298:
Has anyone initiating or pursuing this deletion provided notice to the creator and significant editors of this article? This is considered "civil" under WP guidelines, yet almost never occurs. This is something that should be done by those seeking deletion. If no one currently involved in this
179:
117:
249:
article. I'd suggest merging the verifiable parts of this article into the NYC secession article, provided that proper references can be cited (JayHenry above suggested some possibilities, perhaps).
90:
85:
94:
194:, googling shows only a few mentions chiefly of the form "we aren't proposing secession, but ..." Generally it is New York City that is proposed to secede from Upstate, not vice versa. --
226:. Although, if there's a good article elsewhere on the "New York City-Upstate New York Rift", I would support this simply being merged there. It's not adequate to just merge it with
77:
341:
or something similar. The two articles are essentially the same; the difference is merely which entity would end up with a different name should secession take place.
313:
Define an encylopedia article. There are lots of articles like this on
Knowledge (XXG). This article has to to with an active movement, so therefore it should be kept.
320:
144:
73:
65:
364:
345:
303:
290:
265:
253:
234:
202:
186:
170:
59:
166:
274:
As currently written, this is an essay not an encyclopedia article. If there are reliable sources, content can be merged into either
17:
245:
As is the article only supplies a single blog site reference, while apparently most of the references on this subject involve the
354:
334:
124:
Original research. As mentioned on the talk page, there's little to no evidence that this is anything other than idle chatter.
81:
162:
379:
36:
378:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
361:
279:
246:
241:
211:
158:
139:
262:
222:. Here's a NY Mag article that, though focused on NYC secession, talks about the counter movement:
342:
53:
358:
199:
287:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
227:
125:
275:
154:
50:
300:
231:
223:
195:
215:
283:
250:
111:
357:
per
Dugwiki. Effectively a namecheck for the idea will do, so more of a smerge.
183:
214:
movement. Here's a Public Policy
Institute of New York State analysis of it:
317:
180:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not for things made up in school one day
299:
discussion does so I will provide this notice tomorrow if I am able.
372:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
178:
no real notability beside one blog. Seems to be a violation of
48:. Merging can be discussed on the article's talk page. --
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
382:). No further edits should be made to this page.
261:, add more citations to the article please.
8:
339:Separation of Upstate and Downstate New York
337:article. Possibly rename the merger to
282:(if indeed it is a reaction to it). --
74:Upstate New York's Statehood Movement
66:Upstate New York's Statehood Movement
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
224:The Independent Republic of New York
64:
24:
355:New York City secession movement
335:New York City secession movement
1:
291:01:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
266:10:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
254:22:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
235:22:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
203:06:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
187:04:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
171:03:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
145:03:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
216:"Could New York Let Upstate
399:
365:23:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
346:01:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
321:21:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
304:17:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
210:, it's a response to the
60:03:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
375:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
280:New York City secession
247:New York City secession
242:New York City secession
212:New York City secession
159:BuickCenturyDriver
390:
377:
228:Upstate New York
134:
131:
115:
97:
56:
34:
398:
397:
393:
392:
391:
389:
388:
387:
386:
380:deletion review
373:
143:
132:
127:
88:
72:
69:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
396:
394:
385:
384:
368:
367:
359:Angus McLellan
348:
343:James Callahan
315:
314:
307:
306:
293:
276:New York state
269:
256:
237:
205:
189:
173:
155:New York State
137:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
395:
383:
381:
376:
370:
369:
366:
363:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
312:
309:
308:
305:
302:
297:
294:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
267:
264:
260:
257:
255:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
219:
213:
209:
206:
204:
201:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
181:
177:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
141:
136:
135:
130:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
374:
371:
350:
338:
330:
326:
316:
310:
295:
271:
258:
239:
217:
207:
191:
175:
150:
138:
128:
126:
123:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
240:Merge with
140:talk to me
220:Upstate?"
157:article.
301:Edivorce
232:JayHenry
196:Dhartung
167:odometer
118:View log
296:Comment
284:Polaron
278:or the
251:Dugwiki
133:hawkeye
91:protect
86:history
362:(Talk)
272:Delete
192:Delete
184:Koweja
176:Delete
95:delete
351:Merge
333:with
331:merge
153:with
151:Merge
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:desat
16:<
327:Keep
318:Mrld
311:Keep
288:Talk
263:Smee
259:Keep
208:Keep
200:Talk
163:Honk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
51:Core
353:to
329:or
230:.--
182:--
116:– (
286:|
218:Be
198:|
169:)
165:,
129:VT
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
268:.
161:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.