Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Vista Transformation Pack - Knowledge

Source 📝

197:. However, I believe that the phenomenon of users attempting to upgrade the look and feel of their Windows XP to Windows Vista, rather than actually buying Windows Vista, is notable. This articles author might consider writing a stub on this matter, thus introducing this program in it. At this time, I do not disapprove deletion. 158:
It's just one of many GUI update which transforms one OS look to the another one. Just a collection of styles and GUI elements bundled in one pack. Do we really need article about every OS transformation pack? If so, we need to create lots of articles... All Vista transformation packs, as well as its
160: 246:- non-notable. "the phenomenon of users attempting to upgrade the look and feel of their Windows XP to Windows Vista, rather than actually buying Windows Vista" belongs in the article on Vista. -- 118: 216: 91: 86: 95: 78: 144:
Can you be more specific on why this isn't notable? It gets a lot of Google hits, suggesting that there are probably some reliable sources out there. --
193:
I believe this article is more like a readme file and therefore needs to reach wikipedia standard. I cannot decide on its notibility per
172: 17: 310: 301:. Secondly, as I mentioned above, Vista icons are also well-known and popular. So are they deserve a separate WP article? 292: 286: 258: 235: 206: 184: 159:
icons, wallpapers, etc. became popular over the Internet during 06/07 when Longhorn/Vista was introduced. Check Ghits for
153: 138: 60: 82: 327: 36: 326:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
149: 74: 66: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
280: 202: 253: 145: 298: 274: 198: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
306: 247: 180: 168: 134: 229: 268: 112: 175:
is defunct, so I included link to WP:N, where general notability guidelines are.
194: 126: 302: 176: 130: 53: 223: 165:
is no guarantee that the subject is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge
163:
and you'll get about 315,000 Google hits. That's why argue about Ghits
320:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
108: 104: 100: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 330:). No further edits should be made to this page. 217:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 215:: This debate has been included in the 7: 173:notability guidelines for software 24: 266:- this is really known software. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 311:20:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 293:17:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 259:16:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 236:17:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 207:08:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 185:12:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 154:01:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 139:23:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 61:17:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 347: 75:Vista Transformation Pack 67:Vista Transformation Pack 323:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 171:). For this moment, 238: 220: 125:Non-notable, per 338: 325: 291: 289: 283: 277: 271: 256: 250: 232: 226: 221: 211: 116: 98: 58: 34: 346: 345: 341: 340: 339: 337: 336: 335: 334: 328:deletion review 321: 287: 281: 275: 269: 267: 254: 248: 230: 224: 89: 73: 70: 54: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 344: 342: 333: 332: 316: 315: 314: 313: 297:Firstly, read 261: 240: 239: 209: 190: 189: 188: 187: 123: 122: 69: 64: 48:, defaults to 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 343: 331: 329: 324: 318: 317: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295: 294: 290: 288:Contributions 284: 278: 272: 265: 262: 260: 257: 251: 245: 242: 241: 237: 233: 227: 218: 214: 210: 208: 204: 200: 199:Fleet Command 196: 192: 191: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 161:"Vista icons" 157: 156: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 128: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 57: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 322: 319: 263: 243: 212: 164: 146:L. Pistachio 124: 55: 49: 46:No Consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 249:Orange Mike 299:WP:IKNOWIT 282:Userboxes 169:WP:GHITS 119:View log 270:Kubek15 92:protect 87:history 244:Delete 222:-- -- 96:delete 303:Visor 234:: --> 177:Visor 131:Visor 113:views 105:watch 101:links 56:Nakon 16:< 307:talk 276:Talk 264:Keep 255:Talk 231:talk 228:< 225:pb30 213:Note 203:talk 195:WP:N 181:talk 150:talk 135:talk 127:WP:N 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 50:Keep 219:. 117:– ( 309:) 285:, 279:, 273:- 252:| 205:) 183:) 152:) 137:) 129:. 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 52:. 305:( 201:( 179:( 167:( 148:( 133:( 121:) 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Nakon
17:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Vista Transformation Pack
Vista Transformation Pack
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:N
Visor
talk
23:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
L. Pistachio
talk
01:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
"Vista icons"
WP:GHITS
notability guidelines for software
Visor
talk
12:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:N

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.