461:
significant similarities with
Katirgamam(but Katirgamam has been leaving the hands of Hindus, and now considered a major temple for Buddhists). The article is, yes of course, based only on two sources, as listed. I can send a scanned copy of the pamphlet for review if it is allowed. According to the God Muruga's wish, the temple has not been given any major modification. I hope that the wikipedia contributors from the region will help to add more sources. I know the rules of wikipedia of notability. And thanks to all contributing to this discussion. --
272:. We have to apply the same standards to a Hindu temple in Sri Lanka that we would apply to a house of worship anywhere else in the world, and not every church, synagogue or mosque would be considered inherently notable either. If verifiable sources can be found for some of the statements that might indicate notability (such as the statement that this is the second such temple in all of Sri Lanka), then that would be a reason for keep. As it is, however, the nominator is right that there are no reliable sources.
460:
The article is about a temple, where all the deities - God Muruga(Yantra), Vilatheeswaran(Wood apple tree), and the letters representing
Vinayagar, Siva and Shakties appeared in nature. This is known to be the one and only Hindu temple of this kind, in the country(may be even in the world). It has
416:
There are no reasons provided for keeping this article other than; 1) "find sources and expand," and 2) "Temples or the yantras that appear themselves are considered to be having high devotional power according to Hindus." These are not good reasons for keeping this article. This article is still
440:
Presently, there are no arguements that address the issues laid out above concerning the lack of both notability and reliable sources. There has been an oportunity for these issues to be addressed, but no evidence to the contrary has been provided. As it is, this article continues to be about a
392:: The article says the temple is second Katirkamam, no reliable ref to back it. The fact it is called second Katirkaman, points to it being distinct from Katirkamam. Merging in
121:
243:
Keep for what? There is no reason and specifically no notability. Also, where are the reliable sources that merit an expansion? Please do explain your comments. Thanks.
328:
Temples or the yantras that appear themselves are considered to be having high devotional power according to Hindus. Resources should be found and added. Thanks. --
200:
148:
174:
88:
83:
92:
75:
17:
441:
non-notable subject which has no reliable sources to verify claims to notability, and should thus be deleted. Thanks.
485:
393:
346:
333:
269:
36:
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
470:
450:
430:
406:
380:
358:
337:
317:
298:
281:
252:
235:
215:
189:
163:
137:
57:
368:
53:
329:
79:
446:
426:
354:
350:
294:
248:
211:
185:
159:
133:
466:
277:
376:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
401:
71:
63:
442:
422:
290:
244:
231:
207:
181:
155:
129:
48:. As ever, a discussion on merging or redirecting can be made on the article talk page.
462:
273:
372:
314:
109:
417:
about a non-notable organization with no reliable sources. As such, it should be
308:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
49:
227:
289:
No notability, no reliable sources and no clear place to merge. Thanks.
397:
265:
128:
Non notable religious organization with no reliable sources. Thanks.
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
313:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
488:). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:list of Religion-related deletion discussions
149:list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions
8:
349:unless RS sources are founfd to back it up.
175:list of India-related deletion discussions
199:: This debate has been included in the
173:: This debate has been included in the
147:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
471:06:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
451:02:19, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
431:02:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
407:13:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
381:17:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
359:17:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
338:08:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
318:18:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
299:00:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
282:14:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
253:02:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
236:01:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
216:21:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
190:21:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
164:21:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
138:21:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
58:19:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
226:- find sources and expand.
505:
394:Katirkamam (Hindu temple)
347:Katirkamam (Hindu temple)
270:Katirkamam (Hindu temple)
481:Please do not modify it.
367:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
400:is not the solution.--
371:. It is listed now.
44:The result was
320:
234:
218:
204:
192:
178:
166:
152:
496:
483:
404:
312:
310:
230:
205:
195:
179:
169:
153:
143:
119:
113:
95:
72:Ubayakathirgamam
64:Ubayakathirgamam
34:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:deletion review
479:
402:
330:Kanapathipillai
306:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
502:
500:
491:
490:
474:
473:
454:
453:
434:
433:
410:
409:
386:
385:
384:
383:
362:
361:
340:
322:
321:
311:
303:
302:
301:
284:
258:
257:
256:
255:
220:
219:
193:
167:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
501:
489:
487:
482:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
459:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
439:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
415:
412:
411:
408:
405:
399:
395:
391:
390:Oppose merger
388:
387:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
316:
309:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
259:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
183:
176:
172:
168:
165:
161:
157:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
457:
437:
418:
413:
389:
342:
325:
307:
286:
261:
240:
223:
196:
170:
144:
127:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
403:Redtigerxyz
443:Ism schism
423:Ism schism
369:incomplete
351:Taprobanus
291:Ism schism
245:Ism schism
208:Ism schism
182:Ism schism
156:Ism schism
130:Ism schism
463:Pradeeban
274:Mandsford
228:≈ jossi ≈
421:Thanks.
419:deleted.
122:View log
458:Comment
438:Comment
414:Comment
398:Murugan
373:DumbBOT
315:Spartaz
266:Murugan
241:Comment
89:protect
84:history
287:Delete
268:or to
232:(talk)
117:delete
93:delete
50:Stifle
343:Merge
262:Merge
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
467:talk
447:talk
427:talk
377:talk
355:talk
334:talk
326:Keep
295:talk
278:talk
249:talk
224:Keep
212:talk
197:Note
186:talk
171:Note
160:talk
145:Note
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
396:or
345:to
264:to
203:.
177:.
151:.
469:)
449:)
429:)
379:)
357:)
336:)
297:)
280:)
251:)
214:)
188:)
162:)
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
465:(
445:(
425:(
375:(
353:(
332:(
293:(
276:(
247:(
210:(
206:—
184:(
180:—
158:(
154:—
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.