185:) seems to have been created as an attack page, or advert for a rival. It has been much edited since, but it does suggest the initial motivation was not notability. Therefore the question of notability should be considered: is this educational establishment notable enough for inclusion? I don't understand the notability rules for schools, so I cannot comment.
249:
compares favorable with most other articles on schools, and even has a RS in Times of India. If it's in there it will be elsewhere as well. Spam can removed, though in this case it will need rewriting some sections, not simple cutting
230:
As currently written the article reads like an advertising brochure, and is unsourced. Indeed I would be hard put to defend it agaisnt a speedy deletion as spam. I suspect this school may be notable, but without sources, I can't say.
197:
The initial deletion seems to have been partly motivated by a belief that the editor "owned" the article which they claim to have written (presumably rewritten, and presumably under a different username), see
150:
116:
266:
89:
84:
123:
Please delete this page as it is getting subjected to a lot of vandalism..in fact, the whole of wikipedia is getting subjected to vandalism!
93:
76:
355:
343:
323:
307:
282:
256:
241:
225:
209:
189:
173:
159:
58:
202:
17:
138:
55:
370:
36:
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
316:
80:
126:
171:
157:
274:
130:
134:
305:
239:
72:
64:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
340:
206:
186:
218:
222:
320:
298:
294:
236:
168:
154:
110:
352:
252:
315:- Delete an article because it gets repeatedly vandalized? Heck, the
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
fixed the nomination, the article was previously discussed at
151:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Vidya Shilp
Academy
201:, and is fed up of other people changing it. Sorry, see
167:, vandalism is not a sufficient reason for Deletion. --
336:
332:
199:
182:
106:
102:
98:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
373:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
331:. No valid reason given by nominator, who
319:article gets vandalized all the time. --
265:: This debate has been included in the
235:unless proerply sourced and cleaned up.
203:Knowledge (XXG):Ownership of articles
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
217:as bad-faith nomination based on
267:list of India-related deletions
1:
390:
366:Please do not modify it.
356:08:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
344:10:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
324:17:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
308:12:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
283:10:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
257:00:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
242:22:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
226:16:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
210:12:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
190:12:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
174:10:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
160:10:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
59:04:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
317:Los Angeles, California
181:The original article (
129:comment was added by
339:it with nonsense.
73:Vidyashilp Academy
65:Vidyashilp Academy
351:per Jyothisingh.
285:
270:
142:
381:
368:
335:the article and
303:
281:
279:
271:
261:
124:
114:
96:
34:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:deletion review
364:
353:John Vandenberg
299:
275:
273:
195:Further comment
125:—The preceding
87:
71:
68:
48:per consensus.
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
359:
358:
346:
326:
310:
287:
286:
259:
244:
228:
212:
192:
183:first revision
176:
162:
121:
120:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
372:
367:
361:
360:
357:
354:
350:
347:
345:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
325:
322:
318:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
302:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
280:
278:
268:
264:
260:
258:
255:
254:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
234:
229:
227:
224:
220:
216:
213:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
184:
180:
177:
175:
172:
170:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
54:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
348:
328:
312:
301:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪
300:
290:
276:
262:
251:
246:
232:
214:
194:
178:
164:
146:
122:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
349:Speedy Keep
341:Jyothisingh
329:Speedy Keep
277:⇒ bsnowball
233:weak delete
215:Speedy Keep
207:Notinasnaid
187:Notinasnaid
165:Speedy Keep
247:Weak keep
223:DarkAudit
131:Dpkmallya
337:replaced
321:Oakshade
295:lucasbfr
169:lucasbfr
155:lucasbfr
139:contribs
127:unsigned
117:View log
333:blanked
179:Comment
147:Comment
90:protect
85:history
219:WP:OWN
94:delete
153:/ --
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
313:Keep
297:. --
293:per
291:Keep
272:--
263:Note
135:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
56:ceNT
46:Keep
269:.
253:DGG
237:DES
115:– (
221:.
205:.
141:).
137:•
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
53:ea
133:(
119:)
113:)
75:(
51:P
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.