226:(notability was the reason given for the contested prod), as the conviction was front page news in the UK recently; however this was mainly on the basis of the nature of the crimes themselves rather than the likelihood of long-term significance. A bio on this person fails
323:
although it is worth noting that this created a brief flurry of media, political and police attention to abuse by females, a rather underestimated problem AFAIK. I still don't think that's enough, but I thought I'd throw that out there for consideration.
344:, I don't think she passes the guidelines for perpetrators of crimes. However, I do find it likely that an article on the case would be found to pass notability guidelines. Coverage of this case and the investigation is still generating headlines
163:
198:; the subject is only described in reliable sources in terms of this child molestation event or the individual parts of the event and therefore cannot have a standalone article on Knowledge (XXG).
306:
One of a thousand people dies of murder (in USA). We can not have an article on every murderer. Much less rapists and sexual abusers. Put 'em in jail, yes, but don't give 'em WP articles.
263:- everyone on that list is either notable for other reasons (Gary Glitter, Jonathan King), or because their crimes were much more serious than Ms George's (Fred West, Sidney Cooke).
124:
157:
348:
282:
345:
390:. If the case is of permanent interest to those concerned with the subject it can be written up in more general articles based on the news of the trial.--
341:
371:- I feel we should have an article on the crimes themselves, even if we don't have one about Vanessa George, as the case has been very notable.
97:
92:
17:
101:
260:
84:
395:
178:
145:
358:
414:
36:
391:
139:
413:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
206:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350:
399:
380:
363:
332:
315:
297:
272:
243:
213:
135:
66:
325:
311:
239:
185:
231:
199:
171:
88:
372:
252:
227:
195:
307:
293:
268:
235:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
256:
376:
151:
223:
80:
72:
289:
264:
118:
407:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
114:
110:
106:
170:
184:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
417:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:. It might be useful to look at the entries in
8:
283:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
277:
261:Category:Convicted British child molesters
230:, coverage of the event would likely fail
281:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
347:five months after the first reports.
24:
340:. A relevant guideline would be
222:. The subject will clearly pass
1:
400:06:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
381:20:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
364:01:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
342:WP:Notability (criminal acts)
333:11:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
316:05:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
298:00:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
273:14:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
244:12:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
214:11:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
67:14:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
434:
410:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
392:Felix Folio Secundus
194:The article fails
44:The result was
328:Blood Red Sandman
300:
286:
425:
412:
361:
357:
353:
330:
287:
251:per nom. Fails
209:
189:
188:
174:
122:
104:
64:
34:
433:
432:
428:
427:
426:
424:
423:
422:
421:
415:deletion review
408:
359:
355:
351:
326:
207:
131:
95:
79:
76:
60:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
431:
429:
420:
419:
403:
402:
385:
384:
383:
335:
318:
301:
275:
246:
192:
191:
128:
81:Vanessa George
75:
73:Vanessa George
70:
58:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
430:
418:
416:
411:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
366:
365:
362:
354:
349:
346:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
284:
280:
276:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
210:
203:
202:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
62:
61:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
409:
406:
387:
368:
337:
327:
320:
308:Steve Dufour
303:
278:
248:
236:Cassandra 73
219:
204:
200:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
53:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
158:free images
232:WP:NOTNEWS
57:rbitrarily
290:• Gene93k
253:WP:BLP1E
228:WP:BLP1E
196:WP:BLP1E
125:View log
369:Comment
360:Windows
265:Tevildo
257:WP:PERP
164:WP refs
152:scholar
98:protect
93:history
388:Delete
373:Rapido
352:Fences
338:Delete
321:Delete
304:Delete
249:Delete
224:WP:GNG
220:Delete
136:Google
102:delete
46:delete
356:&
179:JSTOR
140:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
396:talk
377:talk
312:talk
294:talk
279:Note
269:talk
240:talk
208:Talk
172:FENS
146:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
288:--
186:TWL
123:– (
398:)
379:)
314:)
296:)
285:.
271:)
255:,
242:)
234:.
201:NW
166:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
394:(
375:(
310:(
292:(
267:(
238:(
211:)
205:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
121:)
83:(
59:0
55:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.