244:
Whilst I agree that "Articles for deletion" would be more in line with "Templates for deletion", "Categories for deletion", "Images for deletion", and "Redirects for deletion", it's not that pressing an issue, and the procedure given at
173:
the proper place to discuss deletion policy. I, personally, was a bit surprised at how strict the guidelines are (or seem to be). Might I suggest updating VfD template to include a PROMINENT link to the "proper place".
107:- the "importance" criteria is used far too often. While yes, you may believe something is unimportant, so what, the article does you (and wikipedia) no harm so long as it is factually correct and verifiable.
110:
The process is unwieldy, only insiders to the VfD process can figure it out, it drains energy from other contributors having to fight rear-guard actions on already created content from rampant deletionists.
89:
VfD is by its very nature destructive to wikipedia, its aim is to destroy rather than create. Clearly there are objectives which VfD aims to solve, feel free to list those here. Among them:
196:. Wrong namespace to discuss Knowledge policy. Smithfarm: the best places to look for policy discussions are on those policies' talk pages—just like for the regular articles. Try
156:
258:
226:
56:
17:
85:
I propose to delete this page and start over again on a new process, to be determined, after a substantial pause and reassessment.
104:
230:
139:
67:
197:
233:
is tempting—it might help to work against the "it's all about the number of votes" mentality—but probably impractical.) —
23:
281:
246:
225:. This one would probably be kept, despite being an Evil Cross-namespace Redirect. As for vfd itself, see also
184:. And it's in boldface. The last hyperlink on the notice, to the guide, is strongly recommended reading, too.
160:
43:
280:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
205:
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
147:
261:. I'm going to close this discussion to prevent further people helpfully "rescuing" it in the future.
201:
254:
114:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
238:
215:
129:
250:
146:
into a deletion clearing house for unresolved deletions in the various deletion pages :)
74:
This never made it to the VfD page. Might be speediable but I'll stick it on here anyway.
175:
222:
262:
185:
77:
60:
234:
125:
257:
on March 1. It was discussed and the nomination rolled back a while ago. See
169:
subject to following comment: Please let us relative newcomers know where
121:
274:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
200:
to get a sense of what is being (and has been) discussed. --
98:
There are copyright violations, which need to be removed.
159:. Not the proper place to discuss deletion policy.
46:). No further edits should be made to this page.
24:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Votes for deletion
284:). No further edits should be made to this page.
157:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Votes for deletion
259:Knowledge talk:Votes for deletion#Vfd_for_Vfd
227:Knowledge talk:Votes for deletion#Vfd for Vfd
57:Knowledge talk:Votes for deletion#Vfd_for_Vfd
8:
180:There's no need to update it. It's the
95:There are stubs, which can be expanded.
7:
249:is best for that, anyway. This was
182:very first hyperlink on the notice
31:
18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
198:Knowledge talk:Deletion policy
1:
51:The result of the debate was
241:) 18:38, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
301:
82:13:07, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
247:Knowledge:Requested moves
218:18:28, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
63:18:46, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
277:Please do not modify it.
265:18:46, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
208:15:27, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
188:18:46, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
163:14:51, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
150:14:50, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
132:13:29, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
39:Please do not modify it.
229:. (The move of vfd to
117:01:39, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
105:Knowledge is not paper
231:Articles for Deletion
140:Articles for Deletion
221:Redirects belong on
212:strong donkey delete
161:Eugene van der Pijll
255:User:DavidLevinson
92:There is nonsense.
68:Votes for Deletion
22:(Redirected from
292:
279:
80:
41:
27:
300:
299:
295:
294:
293:
291:
290:
289:
288:
282:deletion review
275:
78:
71:
44:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
298:
296:
287:
286:
269:
267:
266:
242:
219:
209:
202:TenOfAllTrades
191:
190:
189:
164:
151:
133:
118:
111:
108:
101:
100:
99:
96:
93:
70:
65:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
297:
285:
283:
278:
272:
271:
270:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
187:
183:
179:
178:
177:
172:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
148:132.205.15.43
145:
141:
137:
134:
131:
127:
123:
119:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
97:
94:
91:
90:
88:
87:
86:
83:
81:
75:
69:
66:
64:
62:
58:
54:
47:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
276:
273:
268:
216:Smooth Henry
211:
193:
181:
170:
166:
153:
143:
135:
84:
73:
72:
52:
50:
38:
35:
53:Speedy keep
176:Smithfarm
142:and turn
120:It's not
253:made by
251:WP:POINT
124:yet. --
103:However
263:Uncle G
186:Uncle G
122:April 1
113:Delete
79:Xezbeth
61:Uncle G
55:as per
235:Korath
223:WP:RFD
194:Delete
167:Delete
154:Delete
136:RENAME
126:Cyrius
16:<
239:Talk
206:Talk
144:VfD
138:to
115:dml
214:--
204:|
174:--
171:is
59:.
237:(
130:✎
128:|
76:—
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.