212:
120:
241:
127:
Non-noatable political action committee that has no independent, reliable sources. The article is sourced only to the groups own website and nothing else shows up on
128:
131:. The article should be deleted unless indepent, reliable sources can be found to properly source and improve it. Right now it is little better than an
87:
82:
91:
74:
17:
275:
36:
259:
230:
202:
185:
164:
144:
56:
181:
274:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
78:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
70:
62:
254:
225:
177:
140:
160:
153:
I know of this group, but it's not notable enough outside of
Arizona (Phoenix, actually). Fails
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
173:
154:
248:
219:
198:
132:
136:
50:
108:
194:
176:
unless there are some news articles from a notable source about it.
268:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
213:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
278:). No further edits should be made to this page.
135:and no neutral source is available to fix it.
8:
242:list of Arizona-related deletion discussions
240:: This debate has been included in the
211:: This debate has been included in the
193:Nothing on Lexis/Nexis news search. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
260:19:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
231:19:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
57:02:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
203:08:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
186:04:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
165:02:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
145:01:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
295:
271:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
71:Veterans for Arizona
63:Veterans for Arizona
44:The result was
262:
245:
233:
216:
286:
273:
257:
251:
246:
236:
228:
222:
217:
207:
163:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
294:
293:
289:
288:
287:
285:
284:
283:
282:
276:deletion review
269:
255:
249:
226:
220:
178:Spinach Monster
158:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
292:
290:
281:
280:
264:
263:
234:
205:
188:
167:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
291:
279:
277:
272:
266:
265:
261:
258:
252:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
223:
214:
210:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
162:
161:FreeRangeFrog
156:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
270:
267:
237:
208:
190:
169:
150:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
250:Fabrictramp
221:Fabrictramp
172:I agree on
129:Google News
256:talk to me
227:talk to me
137:Eluchil404
157:anyway.
121:View log
174:WP:CORP
155:WP:CORP
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
195:Bejnar
191:Delete
170:Delete
151:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
238:Note
209:Note
199:talk
182:talk
141:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
247:--
244:.
218:--
215:.
133:add
253:|
224:|
201:)
184:)
143:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
197:(
180:(
159:§
139:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.