120:. Although some student-run revues can become notable by, for example, spawning famous comedy troupes (like Second City), not all student-run revues are notable. Please note that there seem to be several similar articles, and I'm pretty sure most law schools, and probably most undergrads, have some sort of similar show. One such article was discussed, with no consensus,
236:
from other
Australian universities and student theatre organizations, as is evidenced by multiple bulletin board discussions, independent blogs, links and YouTube viewings. The student university revue tradition in Australia is much more closely connected between different universities than it is in America; this is evidenced by the development of
235:
On the discussion page for the
University of NSW Revues, someone quite rightfully in my opinion argues that notability is subjective. The recent posting of clips from the UQ revue on YouTube has gained the show wide recognition within both the legal and engineering circles in Brisbane, as well as
240:
which drew from writers and performers from multiple
Australian universities, including the University Of Queensland. The page has now been written objectively, has had links removed from unnecessary pages, and is an objective statement of a show that does not necessarily have the worldwide
215:(usually not including student newspapers), then it would typically be notable - and if there are those sorts of citations to establish notability, that's what the article needs. If there aren't (and I can't find any - that's why I nominated it), then the
241:
reputation of Second City but is nonetheless recognizable and has a reputation within the
Australian student comedy circuit - a valid category listing on Knowledge (XXG) - as much as any of the other Australian university revue pages on here.
219:
of the article is not notable, and doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. (I think the question of linking to other articles is separate, and doesn't really affect this AfD, but am glad to discuss separately if you have questions or
121:
87:
82:
91:
74:
244:
188:
117:
192:
140:
Makes sense to return to primary criteria: no evidence or likelyhood of multiple non-trivial 3rd party mentions. This is not Second City .
248:
256:
227:
200:
180:
163:
144:
131:
56:
17:
78:
185:
What modifications could be suggested to retain the page? Removing certain links from other categories or from other pages?
176:
70:
62:
275:
36:
274:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
153:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
196:
252:
208:
171:
student groups are presumed non-notable, and without independent sources otherwise, this is non-notable.--
224:
128:
160:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
221:
125:
49:
212:
237:
157:
108:
172:
141:
116:
This is essentially a law school musical organization that I believe fails
268:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
211:. If this group has been mentioned in multiple independent
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
278:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
118:the notability standards for organizations
207:The subject of the article needs to be
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
156:, but no notability on its own. --
71:University of Queensland Law Revue
63:University of Queensland Law Revue
24:
48:as a non-notable student revue,
1:
257:04:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
228:03:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
201:03:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
181:23:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
164:20:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
145:19:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
132:19:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
57:18:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
295:
271:Please do not modify it.
154:University of Queensland
32:Please do not modify it.
247:comment was added by
191:comment was added by
260:
204:
152:maybe mention on
286:
273:
242:
213:reliable sources
186:
112:
94:
34:
294:
293:
289:
288:
287:
285:
284:
283:
282:
276:deletion review
269:
243:—The preceding
187:—The preceding
179:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
292:
290:
281:
280:
264:
263:
262:
261:
238:The 3rd Degree
230:
193:203.217.13.220
183:
175:
166:
147:
114:
113:
65:
60:
54:(aeropagitica)
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
291:
279:
277:
272:
266:
265:
258:
254:
250:
249:130.102.42.97
246:
239:
234:
231:
229:
226:
223:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
184:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
165:
162:
159:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
127:
123:
119:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
270:
267:
232:
220:thoughts.)--
216:
168:
149:
137:
115:
45:
43:
31:
28:
245:unsigned
222:TheOther
189:unsigned
126:TheOther
52:refers.
217:subject
209:notable
158:Wildnox
88:protect
83:history
173:danntm
169:Delete
161:(talk)
150:Delete
138:Delete
92:delete
50:WP:BIO
46:Delete
142:Obina
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
253:talk
233:Keep
197:talk
122:here
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
225:Bob
129:Bob
255:)
199:)
124:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
259:.
251:(
203:.
195:(
177:C
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.