694:- Agree completely with Scalhotrod, Rebecca1990 and Guy1890. Sure the article itself is weak, but so are a lot of others on Knowledge (XXG) and eventually people work on them and improve them. I've been collecting info on XRCO Awards the last few months myself and hope to work on that page in the future, but there are several other pages I'm in the middle of right now and prefer to complete that first. But there's no doubt that while there are a lot of meaningless adult film awards, the XRCOs aren't one of them. Scalhotrod said it best: The AVNs and XRCOs are the industry's equivalents to the Oscars and the Golden Globes. (And actually, I think they warrant an individual page for each year's awards, just like the Oscars, Golden Globes and AVNs.)
628:
awards in the USA. Who knows how many other
Knowledge (XXG) articles link to the XRCO Award Knowledge (XXG) page at this late date, but I'm sure that it's a very large number. These awards (and many notations on who exactly won a bunch of the specific awards from several past award ceremonies) have
341:
states under the "Article content does not determine notability" section: "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a
Knowledge (XXG) article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Knowledge (XXG), no amount of improvements to the Knowledge (XXG) content will suddenly make the
657:), which would have no real reason to cover other adult film award ceremoies except their clear relevance to the adult industry. The XRCO Awards have also been around for almost 30 years now, unlike some of the other adult award ceremonies.
591:- The XRCO Award is to the Adult industry what the Golden Globe Award (and other "not as famous as the Oscars") are to Hollywood. This is a ludicrous attempt to undermine all of the pornography related articles on the site. --
171:
255:
506:
435:
I've added several sources so far, not just one, and I'm not done yet. You'll know when I'm finished because I'll remove the "under construction" template from the article once I'm done.
615:. There are some more inline citations needed in this article now, but almost all of the needed info for those citations are now listed in the "External links" section of the article.
612:
124:
346:
You should have tried PROD instead of an AfD to give me more time to edit it. I agree that the article is poorly written, but it can be improved and I'll begin working on it now.
316:
I suspect that at least some of the websites now referenced on the page in question here are "blocked on your network" due to your apparent underage status my young friend. :)
570:
main page? Note: The two pages combined would currently be at least 48KB in size, and the XRCO Award page is only going to continue to grow in size as time goes on.
165:
63:
275:
672:
500:
235:
344:
Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a
Knowledge (XXG) article will not decrease the subject's notability.
390:
I have only been editing on WP for about a year, not seven, but now that you've brought this article's sourcing to my attention I will begin working on it.
404:
I noticed you added a source to the article, but it seems to be some sort of press release about an upcoming event, and was published in a trade magazine.
131:
609:
232:
298:
Even though the article sources are blocked on my network it is obvious that they aren't 3rd party and show no proof of notability.--
17:
337:
You're kidding me right? A simple Google search demonstrates that this is indeed a well-known and significant award cermony.
97:
92:
53:
101:
186:
548:
466:
203:
722:
153:
40:
84:
521:
637:
488:
537:
147:
60:
338:
718:
440:
395:
351:
36:
143:
703:
684:
600:
579:
561:
541:
482:
444:
430:
399:
385:
355:
325:
307:
287:
267:
247:
224:
66:
596:
665:
462:
533:
514:
179:
470:
193:
695:
559:
478:
428:
383:
303:
222:
57:
680:
661:
631:
575:
321:
283:
263:
243:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
717:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
699:
528:
436:
391:
347:
405:
207:
592:
88:
668:
standard) and then say, at the same time, that the XRCO Awards themselves aren't notable?
367:: Give you more time? You're kidding me right? The article has been around for more than
211:
159:
647:
642:
608:- Note: The article in question here has been heavily edited at this point, not that
552:
421:
412:
notability, but doesn't guarantee it. In my experience it takes multiple mentions in
376:
299:
215:
676:
571:
317:
279:
259:
239:
494:
118:
547:
It may be a content fork but not because the other article being too big, since
625:
621:
80:
72:
566:
Does this mean that you'd prefer to merge the page in question here to the
660:
How can one be deemed to likely be notable if one has been voted into the
673:
last time that someone tried to delete a major adult film award ceremony
593:
Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
711:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
653:
567:
256:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
206:, the organisation that awards them), thus failing the
114:
110:
106:
513:
202:
Awards within the porn industry sourced only to XRCO (
178:
527:
192:
629:been mentioned in at least 5 different books, the
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
725:). No further edits should be made to this page.
