128:
I'm not quite sure what this article is about but it seems to be a very very poorly translated transwiki article from
Chinese Knowledge. Notability is hard to discern due to the poor translation. In my opinion, it would have to be completely rewritten in order to resemble a proper article.
274:. May well be notable, but without some serious cleanup by someone who understands the Chinese sources, it's really impossible to tell. If someone does enough cleanup to make notability clear to non-Chinese-speakers, I'll change that to a "keep".
360:. I'm not sure what the article looked like when this was nominated, but as it stands now it meets notability criteria. The fact not all the sources can be understood is an issue, but the article shouldn't be penalized for that.
320:. This is Knowledge, it's supposed to be the sum of all human knowledge, not just the sum of the US and Europe's knowledge. There should be no bias against Chinese articles. If this is deleted, I suggest deleting everything on
248:. The article is badly translated, but it's not hard to tell that it's about a Chinese internet meme, and the reference list shows that the topic has been at least as well covered by reliable sources as most of the
192:
per translation; prior to the copy edit I thought it seemed like a neologism and/or synthesis of ideas. The improvements, however, have me believing that it is indeed a notable meme.
252:
with
Knowledge articles. The article ought to be cleaned up by someone who reads Chinese, but deleting it because most Knowledge editors aren't in that category would be adding to a
287:
Now that the article has been improved, It's possible to make a reasonable assessment of notability, and it looks like it's worth keeping (though it probably needs more cleanup).
121:
253:
88:
83:
92:
173:
No idea what this is supposed to be about -- not quite nonsense but still doesn't seem to be anything more than a poorly translated synthesis of sorts.
75:
17:
304:, appears to be a notable meme, though it still needs cleanup. I made a start at fixing it up, if anyone wants to assist.
162:
79:
369:
352:
333:
308:
296:
265:
240:
223:
202:
183:
138:
57:
321:
53:
387:
36:
386:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
71:
63:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
249:
219:
342:
236:
49:
150:
292:
279:
193:
174:
365:
305:
329:
261:
215:
158:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232:
134:
316:, This is a notable meme, the article contains sources and it certainly doesn't violate
288:
275:
361:
317:
211:
325:
257:
154:
109:
130:
341:- This seems quite notable, despite the quality of the article itself.
380:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
147:. I can't make head nor tale of it after several readings.
116:
105:
101:
97:
256:
in favour of topics from the
English-speaking world.
324:
list as well. It should be cleaned up a bit though.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
390:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
231:Paging Dr Getridovit to AfD. Stat.
48:. Per sources added and consensus.
24:
208:Very non-notable very deletable
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
302:Very bad translation Very keep
1:
282:) 19:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
407:
370:22:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
353:21:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
334:21:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
309:19:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
297:12:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
266:19:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
241:18:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
224:18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
203:21:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
184:18:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
139:17:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
58:03:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
383:Please do not modify it.
72:Very erotic very violent
64:Very erotic very violent
32:Please do not modify it.
350:
200:
181:
166:
153:comment added by
398:
385:
349:
198:
196:
195:Ten Pound Hammer
179:
177:
176:Ten Pound Hammer
148:
119:
113:
95:
50:SynergeticMaggot
44:The result was
34:
406:
405:
401:
400:
399:
397:
396:
395:
394:
388:deletion review
381:
210:. Looks like a
194:
175:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
404:
402:
393:
392:
375:
373:
372:
355:
336:
311:
299:
268:
250:internet memes
243:
226:
205:
199:and his otters
187:
180:and his otters
167:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
403:
391:
389:
384:
378:
377:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
354:
351:
347:
345:
344:Ed Fitzgerald
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
307:
306:ViperSnake151
303:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:systemic bias
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:Speedy Delete
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
204:
197:
191:
188:
186:
185:
178:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
382:
379:
374:
357:
348:
343:
338:
313:
301:
284:
271:
270:
245:
228:
216:Clarityfiend
207:
189:
170:
169:
144:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
272:Weak Delete
233:Plutonium27
149:—Preceding
46:Speedy keep
289:Klausness
276:Klausness
362:23skidoo
346:(unfutz)
163:contribs
151:unsigned
122:View log
326:Davedim
258:EALacey
214:to me.
155:Ukexpat
89:protect
84:history
318:WP:NEO
212:WP:NEO
171:Delete
145:Delete
131:SWik78
117:delete
93:delete
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
366:talk
358:Keep
339:Keep
330:talk
322:this
314:Keep
293:talk
285:Keep
280:talk
262:talk
246:Keep
237:talk
220:talk
190:Keep
159:talk
135:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
201:•
182:•
368:)
332:)
295:)
264:)
239:)
222:)
165:)
161:•
137:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
364:(
328:(
291:(
278:(
260:(
235:(
218:(
157:(
133:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.