430:
undertone of negative basis to him and before anyone says I have a COI I bought a course from him and am happy with the what I have learnt but I have no interests in editing
Knowledge pages. As previous editors has stated this page does have some value and should remain in Wiki however any commercial/sales pitch references should be deleted.Please maintain a neutral, unbiased point of view regardless what you think user:Ritchie333 and you have been heavy on the delete button in the past.
215:, in-depth coverage of this person appears to exist only in publications by associated groups. Generally, where this subject does appear in coverage by unrelated parties, it's either insubstantial or it's because the subject is talking about another matter entirely, which may or may not be notable (e.g., the economy). This subject's accomplishments, while admirable, fall short of
429:
Keep and semi-protect I believe that enough time has been spent on Vince
Stanzione and the outcome should be to keep the article but some of the references should be amended. the COI issue is a non event, I do not think it is Vince Stanzione parties related editing it however it is clear there is an
361:
suggest that would be either
Stanzione or somebody associated with him) has put it all back again. Believe me, if I could have sent this to AfD when I cleaned it up, I would have, and I would have loved to put some stuff in about his TV business crashing and burning, but there was enough stuff in
541:
I think this matter is settled and the Afd should now be removed. The outcome: the page should remain, some of the duplicate references should be removed, any commercial reference or advertising material should not be allowed to be added. Overall the entry in the current format is clean and well
583:
If the matter was settled, the AfD wouldn't have been relisted twice. At the moment, the only person who !voted is me, and if that carries (and tbh, it won't, it's more likely to go to "no consensus"), you won't be able to edit the article anymore as an IP. Is that something you really want?
210:
and are essentially self-promotion. The way this coverage is currently presented is rather disingenuous; being repeatedly quoted about the
European economy isn't exactly notability for the speaker, even if it's repeated over and over thanks to it being free press. Except for
266:
Better
Sources available but are dated. I agreed tat some of the sources are not relevant and I see these are now being removed. I do think the entry should stay at it does have some value. I did find some published bio but it goes back to 1997 see:
167:
318:— Note the "prospectus" above is simply a press release. I'm not able to access the document at highbeam; whether it is actually substantially about the subject (as opposed to his business) is unclear.
244:
122:
161:
615:
613:
127:
607:
423:
A prospectus is a document when a company goes public it is not a press release as someone has stated. I have found the original document here:
362:
reliable sources to make him borderline notable, and I couldn't cite the failure of the Advert
Channel to anything but unreliable sources. --
571:
549:
95:
90:
466:
437:
297:
99:
594:
575:
501:
470:
372:
354:
219:. In any event, reliable sources don't contain much information that could support encyclopedic biographical content, apart from
82:
621:. The article has some problems and attracts some problems., but some clean up would move things forward. No need to delete. --
17:
182:
483:
to back your claim up I have been "heavy on the delete", given I've !voted "keep" above? Anyway, I don't know
Stanzione from
149:
339:: I, and a few others, cleaned this article up a while back, removing all the stuff cited to self-published sources - see
399:
649:
417:
the full article can now be read here and clearly gives information that can be used from an independent source:
143:
40:
611:
212:
630:
596:
567:
557:
553:
533:
503:
462:
445:
441:
405:
374:
327:
305:
258:
236:
199:
139:
64:
301:
645:
563:
526:
36:
458:
189:
626:
592:
545:
499:
433:
418:
370:
348:
293:
227:-factor seems to beg a re-write from scratch, if anything other than a résumé could be made from it.
