Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Vanity 800 Numbers - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

257:
but I thought this would be a useful first step. The article was created by a single-purpose account whose only interest is this industry; the article is essentially peacock terms about how wonderful these products are, everything traces back to a single company that sells these products, the
313:
I tend to agree, but I'm not aware of any "Articles for redirection" process to which I could have submitted this. Just wanted to mention that the interesting bits of information are almost certainly the product of the company in question; I'd be viewing them with more than a grain of salt.
171: 258:"research" is all done by that company and putatively demonstrates the efficacy of its products, and seems to be cited word-for-word in uncritical publications that don't thereby qualify as 126: 165: 336: 370:. The 800 page is not apparently primarily spam, and the material appears reasonably encyclopedic. the other article is spam, and should be deleted as such. 202:
I am also nominating the following related page because it's all part of the same walled garden of spam; all the "research" is done by the company itself:
131: 99: 94: 103: 266:, it's Vanity 800 numbers -- which, to close the circle, is what this company calls them. Altogether, a walled garden of self-referential 292:- At first it might appear to be spam, but there are a few interesting bits of information with references that should be carried over to 86: 17: 186: 224: 219: 153: 228: 211: 421: 36: 147: 390: 320: 276: 406: 381: 351: 324: 305: 280: 68: 52:(editors are encouraged to boldly merge/redirect it if desired, or open a talk page discussion on the subject); 420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
143: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
90: 193: 315: 301: 271: 215: 179: 207: 82: 74: 56: 49: 296:. Since vanity 800 numbers I believe is a valid search term, a redirect should be put in place. 159: 347: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
267: 297: 64: 402: 259: 377: 343: 245: 120: 60: 398: 293: 288: 263: 254: 262:. The article's creator insists on the article's talk page that it's not 372: 414:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
241: 237: 233: 116: 112: 108: 178: 253:
A disputed speedy. This should probably redirect to
192: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 424:). No further edits should be made to this page. 337:list of Business-related deletion discussions 8: 331: 335:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 441: 391:Toll-free telephone number 352:01:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 325:17:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 306:17:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 281:17:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 407:20:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 382:16:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 69:10:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 417:Please do not modify it. 287:Merge & Redirect to 32:Please do not modify it. 361:Vanity 800 numbers 83:Vanity 800 Numbers 75:Vanity 800 Numbers 50:Vanity 800 Numbers 44:The result was 354: 340: 323: 279: 432: 419: 341: 319: 316:Accounting4Taste 275: 272:Accounting4Taste 260:reliable sources 249: 231: 197: 196: 182: 134: 124: 106: 34: 440: 439: 435: 434: 433: 431: 430: 429: 428: 422:deletion review 415: 222: 206: 139: 130: 97: 81: 78: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 438: 436: 427: 426: 410: 409: 384: 355: 329: 328: 327: 251: 250: 200: 199: 136: 132:AfD statistics 77: 72: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 437: 425: 423: 418: 412: 411: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 385: 383: 379: 375: 374: 369: 366: 362: 359: 356: 353: 349: 345: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 317: 312: 309: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 285: 284: 283: 282: 278: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 247: 243: 239: 235: 230: 226: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 204: 203: 195: 191: 188: 185: 181: 177: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 141:Find sources: 137: 133: 128: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 76: 73: 71: 70: 66: 62: 58: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 416: 413: 394: 386: 371: 367: 364: 360: 357: 332: 310: 286: 252: 201: 189: 183: 175: 168: 162: 156: 150: 140: 53: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 395:800response 368:800response 298:Turlo Lomon 208:800response 166:free images 57:800response 294:Phonewords 289:Phonewords 264:Phonewords 255:Phonewords 393:. Delete 344:• Gene93k 387:Redirect 127:View log 311:Comment 268:WP:SPAM 225:protect 220:history 172:WP refs 160:scholar 100:protect 95:history 365:delete 229:delete 144:Google 104:delete 61:Stifle 54:delete 399:Nageh 378:talk 358:Keep' 246:views 238:watch 234:links 187:JSTOR 148:books 121:views 113:watch 109:links 16:< 403:talk 348:talk 333:Note 321:talk 302:talk 277:talk 242:logs 216:talk 212:edit 180:FENS 154:news 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 65:talk 389:to 373:DGG 342:-- 194:TWL 129:• 125:– ( 48:on 405:) 397:. 380:) 363:, 350:) 339:. 304:) 270:. 244:| 240:| 236:| 232:| 227:| 223:| 218:| 214:| 174:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 67:) 59:. 401:( 376:( 346:( 318:: 300:( 274:: 248:) 210:( 198:) 190:· 184:· 176:· 169:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 146:( 138:( 135:) 123:) 85:( 63:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Vanity 800 Numbers
800response
Stifle
talk
10:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Vanity 800 Numbers
Vanity 800 Numbers
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
800response

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.