent notability in place, rather than the current mess of individual AFDs on the same basic issue having different outcomes.
323:
98:
93:
102:
85:
125:
265:
89:
151:
213:
81:
73:
356:
336:
312:
277:
255:
225:
203:
179:
67:
17:
51:
332:
374:
36:
373:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
I did consider creating one AfD for the lot, but wasn't sure, and as per the guidelines for creating AfD's "
328:
298:
137:
249:
219:
197:
273:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
268:
that reached no consensus, and I feel that the current AfDs will reach the same conclusion.
244:
58:
161:
352:
239:
322:
As this AFD and others touch of exactly the same issues, see my lengthy comments at
269:
119:
189:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
294:
235:
133:
291:...each student union is run in a different way and have different policies
347:
214:
talk page for the
Student Affairs Task Force of WikiProject Universities
324:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Southampton
University Students' Union
136:- has been tagged as such since May - seven months, pleanty of time.
287:...if you are unsure of whether to bundle an article or not, do not
194:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (
367:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
111:
107:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
377:). No further edits should be made to this page.
212:Note: This discussion has been listed on the
8:
160:as above, looks like it's had its chance.
266:AfD discussion for SOAS Students' Union
82:University of Plymouth Students' Union
74:University of Plymouth Students' Union
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
357:04:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
337:03:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
68:14:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
313:23:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
278:22:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
256:21:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
226:18:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
204:18:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
180:15:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
152:14:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
394:
264:There has already been an
370:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:
216:. --User:Ceyockey (
228:
223:
206:
201:
63:
385:
372:
329:Timrollpickering
310:
304:
252:
247:
217:
211:
195:
193:
191:
177:
174:
171:
168:
149:
143:
123:
105:
65:
61:
57:
54:
34:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
375:deletion review
368:
306:
305:
300:
250:
245:
187:
175:
172:
169:
166:
145:
144:
139:
96:
80:
77:
64:
59:
52:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
380:
379:
362:
360:
359:
339:
317:
316:
315:
299:
289:". You state "
258:
229:
208:
207:
192:
184:
183:
182:
162:Andrew Lenahan
138:
132:Article fails
130:
129:
76:
71:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
376:
371:
365:
364:
363:
358:
354:
350:
349:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
325:
321:
318:
314:
311:
309:
303:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
259:
257:
254:
253:
248:
241:
237:
233:
230:
227:
222:
221:
215:
210:
209:
205:
200:
199:
190:
186:
185:
181:
178:
163:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
148:
142:
135:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
70:
69:
66:
62:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
369:
366:
361:
346:
341:
320:Keep for now
319:
307:
301:
290:
286:
282:
270:Andy Hartley
260:
243:
231:
218:
196:
188:
165:
157:
146:
140:
131:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
220:talk to me
198:talk to me
234:per nom,
308:Islander
147:Islander
126:View log
283:Comment
99:protect
94:history
246:Noetic
240:WP:ORG
238:, and
232:Delete
158:Delete
103:delete
60:(talk)
120:views
112:watch
108:links
53:Maxim
16:<
353:talk
342:Keep
333:talk
295:WP:N
274:talk
261:Keep
251:Sage
236:WP:N
134:WP:N
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
348:DGG
302:The
242:. —
173:bli
141:The
124:– (
355:)
335:)
297:.
276:)
224:)
202:)
176:nd
170:ar
167:St
164:-
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
48:.
351:(
331:(
272:(
128:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.