86:
278:
175:
254:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
644:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
155:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
513:
384:
220:
216:
207:
622:
585:
492:
363:
344:
323:
232:
78:
70:
424:
484:
358:
55:
618:
224:
488:
250:
203:
116:
414:
268:
319:
285:
I did also find mentioned of him in the Times however this is behind a paywall
228:
516:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
387:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
480:
206:. Note that several apparent news stories were repeatedly reprinted from
487:, I just think that's not much that can be written about him from
419:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36617064/Vince-Stanzione-Press-Cuttings
638:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
279:
http://www.investegate.co.uk/article.aspx?id=200502210700148112I
340:
112:
108:
104:
425:
http://www.thefinancialtrader.net/members/tvcfinal.pdf
174:
523:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
491:, but there's just enough to sustain an article. --
394:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
245:
202:, this is the subject of mostly passing mention in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:Also the prospectus of his company floatation
188:
8:
415:http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4890504.html
269:http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4890504.html
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
431:
242:
617:. There's other source material. Meets
606:- He's been in the news since at least
7:
357:) and some IPs (and my knowledge of
204:unrelated third party publications
24:
446:18:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
631:03:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
597:12:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
558:14:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
534:05:49, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
504:08:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
406:09:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
375:13:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
328:22:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
65:13:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
306:09:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
259:23:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
237:22:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
669:
337:Weak keep and semi-protect
608:Mirror September 18, 2003
641:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
208:a press release network
576:few or no other edits
471:few or no other edits
578:outside this topic.
485:a hole in the ground
473:outside this topic.
48:The result was
579:
548:comment added by
536:
474:
448:
436:comment added by
408:
296:comment added by
290:Hope this helps
261:
248:
63:
660:
643:
590:
561:
560:
529:
528:Mr. Stradivarius
522:
518:
497:
489:reliable sources
479:Do you have any
456:
402:
396:CharlieEchoTango
393:
389:
368:
308:
249:
200:WP:LOTSOFSOURCES
193:
192:
178:
130:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
639:
586:
543:
527:
511:
493:
400:
382:
364:
343:- but it seems
291:
223:. Finally, the
135:
126:
93:
79:Vince Stanzione
77:
74:
71:Vince Stanzione
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
666:
664:
655:
654:
634:
633:
600:
599:
539:
538:
537:
520:
519:
508:
507:
506:
476:
475:
413:More sources:
411:
410:
409:
391:
390:
379:
378:
377:
333:
332:
331:
330:
310:
309:
287:
286:
282:
281:
276:
272:
271:
263:
262:
196:
195:
132:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
665:
653:
651:
647:
642:
636:
635:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
614:
612:
609:
605:
602:
601:
598:
595:
593:
591:
589:
582:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:83.37.243.206
559:
555:
551:
550:83.37.243.206
547:
542:referenced.
535:
532:
531:
530:
521:
517:
515:
510:
509:
505:
502:
500:
498:
496:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
454:
451:
450:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
427:
426:
421:
420:
416:
407:
403:
397:
392:
388:
386:
381:
380:
376:
373:
371:
369:
367:
360:
356:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
289:
288:
284:
283:
280:
277:
274:
273:
270:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
209:
205:
201:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
640:
637:
603:
587:
544:— Preceding
540:
525:
524:
512:
494:
459:83.33.248.37
452:
438:83.33.248.37
432:— Preceding
428:
422:
412:
395:
383:
365:
351:
341:this version
336:
315:
298:80.30.57.107
292:— Preceding
198:Despite the
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
610:. Also see
574:) has made
469:) has made
162:free images
623:Uzma Gamal
588:Ritchie333
495:Ritchie333
366:Ritchie333
345:Pugdemskuf
58:Sandstein
646:talk page
251:• Gene93k
221:WP:RESUME
217:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
648:or in a
572:contribs
546:unsigned
514:Relisted
467:contribs
434:unsigned
385:Relisted
359:WP:DUCKs
355:contribs
294:unsigned
213:this gem
123:View log
39:or in a
401:contact
316:Comment
168:WP refs
156:scholar
96:protect
91:history
619:WP:GNG
225:WP:COI
140:Google
100:delete
481:diffs
320:JFHJr
229:JFHJr
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
627:talk
604:Keep
568:talk
554:talk
463:talk
453:Note
442:talk
349:talk
302:talk
255:talk
176:FENS
150:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
190:TWL
125:•
121:– (
629:)
584:--
570:•
562:—
556:)
465:•
457:—
455::
444:)
404:)
326:)
304:)
257:)
247:.
235:)
170:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
625:(
566:(
552:(
461:(
440:(
398:(
352:·
347:(
324:㊟
322:(
300:(
253:(
233:㊟
231:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.