400:
Oh, you can say it. Pecuniary motives are not the only reason that people try to advertise something. We have people pushing anything from fringe science to religion to political views to their favorite garage band, so why not a free software package that they have created... I originally looked at
236:
procedure and that you removed this tag. Once a PROD tag has been removed (and everybody can remove such a tag, including the article creator) it cannot be reinstated. As you did not include a single reference with your article, Υπογράφω apparently decided to open a
308:
not sure how big this number needs to be before this is considered notable enough to be included on WP. From the great feedback I received, I know that lots of people are enjoying the benefits of using this software and I expect this popularity to continue.
199:
This free software project is non-notable: it hasn't received any notice from or coverage in reliable sources, so it's impossible to write an encyclopedic article about it. Prod was declined by the article's creator, likely also the author of the software.
215:
Please explain what is meant by "Prod was declined by the article's creator". I have actively monitored the article and edited it to address all of the issues raised including a disclosure of my interest in this subject.
168:
262:. The article does not have a single reference (apart from a link to the source code on github) and a Google search does not produce any hits beyond WP itself. Does not meet
121:
162:
284:
205:
128:
304:
I added three more references. You can see from the NuGet stats that about 850 people have downloaded the Urchin Client software. I am
17:
94:
89:
401:
it to see whether speedy deletion as spam (G11) applied, but I don't think it's really very promotional enough for that. --
98:
183:
150:
81:
376:. I would almost venture out to say this is just advertisement, but its open sourced, so I guess I can't say that.
431:
40:
144:
61:
427:
36:
140:
410:
391:
360:
348:
313:
296:
275:
250:
220:
209:
63:
406:
357:
344:
310:
292:
271:
246:
217:
85:
386:
201:
176:
339:. The "references" that you added are just listings and do not contribute to notability at all. --
324:: The number of downloads doesn't matter much if at all. What matters is if the software has been
190:
77:
69:
356:: If these are the criteria then I agree that it does not belong here. Go ahead and delete it.
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
426:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
402:
340:
288:
267:
242:
156:
377:
233:
373:
263:
238:
329:
115:
232:: This means that somebody tagged the article for deletion using the
420:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
175:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
434:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:list of Software-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
282:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
411:08:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
392:20:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
361:21:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
349:08:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
314:19:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
297:19:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
276:19:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
251:19:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
221:17:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
210:16:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
64:21:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
451:
333:independent of the subject
423:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
335:have written about it
328:, in the sense that
239:deletion discussion
299:
442:
425:
382:
372:. Does not meet
330:reliable sources
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
57:
34:
450:
449:
445:
444:
443:
441:
440:
439:
438:
432:deletion review
421:
380:
358:Martin Halliday
311:Martin Halliday
218:Martin Halliday
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
448:
446:
437:
436:
416:
415:
414:
413:
395:
394:
366:
365:
364:
363:
351:
306:
305:
301:
300:
279:
278:
256:
255:
254:
253:
224:
223:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
447:
435:
433:
429:
424:
418:
417:
412:
408:
404:
399:
398:
397:
396:
393:
390:
389:
385:
384:
375:
371:
368:
367:
362:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
258:
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
422:
419:
387:
378:
369:
353:
336:
332:
325:
321:
307:
259:
229:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
163:free images
403:Randykitty
341:Randykitty
289:Randykitty
268:Randykitty
243:Randykitty
78:Urchin SCM
70:Urchin SCM
428:talk page
381:MordeKyle
37:talk page
430:or in a
337:in depth
202:Υπογράφω
122:View log
39:or in a
354:Comment
322:Comment
230:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
374:WP:GNG
370:Delete
264:WP:GNG
260:Delete
234:"PROD"
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
326:noted
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
52:. –
16:<
407:talk
345:talk
293:talk
272:talk
266:. --
247:talk
241:. --
206:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
191:TWL
120:– (
409:)
383:}
347:)
295:)
287:.
274:)
249:)
208:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:|
405:(
388:☢
379:{
343:(
291:(
270:(
245:(
204:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.