182:
No one is suggesting that the topic is not notable. Notability has not been raised as an issue here so arguing to keep on the basis of notability doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The redundancy of one article to the other is what is at issue. Also noting that
148:
over there. "list of proposed" has the potential to become an ugly list since new amendments are "proposed" all the time. "Unsuccessful" at least has the criteria of the items on the list passing
Congressional muster, but failing state approval.
241:
Actually, is redundancy a valid topic for AfD in the first place? I thought redundancy could either be speedied if it was completely redundant, but was otherwise addressed with a merge discussion on the relevant talk pages.
86:
81:
90:
73:
228:
I disagree that the purpose or actual execution of these lists are redundant. They are two distinct, but important topics. Just because there's some overlap doesn't justify deleting something this encyclopedic.
138:
124:
77:
127:. Since the information is all preserved elsewhere there is no need to merge any of this and the unlikelihood of the article title as a search term means no redirect is needed.
145:
69:
61:
113:
161:- I agree, UsaSatsui's comment shows notability of topic, and this article is sustainable and can be kept useful in comparison to a list of all proposed amendments.
293:
272:
260:
246:
233:
220:
204:
191:
177:
165:
153:
131:
55:
17:
256:
These articles seems to have the same basic idea. It seems like the most reasonable thing to do would be merge and redirect.
281:
197:
308:
36:
307:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
289:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
217:
173:, notable and useful. A merge/redirect as noted above may be in order, but that does not require AfD.
269:
285:
196:
When "The redundancy of one article to the other is what is at issue", your first stop should be
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
184:
174:
123:- all information in the article is redundant to articles on the Constitution itself and
150:
216:
As long as only those approved by congress are listed here, which I believe they are.
257:
243:
230:
188:
162:
128:
201:
107:
301:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
139:
List of proposed amendments to the United States
Constitution
125:
List of proposed amendments to the United States
Constitution
103:
99:
95:
146:
Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution
70:
Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution
62:
Unsuccessful attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
311:). No further edits should be made to this page.
137:I think you nominated the wrong one. Delete
8:
187:is not a particularly compelling argument.
7:
268:Definently an encyclopediac topic--
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
282:Knowledge:Duplicate articles
198:Knowledge:Duplicate articles
328:
294:01:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
273:05:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
261:06:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
247:02:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
234:02:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
221:00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
205:15:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
192:22:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
178:22:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
166:21:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
154:15:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
132:15:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
56:07:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
141:, keep this article, and
304:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
266:Keep and shorten title
254:Merge and Redirect
218:The Placebo Effect
292:
319:
306:
288:
111:
93:
48:
34:
327:
326:
322:
321:
320:
318:
317:
316:
315:
309:deletion review
302:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
325:
323:
314:
313:
297:
296:
286:CanadianCaesar
275:
263:
251:
250:
249:
223:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
168:
156:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
324:
312:
310:
305:
299:
298:
295:
291:
290:Et tu, Brute?
287:
283:
279:
276:
274:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
255:
252:
248:
245:
240:
237:
236:
235:
232:
227:
224:
222:
219:
215:
212:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
190:
186:
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
169:
167:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
147:
144:
140:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
126:
122:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
303:
300:
277:
265:
253:
238:
225:
213:
170:
158:
142:
120:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
280:AfD is not
200:, not AFD.
185:it's useful
175:Newyorkbrad
270:Sefringle
151:UsaSatsui
258:Tbjablin
244:JayHenry
239:Question
231:JayHenry
189:Otto4711
163:Smmurphy
129:Otto4711
114:View log
202:Uncle G
87:protect
82:history
121:Delete
91:delete
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
278:Keep
226:Keep
214:Keep
171:Keep
159:keep
143:move
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
112:– (
49:eep
284:.
242:--
229:--
149:--
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:k
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.