502:) introduces the Gold Key as a modifier/meta-key on page 1-8, then mentions it repeatedly as it describes each edit command which requires it — for example, the get-document command (page 5-8), the various ways to move the cursor (pages 5-8 through 5-12, Gold Key mentioned on every page), or the creation of superscripts and subscripts (chapter 9). Appendix A lists every gold-modified key, and figure A-3 (page A-8) even illustrates the Gold Key (gold in the original photograph, distinctive but gray in the PDF's grayscale scanned image).
762:. Most of the material here seems to be worth keeping, but it doesn't quite seem to justify a stand-alone article on the gold key. However, for users it was probably the most distinctive feature of DEC's VT range of computer terminals (to say nothing of their emulators and software designed to use them) and would be an obvious section in a general article on them. But instead, we currently seem to have about five or six separate articles on the more prominent members of the range. Failing that, a merge to
801:. (A modifier key would be held down while a second key is pressed, producing a single character code, while the Gold Key is pressed and released first, then the second key is pressed and released, together producing multiple character codes.) For serial terminals of the 1970s–90s, modifier keys generally had to be designed into the hardware, while the Gold Key has always been defined and handled in software. So if a merge is considered, perhaps the target should be a
650:”. The other independent sources generally establish milestones of demand and longevity: the Computerworld news item notes that newer Rainbow computers have a Gold Key kit available for backward compatibility; the PC Magazine product review tests a PC word processor created to bring Gold Key-style editing to MS-DOS; and the (current) FSF documentation describes how
365:
850:. Good topic, good material which certainly should be kept somewhere, and by implication then we need to somehow keep the article history. There might be a case for a merge and redirect (but I'm unconvinced obviously), and there was one when the AfD was raised, but even then not for deletion, and deletion now would be an
633:
I think they at least muddy the waters enough that it's now debatable. I'd say no on the FSF but yes to the others. The remaining hurdle is whether the coverage is "significant", and people have different standards on that; I've been told that my standards are too high.
766:
would work, but if done should require some rewriting of that article, which currently discusses such keys just in terms of typewriters and personal computers - the VT terminals and their gold key were more or less an intermediate stage between the two.
538:
text editor, where it illustrates the Gold Key (figure 2-1, page 2-3), describes it (section 2.4.1, page 2-4), and illustrates its use (using mini keyboard diagrams) with every gold-modified editor command (remainder of section 2.4, through page
648:
The CRC/IEEE book describes the Gold Key and its functions to a depth comparable to the DEC manuals, although it's a bit inconsistent in terminology, sometimes calling that key “GOLD” and sometimes calling it “<PF1:
827:, not fact; personally I'd have put a period after "modifies the normal action of another key" in the opening, so the definition would include prefix/sequential modifiers, but that's just another subjective opinion.
706:
I added a bit more info to the article, based on non-DEC sources, if you want to take a look. As with any AfD edits, it doesn't seem worth putting much time into if there's a decent chance it will be removed anyway.
873:, or as a second choice, merge to an appropriate topic TBD. I do think notability is borderline here and could be argued either way, but strongly recommend keeping this article content for the reasons outlined at
164:
423:
Perhaps the topic has potential, but the current article does not in any way indicate this. If the article is expanded before the AfD expires, then we can reconsider, but currently it's not even at stub-level.
676:. That madness eventually came to an end. However, we still have way too many individual articles on trivial topics that could be better described in a more general article. I might support a merge to
896:— yes, like the Heymann article described there, this one was “an unsourced, two-sentence stub” when nominated for deletion, but has seen significant expansion during the AfD discussion.
619:? I've added sources from those publishers to the article; as before, they'll be used for inline citations as the new text is developed, once the notability issue is resolved.
685:
117:
313:
195:
This article has no references and no indication of notability. Normally I'd say speedy delete, but there seems to be no CSD category that allows speedy for products.
158:
499:
288:) workstations. The creator of this article chose an unfortunate title; a request for move will complete its discussion period in a day or two, fixing the title.
680:, but absent the existence of more substantial coverage, I don't see justification for an article on this topic. Here's an example of an article about
124:
654:
EDT mode supports Gold Key editing to the present day. There are other examples of present-day software which supports the Gold Key (e.g.,
449:
That was a spirited defense of the article, but it has not established notability for the key. Unfortunately, the book that you cited is a
559:, to be upgraded into inline citations as the main text is developed. Feedback on the suitability of those sources would be appreciated.
658:), but their documentation likely has no deeper editorial review process than that of the FSF, and I haven't added them to the article.