675:. I'm sorry, but this is just not going to fly.
416:media, that is not pure trade publications, for
210:about having received significant coverage in
8:
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
254:Note: This debate has been included in the
624:are one of the most major & well-known
273:
253:
408:says that mention in independent sources
276:list of Film-related deletion discussions
231:Note: This debate has been added to the
214:that are independent of the subject.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
551:is a very short article, only ~4KB.
24:
610:AfD should be used for cleanup
1:
645:for the adult industry (like
208:general notability guidelines
704:07:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
685:21:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
664:(under the recently-revised
641:, and a few of the relevant
601:03:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
580:21:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
562:09:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
549:X-Rated Critics Organization
542:01:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
467:X-Rated Critics Organization
445:15:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
431:15:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
400:14:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
386:14:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
356:13:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
326:21:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
308:13:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
288:12:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
268:12:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
248:12:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
225:12:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
204:X-Rated Critics Organization
67:12:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
742:
638:The Philadelphia Inquirer
714:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
233:WikiProject Pornography
671:In any event, see the
375:has no sources...
48:The result was
662:XRCO Hall of Fame
632:Los Angeles Times
461:XRCO Awards is a
342:subject notable.
290:
270:
236:list of deletions
54:non-admin closure
733:
716:
557:
532:
531:
517:
426:
381:
250:
220:
212:reliable sources
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
34:
741:
740:
736:
735:
734:
732:
731:
730:
729:
723:deletion review
712:
643:trade magazines
553:
474:
422:
377:
230:
216:
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
739:
737:
728:
727:
707:
706:
688:
687:
669:
658:
617:
616:
603:
585:
584:
583:
582:
534:Morbidthoughts
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
359:
358:
331:
330:
329:
328:
311:
310:
292:
291:
271:
251:
200:
199:
136:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
738:
726:
724:
720:
715:
709:
708:
705:
701:
697:
693:
690:
689:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
667:
663:
659:
656:
655:
650:
649:
644:
640:
639:
634:
633:
627:
623:
619:
618:
614:
611:
607:
604:
602:
598:
594:
590:
587:
586:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
560:
558:
556:
550:
546:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
530:
526:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
480:
477:
476:Find sources:
472:
468:
464:
460:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
429:
427:
425:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
384:
382:
380:
374:
370:
366:
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:WP:Notability
336:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
221:
219:
213:
209:
205:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
713:
710:
691:
652:
646:
636:
630:
605:
588:
554:
524:
518:
510:
503:
497:
491:
485:
475:
458:
457:
423:
420:notability.
418:establishing
417:
413:
409:
378:
372:
368:
364:
343:
334:
295:
217:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
622:XRCO Awards
501:free images
469:because of
437:Rebecca1990
392:Rebecca1990
369:seven years
348:Rebecca1990
166:free images
626:adult film
463:WP:SPINOFF
414:mainstream
81:XRCO Award
73:XRCO Award
719:talk page
471:WP:TOOBIG
280:• Gene93k
260:• Gene93k
240:• Gene93k
37:talk page
721:or in a
555:Thomas.W
459:Comment:
424:Thomas.W
410:presumes
379:Thomas.W
300:Jeffrd10
218:Thomas.W
125:View log
39:or in a
677:Guy1890
666:PORNBIO
572:Guy1890
507:WP refs
495:scholar
365:Comment
318:Guy1890
172:WP refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
696:Pumik9
651:&
635:, the
613:at all
479:Google
406:WP:GNG
296:Delete
144:Google
102:delete
522:JSTOR
483:books
373:still
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
61:bills
16:<
700:talk
692:Keep
681:talk
654:XBIZ
620:The
606:Keep
597:talk
589:Keep
576:talk
568:XRCO
538:talk
515:FENS
489:news
441:talk
396:talk
371:and
352:talk
335:Keep
322:talk
304:talk
284:talk
264:talk
244:talk
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
64:7701
58:buff
50:keep
648:AVN
529:TWL
465:of
194:TWL
123:– (
52:. (
702:)
683:)
599:)
578:)
540:)
509:)
473:.
443:)
398:)
354:)
324:)
306:)
286:)
278:.
266:)
258:.
246:)
238:.
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
56:)
698:(
679:(
595:(
574:(
536:(
525:·
519:·
511:·
504:·
498:·
492:·
486:·
481:(
439:(
394:(
350:(
320:(
302:(
282:(
262:(
242:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:·
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.