320:- Not notable as of now. If the said thing happens; If reliable sources available at that point of time, then one can always re-create the said page again with reliable references as per wiki rules. So delete for now. --
159:
266:
114:
226:- Seems impossible to find anything of substance online about this proposed(?) building, outside of real estate listings. Definitely not of any great note at the moment.
198:
because it contains unsourced predictions and speculations about an upcoming building. No references in the article and almost all the external links in it appear to be
153:
244:
119:
295:
if the subject is true what it claims then it will have coverage later on and an article can be created, if it really becomes notable as claimed. --
87:
82:
17:
91:
74:
174:
141:
348:
40:
191:
135:
329:
312:
280:
258:
235:
217:
131:
56:
78:
344:
304:
36:
181:
325:
292:
195:
70:
62:
298:
167:
204:
276:
254:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
343:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
199:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
147:
321:
231:
210:
53:
272:
250:
108:
227:
202:
and used manly for promotional purposes. Lack of notability is another issue.
337:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
190:
Article appears to be written like an advertisement, violating
104:
100:
96:
166:
180:
267:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
351:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:
245:list of India-related deletion discussions
242:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
368:
330:19:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
313:20:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
281:14:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
259:14:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
236:10:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
218:10:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
57:14:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
340:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
194:. It also violates
48:The result was
283:
270:
261:
248:
192:WP:NOTADVERTISING
359:
342:
310:
308:
302:
271:
249:
216:
213:
207:
185:
184:
170:
122:
112:
94:
34:
367:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
355:
349:deletion review
338:
306:
300:
297:
211:
205:
203:
127:
118:
85:
69:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
365:
363:
354:
353:
333:
332:
315:
285:
284:
262:
239:
238:
188:
187:
124:
71:Urbana Kolkata
65:
63:Urbana Kolkata
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
364:
352:
350:
346:
341:
335:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
311:
309:
303:
294:
290:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
246:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
214:
208:
201:
197:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
121:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
339:
336:
317:
296:
288:
223:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
49:
47:
31:
28:
154:free images
322:Bharathiya
293:WP:CRYSTAL
196:WP:CRYSTAL
345:talk page
273:• Gene93k
251:• Gene93k
37:talk page
347:or in a
115:View log
54:ItsZippy
39:or in a
291:as per
160:WP refs
148:scholar
88:protect
83:history
318:Delete
289:Delete
224:Delete
132:Google
92:delete
50:delete
228:Sionk
206:jfd34
175:JSTOR
136:books
120:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
326:talk
277:talk
255:talk
232:talk
212:talk
200:spam
168:FENS
142:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
307:ray
301:Big
182:TWL
117:•
113:– (
328:)
279:)
269:.
257:)
247:.
234:)
162:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
324:(
305:X
299:D
275:(
253:(
230:(
215:)
209:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.