518:) begins (chapter 1) with a summary of the commands of the KED/KEX text editors, almost all of which are noted as requiring the Gold Key.
897:
806:
659:
620:
560:
542:
515:
406:
295:
721:
The comparison to Pokémon suggests to me that we should not delete. All of these articles were merged and redirected, not deleted. See
90:
85:
94:
17:
688:. It's a rant about how much the author hates caps lock. Unimpressive in terms of content, perhaps, but it's indicative of
785:
One consideration is that the Gold Key is not a modifier key, at least not in the specific technical sense described in the
722:
179:
616:
337:
77:
146:
344:. Although there are, as yet, no source citations in the (minimal) text, the Gold Key is mentioned in articles such as
273:
697:
639:
590:
466:
450:
227:
924:
40:
453:; it is mentioned in passing on a single page. Precedents do not exist in deletion discussions, as that is an "
612:
483:
373:
Is there an objection that the Gold Key is primarily used by a single vendor? The
Knowledge precedent (e.g.,
140:
901:
810:
663:
624:
573:
Well, those sources look like they're all associated with the manufacturer, DEC. What you need to find are
564:
546:
410:
299:
531:
136:
920:
905:
883:
863:
836:
814:
776:
734:
716:
701:
693:
667:
643:
635:
628:
594:
586:
568:
550:
470:
462:
438:
414:
384:
Is there an objection that the Gold Key rarely appears on new hardware? The
Knowledge precedent (e.g.,
325:
303:
231:
223:
209:
59:
36:
585:-based workstation, so I understand the draw of nostalgia, but Knowledge does have inclusion criteria.
881:
772:
454:
291:
186:
357:
172:
364:
discussion period closes. The Gold Key is discussed in contemporary and historic sources such as
433:
204:
56:
802:
859:
730:
535:
361:
353:
321:
285:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
919:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
689:
556:
461:
for deletion, feel free to do so, but the existence of that article will not help this one.
341:
878:
832:
768:
712:
389:
152:
723:
https://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/rdcheck.py?page=List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_characters
336:. The Gold Key was a signature element of a consistent user interface implemented by
893:
874:
425:
196:
53:
855:
820:
786:
763:
726:
677:
574:
396:
385:
317:
73:
65:
111:
608:
578:
381:) seems to be that single-vendor keyboard keys are appropriate article subjects.
374:
253:
828:
824:
708:
673:
458:
378:
281:
265:
257:
340:
across multiple product lines. The Gold Key article is still a stub, but it
681:
604:
582:
400:
261:
851:
790:
252:(1977). Although it was used with VAX computers, it was also used with
798:
527:
506:
277:
577:. Manuals published by the manufacturer don't really count toward
794:
655:
651:
511:
495:
490:
349:
269:
913:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
600:
345:
245:
672:
At one point, Knowledge had individual articles on hundreds of
486:
there, true enough; there are certainly numerous other sources.
522:
249:
241:
219:
218:. This is essentially VAX cruft. It could be redirected to
789:
article. The Gold Key is a prefix key which is not also a
388:) seems to be that historic hardware is still notable (and
793:, and is used by DEC and compatible software the way that
399:, I expect it can develop at least to the level of, e.g.,
107:
103:
99:
222:, but I'm not quite sure why one would want to do so.
171:
244:, that is. The Gold Key was introduced in 1974 (see
555:I've added some sources, including those above, as
692:. Not everything needs an article on Knowledge.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
927:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:DEC Networks and Architectures by Carl Malamud
314:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
395:While this won't someday become a front-page
185:
8:
312:Note: This debate has been included in the
311:
510:: The “quick-reference” manual for the
457:" argument. If you wish you nominate
7:
24:
280:) personal computers, as well as
686:KILL THE CAPS LOCK on Slate.com
581:. I've still got a functional
498:word processing system (as PDF
360:in a few days when the current
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
892:Thank you for the pointer to
575:independent, reliable sources
534:) dedicates chapter 2 to the
390:“notability is not temporary”
338:Digital Equipment Corporation
240:… except that it's not — not
944:
864:07:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
837:05:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
815:14:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
777:22:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
735:07:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
717:05:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
702:04:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
668:00:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
644:22:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
629:22:02, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
595:15:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
569:03:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
551:21:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
471:18:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
439:18:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
415:18:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
326:18:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
304:19:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
232:17:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
210:12:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
514:operating system (as PDF
916:Please do not modify it.
615:count as independent of
613:Free Software Foundation
32:Please do not modify it.
906:02:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
884:19:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
60:04:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
494:: The manual for the
823:is based on dubious
690:significant coverage
248:), years before the
819:The definition in
725:for some of them.
557:general references
455:other stuff exists
48:The result was
437:
429:
354:EDT (text editor)
328:
294:comment added by
208:
200:
935:
918:
694:NinjaRobotPirate
636:NinjaRobotPirate
587:NinjaRobotPirate
463:NinjaRobotPirate
431:
427:
397:featured article
306:
224:NinjaRobotPirate
202:
198:
190:
189:
175:
127:
115:
97:
34:
943:
942:
938:
937:
936:
934:
933:
932:
931:
925:deletion review
914:
530:Primer (as PDF
484:Trivial mention
451:trivial mention
289:
132:
123:
88:
72:
69:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
941:
939:
930:
929:
910:
909:
908:
887:
886:
867:
866:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
780:
779:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
719:
540:
519:
503:
487:
476:
475:
474:
473:
444:
443:
442:
441:
418:
417:
404:
393:
382:
370:
369:
362:requested move
330:
329:
309:
308:
307:
235:
234:
193:
192:
129:
68:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
940:
928:
926:
922:
917:
911:
907:
903:
899:
898:50.181.30.121
895:
891:
890:
889:
888:
885:
882:
880:
876:
872:
869:
868:
865:
861:
857:
854:of overkill.
853:
849:
846:
845:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
807:50.181.30.121
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
782:
781:
778:
774:
770:
765:
761:
758:
757:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
718:
714:
710:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
670:
669:
665:
661:
660:50.181.30.121
657:
653:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
621:50.181.30.121
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
561:50.181.30.121
558:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
543:50.181.30.121
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
524:
520:
517:
513:
509:
508:
504:
501:
497:
493:
492:
488:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
445:
440:
435:
430:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
407:50.181.30.121
405:
402:
398:
394:
391:
387:
383:
380:
376:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:has potential
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
305:
301:
297:
296:50.181.30.121
293:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
201:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
915:
912:
870:
847:
821:modifier key
787:modifier key
764:modifier key
759:
678:modifier key
521:
505:
489:
386:Turbo button
333:
290:— Preceding
215:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
120:
74:Vax gold key
66:Vax gold key
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
609:PC Magazine
526:: The VAX/
375:Command key
254:Rainbow 100
159:free images
879:j⚛e decker
825:truthiness
805:article?
803:prefix key
799:escape key
769:PWilkinson
611:, and the
579:notability
459:option key
379:Option key
282:DECstation
266:DECmate II
921:talk page
797:uses the
682:caps lock
605:CRC Press
583:DEC Alpha
401:Control-V
318:• Gene93k
37:talk page
923:or in a
852:overkill
791:dead key
428:VVERTYVS
356:, to be
292:unsigned
199:VVERTYVS
118:View log
54:RoySmith
39:or in a
856:Andrewa
760:Comment
727:Andrewa
674:Pokémon
274:Pro-3xx
272:), and
165:WPÂ refs
153:scholar
91:protect
86:history
894:WP:HEY
875:WP:HEY
599:Would
539:2-14).
507:PDP-11
358:linked
352:, and
278:PDP-11
216:Delete
137:Google
95:delete
57:(talk)
829:Agyle
795:Emacs
709:Agyle
656:PuTTY
652:Emacs
512:RT-11
496:WPS-8
491:PDP-8
350:WPS-8
270:PDP-8
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
112:views
104:watch
100:links
52:. --
16:<
902:talk
877:. --
871:Keep
860:talk
848:Keep
833:talk
811:talk
773:talk
731:talk
713:talk
698:talk
664:talk
640:talk
625:talk
601:IEEE
591:talk
565:talk
547:talk
532:here
516:here
500:here
467:talk
411:talk
346:VT52
334:Keep
322:talk
300:talk
286:MIPS
258:8088
246:VT50
228:talk
173:FENS
147:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
649:-->
617:DEC
536:EDT
528:VMS
523:VAX
434:hm?
264:),
262:Z80
250:VAX
242:VAX
220:VAX
205:hm?
187:TWL
116:– (
904:)
862:)
835:)
813:)
775:)
733:)
715:)
700:)
684::
666:)
642:)
627:)
607:,
603:,
593:)
567:)
549:)
469:)
413:)
392:).
377:,
348:,
324:)
316:.
302:)
230:)
167:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
900:(
858:(
831:(
809:(
771:(
729:(
711:(
696:(
662:(
638:(
623:(
589:(
563:(
545:(
465:(
436:)
432:(
426:Q
409:(
403:.
368:.
320:(
298:(
284:(
276:(
268:(
260:/
256:(
226:(
207:)
203:(
197:Q
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
121:·
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.